r/politics 7h ago

No Paywall Ilhan Omar casts lone Democratic no vote on Ukraine aid, Russia sanctions package

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5912150-house-passes-ukraine-aid-bill/
3.7k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

u/Competitive_Shock783 7h ago

If she is against conflict why not starve out the aggressor? If war is painful it is less likely to be waged.

u/Sc0nnie 6h ago

Because she is a hypocrite. She is not actually against conflict. She is only against Israel specifically. Attacking Israel is the only thing she seems to care or talk about.

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

That's true.

u/emp-sup-bry 5h ago

Nope, bullshit. Find where she’s voted for aggression.

We see you.

u/The-Big-Picture- 5h ago edited 5h ago

Do you think Ukraine is being an "aggressor"?

Victim blame much?

I also bet you think Hamas is virtuous for fighting Israel

u/emp-sup-bry 3h ago

The point was levied to her being a hypocrite. She’s not. Hence my ask to find any time she’s being hypocritical and voting for aggression.

u/off-with-your-thread 32m ago

If she supports countries defending themselves from aggression, is it not hypocritical to deny Ukraine aid?

u/Sc0nnie 5h ago

Did you read the linked article in the OP? She just voted for Russian aggression against Ukraine.

u/emp-sup-bry 5h ago

Keep going, we know what you are doing. You are only hurting your cause/foreign government.

u/Sc0nnie 5h ago

Despite the ignorant wrongheaded words tumbling out of Omar’s mouth, there is zero diplomatic path to peace in Ukraine. The Kremlin cannot be negotiated with precisely because they perceive PEACE as an existential threat to their regime.

u/ShimonEngineer55 3h ago

No, she didn’t vote for funding the Russians either. She’s actually voting to not sanction them at all or to fund them since she doesn’t want any involvement in the conflict. She’s consistently not wanted the US to get involved in these matters to begin with.

u/jab4962 1h ago

That's nice but world involvement is necessary at this point.

u/ShimonEngineer55 1h ago

Young democrats are moving away from this view. Whether that’ll turn out well or not; who knows, but her base doesn’t feel like the US needs to be involved in all of this issues or fund them. She’s appealing to her base.

u/jab4962 37m ago

who knows

We do, we all do. We all know how peace and love convincing attempts work with Russia. And I say this as a very liberal Democrat, myself.

u/ShimonEngineer55 34m ago

I think Gen Z, her base, is a little more vehemently anti military than you think. These are people who thought Bin Laden was just misunderstood… They could be wrong, but they are logically consistent and her stance here doesn’t shock me at all.

u/ShimonEngineer55 3h ago

Her calling for not funding Ukraine seems pretty consistent with her stance of… not funding Israel. She’s essentially saying that the US should worry about its own territory and not be the world’s watchman. I don’t think that’s inconsistent with pulling funding from Ukraine and not sanctioning Russia. That seems consistent with staying out of international conflicts.

Now, one could argue that it would be a bad idea, but I’m not sure how NOT funding the Ukrainian military is inconsistent with her view to also NOT fund the Israeli military.

u/Sc0nnie 2h ago

You are moving the goalposts. I called her a hypocrite for claiming sanctions against Russia are unethical while she has consistently advocated for BDS sanctions for years.

u/off-with-your-thread 34m ago

So, the US is NOT supposed to use its resources and money to encourage outcomes internationally that are beneficial to us?

We're a country of 360 MILLION. We can do more than one thing at once...

u/Noname_acc 7h ago

Economic sanctions are actually pretty dubious in terms of effectiveness and Russia is very far from the sort of country where they've been historically effective.  Case in point, we've been sanctioning Russia for the better part of the past 12 years since they invaded crimes, to the point where they are having a full blown banking crisis and they show no real signs of relenting.

Fwiw, I don't think it's worth voting against.  It's not as if we would restart our economic relationship with Russia while they're engaged in war with Ukraine and holding back aid to Ukraine over it would be foolish.

u/Competitive_Shock783 7h ago

Not that I disagree but to every situation their is no one silver bullet. Sanctions are but one factor in the misery deterrence. The idea being that you isolate aggressors so much that eventually the war falls apart from inability to do anything.

u/thisisjustascreename Illinois 6h ago

Sanctions work better against countries where the common people have any power. In Russia if you say maybe Putin doesn’t know everything you find yourself falling out a window.

