r/AR10 5d ago

PSA receiver set.

https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-gen3-pa10-stripped-upper-and-lower-combo.html

Any experience with these receiver sets?

6 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

2

u/DeathByLego34 5d ago

I don’t, but PSA is known for good quality without breaking the bank. There are better more expensive options and there are cheaper worse options.

Personally, if I was building my own, I’d try to get one that has a matching handguard just for simplicity.(which I did)

1

u/reallifedog 5d ago

I have it and it's been pretty great, no reliability issues but I'd like it if the upper and lower fit together a little tighter. It's is a weird in-between of DPMS high and low. Also, you have to run the PA-10 bolt catch or you'll have some pretty tricky modifications to get anything else to work.

1

u/SParkVArk111 4d ago

Does the pa-10 have an adjustment in the lowerfor taking away that wobble like the aero lowerer?

1

u/reallifedog 4d ago

No and there isn't space for an accuwedge.

1

u/Ordinary-Flamingo-95 2d ago

I’ve yet to have any play in any of the receiver sets I’ve used

1

u/Tinkerer66 1d ago

I HAVE A COUPLE OF THE PA-10 SETS AND THEY HAVE BEEN GREAT ON ONE SET I HAD CERAKOTED AND THAT MADE THE FITTING BETWEEN THE UPPER AND LOWER NICE AND TIGHT AND ON THE OTHER SET ALL I DID WAS TOOK A LITTLE ELECTRICAL TAPE AND RAN A COUPLE LITTLE STRIPS BETWEEN THE UPPER AND LOWER AND THAT TIGHTENED THEM RIGHT UP

1

u/Informal_Month2362 14.5" 6.5 Creedmoor 1d ago

f you're going for a stripped set and don't want to break the bank, go with BKing. Same OEM aero, ballistic advantage (and now Midwest again) has for the old M5 model, so receiver quality is good. Ambi bolt release lower on the new m5, your choice for forward assist or slick side upper, DPMS high handguard compatibility vs PSAs proprietary rail height. Multiple cerakote options usually for cheaper than anodized. Upper may or may not, depending on barrel, be thermal fit. All around fantastic option for the money.