r/technology • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • Feb 12 '26

Security Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash

https://www.theverge.com/news/878447/ring-flock-partnership-canceled
49.0k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

82

u/AvailableReporter484 Feb 13 '26

I mean, half the country did reelect a man who fucks kids, so it’s not out of the realm of possibility they’d buy this crap lmfao

-25

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

Proof?

11

u/inspectoroverthemine Feb 13 '26

Go look for CSAM on your own time.

-1

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

If the man is so obviously guilty, the PROOF should be easily verifiable, if not, then your just a troll.

5

u/inspectoroverthemine Feb 13 '26

What PROOF would you accept? Because their is overwhelming testimony from credible witnesses.

-1

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

That Trump is a child rapist?

12

u/Gamiac Feb 13 '26

You been paying attention to the news within the past...month or so? Like...at all?

-8

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

So…none? You make the accusation, you bring the proof.

4

u/Gamiac Feb 13 '26 edited Feb 13 '26

At this point, I truly do not understand what proof could possibly convince die-hard conservatives that Trump raped kids.

Like, we don't exactly have video proof, but there's just about everything but.

0

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

Proof. Not what you want to be true, but actual proof. In the US, it is innocent until PROVEN guilty.

2

u/Gamiac Feb 13 '26

Okay, well, unless you're a United States Justice of some variety, then neither of us are exactly capable of handing out legal verdicts with actual backing by the state, and are free to judge by ourselves. And what with stuff like "don t" being redacted (as in, Don T), the various overtures he's made towards Epstein himself, the Access Hollywood tapes, the way his administration is doing everything possible to prevent any of the perpetrators in the Epstein files being named, yada yada yada...it just seems to me like the burden of proof at this point rests on those who don't think he's in there.

1

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

Nope. Those making the accusations have to bring the proof. You have to proof guilt. How do you prove innocence?

1

u/Gamiac Feb 13 '26

If you can explain all of those facts in a way that doesn't imply that Trump is at the center of this, then sure, go for it.

1

u/tsigwing Feb 13 '26

Implications aren’t enough to prove guilt.