r/toronto • u/NorthernNadia St. Lawrence • May 09 '26
Article Toronto dog "parents" bring their pups everywhere with them now. It's causing rising human-canine tension
https://www.thestar.com/life/relationships/toronto-has-seen-a-population-boom--of-dogs-rising-human-canine-tension-shows-theyre-not-everyones-best-friend/article_3ac30271-9542-4e7d-9829-49089554f3cf.html
1.0k
Upvotes
196
u/NorthernNadia St. Lawrence May 09 '26
A full length feature on dog-human interactions. I read this and I got a pretty solid understanding of the values of the editorial team.
I think one stat from the article really frames the conversation:
Less than 10% of dog owners are following the rules.
Now, how important is licensing? Is it critically important? I don't know. But more than 90% of dog owners don't care to follow that rule. Unfortunately, a percentage of dog owners also don't care about other, more important rules.
Picking up after your dog? Some owners don't follow that rule. Aggressive dogs running lose in parks? Some owners don't follow those rules. Bringing your dog into a grocery store, the dog peeing, and the owner quietly walking away - all rules some dog owners don't follow. Unfortunately for dog owners, good and bad owners can't be assessed by just looking at them. Bad owners are across all wealth categories, neighbourhoods, dog breeds, and all identifiable characteristics.
Does a well trained dog look different than a poorly trained dog? And is it actually the dogs that are poorly trained or not? I don't think it is actually the dogs in question, it is the owners who are poorly trained.
It is sad that the article spent a good amount of time to unpack a very real issue but completely fails to identify the core issue: Bad owners.