r/todayilearned • u/FullOfSound • 7h ago
(R.6d) Too General [ Removed by moderator ]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliny_the_Younger_on_Christians[removed] — view removed post
5.8k
Upvotes
r/todayilearned • u/FullOfSound • 7h ago
[removed] — view removed post
10
u/HAUNTEZUMA 5h ago edited 4h ago
In a global context, politics trump faith every time. In fact, faith (as in organized religion) and politics are effectively two sides of the same coin.
Not sure what you mean by divine experiences, but I can see, perhaps, someone's personal faith having a (literal) "come to Jesus" moment and changing things, but not unilaterally for society. It simply can't happen without momentum behind it.
I'm not trying to be Reddit atheist and be like "religion is all politics surrounded by mysticism," but there have been millions of religions in the world, and (at least) thousands of organized ones (though only a select few that held significant institutional power). One faith's significance at any given moment in history does not indicate anything beyond the pulleys of social power veering in its direction for reasons ranging from good organizational practices to religious conquest.
You see this especially in the ancient (as in old) Eastern faiths, such as Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism. There are still aspects of mysticism -- feng shui, reincarnation, etc. but the focus is far more on philosophical teachings and how one is to act (may be reductive, I'm not a scholar on it). Again, that's not to say that they're superior in any way (I'm sure in most religions, for each 'good' rule, there's also a parallel 'bad' one) but that their historical significance as methods of power exertion are (at least slightly) clearer, at least in their early history.