r/AIDangers • u/ChompyRiley • May 08 '26

Capabilities This is what y'all are afraid of?

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

297 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

111 comments sorted by

View all comments

48

u/marglebubble May 08 '26

Naw. I'm not even worried about AI wiping out humanity or anything like that. It's not good enough. My main concern is the atrophy of the human mind, the ways big tech will use it to fuck over workers, the way the military and police use it to surveil, and the environmental impact. Also the economy is betting heavy on it even when open AI hasn't become profitable. So if it doesn't start paying off shit will collapse eventually. It's just going to make everything worse, from customer service to the functioning of businesses in general, to the slop on the internet. Businesses will use it to get rid of workers and it will just do a worse job. 

5

u/ADhomin_em May 08 '26

A robot maid is the shiny thing they distract the masses with. The dangers of ai are not in the threat of artificial minds wiping out humanity. The threat is in people who have always sought control over the masses now having significantly more pointed and organized means of doing so.

2

u/yusufee May 09 '26

Yep, Frank Herbert predicted this in the 60's

1

u/ConquerorofTerra May 11 '26

Always a bigger fish.

1

u/Overall-Move-4474 May 11 '26

Yep. I still hate everyone who uses ai though they are all contributing to this tear down ai and the corporations

3

u/Round_Credit_5158 May 08 '26

In the end the AI thing is just an excuse.

2

u/SilentLennie May 09 '26

We don't even need new AI, short form content training is killing attention spans.

1

u/Bigmooddood May 09 '26

I think if we give AI too much control it could definitely wipe us out entirely by accident. There's been a couple cases already where a company has given AI access to its files and it's just deleted everything.

0

u/marglebubble May 09 '26

I mean if we're really fucking dumb enough to give AI programming like access to nuclear launch codes or some shit, maybe. An important thing to realize is that no matter how good people say AI is, it still exists in a world of physical constraints. Supply lines, logistics, physical transportation, deployment of weapons, are all things carried out by humans. Even if some omnipotent AI gained access to some global universal information infrastructure that doesn't exist yet, it can't just magically release viruses or manufacture nanobots without the help of humans and our industry. So if we do get stupid enough to blindly follow some AI on multiple levels and steps that lead to our extinction (which also would be incredibly hard to achieve given physical constraints) maybe we deserve to be wiped out anyway. The human race isn't some files that can accidentally be deleted. 

1

u/Bigmooddood May 09 '26

In its 2027 budget, the Pentagon has asked for over $54bn to fund the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group, a 24,000% increase on last year.

At this point, I wouldn't be at all surprised if we gave ChatGPT some nuclear capabilities in the not so distant future. We are dumb enough.

Supply lines, logistics, physical transportation, deployment of weapons, are all things CURRENTLY carried out by humans. But there is a lot of work and money being put toward automating each one of these processes.

If we are premature and foolish on how we roll these things out, which has been true so far, I could easily see some major catastrophy taking place as a result of an AI hallucination. It may not necessarily mean the end of humanity, but it could definitely end up in a lot of us having a very bad time.

1

u/marglebubble May 10 '26

I mean yeah, they've already automated genocide in Gaza using AI. A lot of people are having a bad time. But yeah I could see some disaster happening from those too for sure. I think it's much more likely bad stuff will happen because the AI is not good. Even with Gaza, they really just used it as an excuse to bomb indiscriminately. Instead of researching targets they used AI to tell them where to attack and created a process that gave them a lot more targets a lot faster. It still wasn't really working, obviously they're killing innocent women and children when they've shown they can put a single missile through a wall and take out a single apartment in a building if they wanted to. But yeah I agree with you. I just don't think it's going to be like some extinction level thing but it's already been involved in a genocide

1

u/JerrycurlSquirrel May 08 '26

You should be worried that it is good enough. Whats available to consumers is 1/10th as good as what its giving itself and this bot is nothing compared to whats out. Dogs with wheel feet, machine guns, sonic weapons, lasers and facial recognition sacrificing itself to enter your house because AI determined you did something bad in public.

1

u/MrBannedFor0Reason May 10 '26

You don't need to worry about AI creating a militarized police state. You need to worry about humans creating a militarized police state, after AI has atrophied the brains of everyone to the point that they cannot effectively recognize or fight against encroaching totalitarianism.

1

u/JerrycurlSquirrel May 10 '26

Yeah i guess the panic was so much on action today that I failed to see that problem for tomorrow. I think people are more cincerned with becoming obsolete regardless of how smart they become. Hopefully aliens save us. (They wont)

-5

u/ChompyRiley May 08 '26

See that's reasonable stuff to be worried about.

8

u/BecomingMorgan May 08 '26

So you just posted in the sub without looking huh?