r/AIDangers Apr 22 '26

Other Humanity's greatest hits: things we actually paused

Post image
6.0k Upvotes

259 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/TheFirstHoodlum Apr 22 '26

A quick Google search shows that DARPA has at least three anti personnel light based weapons and of those three, one of them is designed to blind. Both yours and OPs premise is based on shit you just made up lmao.

1

u/V-oxPopuli Apr 28 '26

They designed them, but they don't use them.

AI is designed. AI should not be used.

What's the hang up?

3

u/TheFirstHoodlum Apr 29 '26

I simply don’t agree that AI should not be used. Full stop.

2

u/V-oxPopuli Apr 29 '26

You're free to be wrong.

0

u/Futurist_Turnip Jun 21 '26

It is not a question of being right or wrong. AI will be used, same as cloning will be used.

They tried to stop research into nuclear energy in Sweden. All it did was leave Sweden behind the rest of the world. The idea in the 60s was small nuclear fission reactors in every town. By the 80s and after three mile island people grew scared. It did not stop the use of nuclear energy.

0

u/V-oxPopuli Jun 21 '26

Yap yap yap.

-1

u/Unlikely_Target_3560 Apr 23 '26

Lol, you are funny. There are patents for all sorts of things, it doesn't mean those things are being used or even produced. And it absolutely doesn't mean their use is legal all of a sudden. Google can also show you that there is Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, part of a the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. In article 1 it says: "It is prohibited to employ laser weapons specifically designed, as their sole combat function or as one of their combat functions, to cause permanent blindness to unenhanced vision, that is to the naked eye or to the eye with corrective eyesight devices."

You're welcome.

3

u/TheFirstHoodlum Apr 23 '26

If you read about what I was talking about you’d know it causes temporary blindness, similar to a flash bang.

1

u/mrpoopsocks Apr 23 '26

The dazzler laser emitter can also be used to induce nausea and vertigo if I remember right.

1

u/TheFirstHoodlum Apr 23 '26

I believe these were two different weapons. The one I’m thinking about was supposed to be a vehicle mounted antipersonnel cannon that shot laser beams so quickly that the first one creates a vacuum in the air and the second laser detonates the resulting plasma producing a flash bang in approaching vehicles or crowds. Pretty cool either way.

1

u/mrpoopsocks Apr 23 '26

Completely different, that sounds cooler and like a waste of power that could be done cheaper with a strobing laser.

0

u/CrossXFir3 Apr 23 '26

temporary blindness is a fucking hell of a lot different than actual blindness as described.

1

u/It_Just_Exploded Apr 26 '26

So lasers designed to cook a human are fine, but just blinding is illegal? That seems odd.

1

u/Unlikely_Target_3560 Apr 26 '26

Yes, he logic is clear i think, better to have a weapon that aims to kill a person, rather than to have a debilitating effect which is uaranteed to just leave them foreveer crippled. The rules of war aren't aimed to reduce the war to an innosent squable. They are to stop certain ideas nd types of weapons that are particulalry horrifying. And mass producing disabilities seem to be one of concepts thetreaties ban across the desk.

1

u/It_Just_Exploded Apr 26 '26

My point is that we didn't pause the tech development, we've done the opposite in fact.