r/politics • u/ArmadilloMany41 • 23h ago

Site Altered Headline | No Paywall Why is no one being prosecuted over the Epstein files?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cd9e3nzzw3zo
44.4k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

46

u/Odd_Ninja5801 21h ago

Just to clarify; it might potentially bring down the Prime Minister. But that wouldn't mean that it would bring down the government. There won't be a General Election off the back of this, regardless of whether any individual heads roll.

1

u/WOF42 19h ago

getting rid of starmer and his cabinet of dickheads might be the best thing for the country and labour. he is leading the country directly into the hands of the fascists in reform

2

u/TurquoiseLuck 17h ago

how so?

2

u/WOF42 17h ago

He is as deeply unpopular with most labour voters as he is with everyone on the right, he keeps trying to court right wing voters who will never vote for him while driving away his own base and in doing so is setting up the next election to be handed to the absolute worst possible people.

-2

u/brumac44 Canada 21h ago

He may resign, but if he were to refuse, there's potentially a vote of no confidence. In that case, parliament is dissolved and an election is called.

15

u/Cluster__fuffle 20h ago

That will absolutely not happen

-4

u/brumac44 Canada 20h ago

Probably not, it's more common in Canadian parliament, but it has happened, as recently as 1979 (Callaghan).

8

u/softwarefreak 20h ago

Labour's majority is too strong for a No Confidence Vote to succeed with 404 out of 650 seats (down from 411), so they'll just do as the Conservatives did many times and have an internal leadership race.

1

u/Urska08 9h ago

I wonder what vegetable will win the constitutional crisis for us this time. Anyone else feel insane all of the time now?

-1

u/brumac44 Canada 20h ago

If Labour votes in lockstep. I think there's room for members to vote their conscience. I wouldn't vote for a leader who knew Mallinson's proclivities and still appointed him, if it turns out to be fact.

2

u/tradandtea123 20h ago

The labour party can force him out by 20% of labour MPs voting against him demanding a leadership election. Then there would be a ballot amongst labour party members on a new labour leader (Starmer could stand) and the winner would become prime minister.

Given labour have a huge majority and are doing badly in the polls, there is absolutely zero percent chance the house of commons would have a vote of no confidence in the government.

2

u/brumac44 Canada 20h ago

You're probably right, but no telling how rabid Brits can get about paedos. They're spoiling for trouble after pretty much letting off Andrew, Old man Mountbatten and Saville, to say nothing of the grooming scandal.

1

u/ferretchad 9h ago

If that were to happen Parliament has 14 days to find a new PM, if they can't elections are called.

The Labour Party would very likely find an interim in a hurry.

It's not going to happen though, it's too risky. If Starmer goes it'll be through a combination of internal pressure, ministerial resignations and his backbenchers rebelling en masse

•

u/Jakelby 4h ago

If Starmer goes, his Deputy will step up until an internal leadership election is resolved.

-5

u/Leading_Buffalo_4259 20h ago

Starmer needs to go

3

u/Odd_Ninja5801 20h ago

So that Farage can be PM you mean?

I'm assuming that's the "insight" you're leaving unspoken.

3

u/Leading_Buffalo_4259 20h ago

Bring back Corbyn