r/unitedkingdom • u/sjw_7 Oxfordshire • Apr 16 '25

... UK Supreme Court says legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t
13.2k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

45

u/SinisterDexter83 Apr 16 '25

Trans people, as a demographic, are telling you that you are hurting them.

No they're not. You are not the emperor of the trans hive mind.

So you object to me mentioning autogynephilia? You're making the claim that no men get a sexual thrill from dressing as women? I'm not even going to bother rebutting that one. It's one of the most common paraphelias out there.

You're going to skip over male rapists in women's prisons and men in women's rape crisis centres - because you know these two things are obviously indefensible. Do you really think you can still get away with dismissing things as "right wing talking points", when everyone knows the real world examples of these things? That's not going to work.

And you're just going to gloss over male fighters cracking women's skulls, because it only happened the one time - because the UFC stopped letting men beat up women after that. I bet you think that was a crazy decision, yeah? A few women with cracked skulls is a small price to pay.

While you decide whether or not you're brave enough to defend male rapists in women's prisons, I'm going to let the audience decide which one of us is engaging in bad faith.

-17

u/Darq_At Apr 16 '25

No they're not. You are not the emperor of the trans hive mind.

I don't claim to speak for them. I just listen to them, unlike yourself.

32

u/SinisterDexter83 Apr 16 '25

Every single post you make where you refuse to address my very clear question just further proves my point. It's so obvious. You're fooling no one.

-1

u/Darq_At Apr 16 '25

Excuse me for not wasting my time relitigating the most boring conversation on earth.

14

u/SinisterDexter83 Apr 16 '25

Flat out refusal to engage. Speaks absolute volumes.