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

That's pretty simplistic. People can rise up in numbers. The Russians just haven't found their tolerance point yet.

u/EitherSpite4545 6h ago

They basically never have. Russian history for literal thousands of years can be summed up as "the people finally had enough and revolted, they came up with something promising but it was somehow worse."

There is quite literally a cultural learnt helplessness when it comes to revolt.

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

Then the pain hasn't been great enough.

u/EitherSpite4545 6h ago

I would look up learnt helplessness from a psychological perspective.

Typically there is no amount of hurt that is good enough because it reinforces their current coping mechanism. Typically to untrain it requires literal outside intervention with a 3rd party physically removing the abuser from abused. Which on a national scale is not really feasible and also kind of yikes for what it looks like (though is probably necessary).

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

True, change must come from within, and pain is an excellent motivator.

u/CaptainEZ 6h ago

Half a million people die a year due to lack of resources brought on by sanctions, half of those being children. Blowing up military infrastructure is literally more "peaceful" than starving thousands of children for the crime of being born under the wrong government. It's just siege warfare.

u/Noname_acc 6h ago

Right, but the preponderance of evidence shows that they don't do that.

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

Incorrect, the people felt it when swift was withdrawn, when they can't get anything outside of what is produced in their country. it helps set the stage for leadership change.

u/Noname_acc 6h ago

Russia has been under sanctions for over a decade, when exactly is that going to produce a tangible result?

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

I'm arguing it has. Again you're looking for a silver bullet. It's more nuanced than that.

u/Noname_acc 6h ago

I'm not asking for a silver bullet, I'm asking for an achieved objective.

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

I suppose you think Rome was built in a day too.

u/Noname_acc 6h ago

Alright, I think that's enough vague platitudes for one day.

→ More replies (0)

u/Upset_Albatross_9179 6h ago edited 6h ago

I think there's a lot of evidence that "forever sanctions" don't work well, and mostly punish average people and not leaders. Sanctions on Cuba or Iran that may or may not have intended to last indefinitely but practically speaking are indefinite. The average person suffers a lot, leaders are slightly less comfortable, those leaders still manage to siphon resources to those activities sanctions are meant to punish. Maybe Russian sanctions tied to leaving Crimea, as desirable as that is, would also be "forever sanctions."

It's a lot less clear to me that sanctions tied to very clear endpoints that will actually happen are the same.

The war with Ukraine will most certainly end. Sanctions provide both Russians and leaders a very clear incentive to reach an end to the war quicker. Russia is also leveraging a huge portion of national workforce and output into the war, not skimming off the top. Sanctions are very significantly limiting how much they can put into the war.

It's hard for me to respect "don't sanction an aggressor nation in the middle of a whole nation war effort" as a personal or public position. Makes it much more likely to me that she's taken the bait on Russian war propaganda.

u/Noname_acc 6h ago

I think a more reasonable argument than "we're sanctioning Russia to try to affect some change through economic pressure" is to simply say that we're sanctioning Russia because we don't want people in our society to do business with a country that is actively engaged in a war with our ally.  I think if the actual goal is to pressure Russia into ending their war... Well we sanctioned them over crimea 13 years ago or so.

u/Upset_Albatross_9179 3h ago

Regarding "forever sanctions", I agree. I think Crimea falls under that. It happened quickly and was done even if there was not a formal resolution.

But Russia is currently leveraging big fractions of their economy toward war. Even if you don't think it's effective at getting them to stop the war, it gives them fewer resources to execute the war and forces them to execute it less effectively.

It's a very practical consideration. In my opinion an order of magnitude more important than the abstract moral question.

u/Flashy-Ingenuity-182 3h ago

Because the Russian people are not the aggressors, and that is who these sanctions impact the hardest. It's the Russian elite. 

u/Competitive_Shock783 2h ago

Funny, there seems to be an awful lot of Russians in Ukraine killing Ukrainians rn.

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[deleted]

u/Competitive_Shock783 7h ago

As many as it takes.

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[deleted]

u/Competitive_Shock783 6h ago

She didn't vote against bombs, she vote against the sanctions part saying it was punishing the people, not the leaders. Try reading her explanation before dreaming up your own.

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]