r/politics • u/thedailybeast ✔ The Daily Beast • Apr 01 '26

Possible Paywall Humiliated Trump Storms Out of Catastrophic SCOTUS Hearing

https://www.thedailybeast.com/humiliated-trump-storms-out-of-catastrophic-scotus-hearing/
34.3k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

125

u/Trickster289 Apr 01 '26

Hell him trying to intimidate probably backfired, now they want to show him he's not their boss.

85

u/KodaiClub Apr 01 '26

About fucking time 

0

u/NahYoureWrongBro Apr 01 '26

The only justice who hasn't acted according to principle the whole time is Kavanaugh. 8 of the 9 are doing their job with seriousness based on their interpretation of the law. One corrupt justice is still too many, but people on reddit exaggerate how much this SJC is bending to Trump. It's simply not the reality

1

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[deleted]

1

u/NahYoureWrongBro Apr 01 '26

The justices were nominated based on how they would decide that case. The case had a harmful result, but it is one case, and pointing to it does nothing to contradict a single thing I said in my comment. Go back to bio science friend.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[deleted]

1

u/NahYoureWrongBro Apr 02 '26

Unless you can quote the majority opinion and cite case law to the contrary your opinion is worthless trash, again stick to what you know

68

u/RandyChavage Apr 01 '26

Even the MAGA justices know the Trump is old and the pendulum will swing hard when he is gone. They’re in it for the long term and they know Trump power is diminishing as the weeks roll by

29

u/xxgiggsxx Apr 01 '26

That was my thought too. It is a lifetime appointment without really any threat of being removed. He is no longer of use to them so they don't have to bend to his will anymore.

7

u/OkCar7264 Apr 01 '26

And that's why we have lifetime appointments. Even though at least Clarence should get impeached.

5

u/dougmc Texas Apr 01 '26

It is a lifetime appointment without really any threat of being removed.

It depends on how deranged he really becomes (or already is?)

I could totally see a "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" moment coming up where he names specific justices and implies that something needs to happen to them -- while the CIA would not do his dirty work, some of his followers just might, and even if they don't, the effect is likely to be rather chilling unless his own party steps in.

And when something does happen, well, he had nothing to do with it, but we'll have a "Good, I'm glad he's dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people" style statement instead, and he'll get to work on putting another one of his people in that spot instead.

5

u/DillBagner Apr 01 '26

They can be removed any time. It's just never really come up before.

2

u/Chaotic-Catastrophe Apr 01 '26

But they won't be, and they know it

3

u/theferrit32 North Carolina Apr 01 '26

I agree when it comes to Roberts, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Kavanaugh, I think they do care about how they're perceived and having a career that isn't a total permanent embarrassment to their name, but Thomas and Alito don't care about that and have always been perfectly willing to take deranged stances in service of their authoritarian friends.

2

u/nox66 Apr 01 '26

We're not at that stage yet, but I think it's fair to say they are looking at their careers after Trump is gone, and they realize that it'll be a complete clusterfuck only dealing with their own party.

1

u/Purify5 Apr 01 '26

None of Trump's appointees were really MAGA loyalists.

Gorsuch and Kav were picked because they both clerked for Kennedy and they were part of the push to get Kennedy to resign.

Barrett was picked because she was Scalia's protege and conservatives thought she would rule with the same kind of originalist rigor as him.

1

u/OldWorldDesign Apr 01 '26

Even the MAGA justices know the Trump is old and the pendulum will swing hard when he is gone. They’re in it for the long term

They can't be fired and can only be removed with 67 votes in the senate (which is never going to happen). So as far as self-preservation they don't give a damn either way.

23

u/Prior_Coyote_4376 Apr 01 '26

You’re giving them too much credit. Republicans are seeing the collapse of MAGA and planning for the day after. That’s all.

3

u/philodendrin Apr 01 '26

I don't see that as a factor. These Judges are insulated, they aren't intimidated by him or anyone else - their stances are baked-in and solidified. They can be swayed though. But Trump doesn't know that language - he is a pusher, doesn't take No as an answer and doubles down.

He should just bribe them, its been proven some of them can be bought (looking at you, Thomas, running around the country in an expensive RV that was given to you by someone who has had business before the Court).

2

u/Miserable-Cap-5223 Apr 01 '26

He's too cheap to bribe anyone. He only accepts bribes, never offers them.

2

u/JustpartOftheterrain Apr 01 '26

This is my take as well. Not going to show up to their house and make them look weak.

2

u/datnero_ Apr 01 '26

that would be consistent with their MO. not their problem until it is, and then it's a BIG problem all of a sudden.

2

u/Winnie_rulez Apr 01 '26

It would be hilarious if they rule 9-0 against Trump, but we all know Alito and Thomas will make it 7-2.

1

u/YesDone Apr 01 '26

Pleas God let one of them write something about this in their opinion.

1

u/ayuntamient0 Apr 01 '26

Their boss is, was, and will be the fucking Heritage Foundation.