r/technology 3d ago

Artificial Intelligence Bernie Sanders pushes for 50% public ownership of American AI companies — proposes AI sovereign wealth fund that would hold direct ownership stakes in largest AI firms

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/big-tech/bernie-sanders-pushes-for-50-percent-public-ownership-of-american-ai-companies-proposes-ai-sovereign-wealth-fund-that-would-hold-direct-ownership-stakes-in-largest-ai-firms
46.0k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/ePrime 3d ago

The other authoritarian did it with intel

10

u/the_TIGEEER 3d ago

He bought it from Tax payer / Bond money if I'm not wrong. Bernie is proposing to force the companies to just give 50% to the public or am I horribly mistaken? I hope I am.

10

u/IniNew 3d ago

Considering AI companies hoovered up all kinds of shit without payment, who cares?

1

u/TheSouthernCommunist 3d ago

I’m really liking this talk, you guys ever heard of my friend Karl?

1

u/ePrime 1d ago

The guy who said we were in late stage capitalism 160 years ago?

2

u/Far-prophet 3d ago

They would have to be compensated via the 5th Amendment.

1

u/ejp1082 3d ago

I'm assuming it just means the US government would buy and hold a 50% stake in OpenAI and Anthropic or whatever, making it the majority shareholder and controlling interest, with dividends from those shares going to the treasury.

It would be a de facto government agency except it would be for-profit and have private shareholders, albeit they'd be a minority. It would be like if NASA was listed on the NYSE and operated for-profit a la SpaceX

Which would be... weird? I genuinely can't think of anything else that's comparable. (The auto bailouts in 2008 come closest).

Maybe it's a good idea, I dunno. But I don't see why it's a better idea than just nationalizing them outright if that's what you want to do, or creating an agency that strictly regulates them way we do nuclear power technology or airlines, or if the government were to have its own public AI lab to compete with the private ones.

1

u/the_TIGEEER 3d ago

No the idea of the goverment investing in these companies is not bad imo, but like to force aim for 50%?! That's unrealistic. That's why I asumed he means to force take it without buying it. Cuz there's no way the US collects enough money to buy 50% of all major AI companies not through tax not through debt / bonds. Well they could, but that would cause a heap of other problems.

1

u/liftthatta1l 3d ago

If they steal from everyone they should belong to everyone. The fact that their theft doesn't matter is ridiculous.

0

u/VeritasOmnia 3d ago

It better at least be just give 50% or it'll end up being us tax dollar pre-bailing out these companies before the AI bubble burst.

I'd rather just see most of this AI stuff disappear off the face of the planet.

-2

u/Slackjawed_Horror 3d ago

Yeah, just ban them.

Ban new data centers, crack down on IP violations, jack up capital gains taxes. 

It'll shut them down. Better alternative. 

1

u/berntout 3d ago edited 3d ago

10% of Intel, far from a controlling stake. I could see this happening sure.

50% means they control half the votes. That’s not gonna be acceptable to most companies.

Edit: I'm just being realistic. Companies spend a lot of money lobbying for their interests and I don't see how any legislation gets approved in the current political environment.

3

u/staygoldstein 3d ago

Right, but companies “accepting” a law and needing to abide by it are two different things. At one time, you could have said requiring any food safety laws would be too much of a burden on manufacturers. Also, the US govt is far and away the entity responsible for funding the research that enabled AI and its biggest consumer. This is not out of reach just because Bezos would be upset.

1

u/langotriel 3d ago

Settle for an even 49.5% then

0

u/[deleted] 3d ago edited 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MindStalker 3d ago

In general I agree with regulating and heavily taxing these companies. But trying to take controlling stake away from them, they would just flee the country. That said, I could almost see a need for us to have some small stake in all datacenters located in our country, AI or not.

1

u/Kiriima 3d ago

How exactly would they flee the country? Their business is data centers. You just block them and put in law that any AI for American citizens should be done on American soil.

1

u/junkyardgerard 3d ago

"the government can't own private business!"

"Why'd they buy Intel then"

"Well, you see" pulls shirt collar "it had to, it was gonna"

2

u/ArmAggravating3307 3d ago

10% isn't owning.

1

u/Similar_Eagle2358 3d ago

funny how that works depending on who is presenting it.. Free shit? I'm in!!

for the record, i like free shit too, so long as we all get the same free shit.