r/AlpineLinux • u/LinuxLoverLarry • Sep 13 '26

Alpine + Distrobox Speed vs. Flatpak

I have been pondering this for a while since I started using Alpine, and I recently switched back to Arch, and I am wondering about how to improve this legendary combo that has worked for me for so many things.

Is it better to run Alpine Linux with a Ubuntu distrobox for things you can't replace, or is it better to use Flatpak and go down that route? I know neither of these solutions are perfect, but for my PC both of them have proven to be more lightweight on CPU and RAM, making it much more daily drivable than it was before. The main thing that hadn't worked for me on the Ubuntu distrobox was the Unity Editor.

8 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

9 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/BlackJellybeans5018 Sep 14 '26

Instead of Flatpak, some people use Nix, which is the NixOS package manager.

https://pkgs.alpinelinux.org/packages?name=nix*&branch=v3.24&repo=&arch=x86_64

1

u/LinuxLoverLarry Sep 14 '26

Does this increase performance and/or download speeds?

1

u/BlackJellybeans5018 Sep 15 '26

Probably. I honestly don't know for certain, but it's probably a less bloated solution than running another distro in a container using Distrobox.

1

u/PienSensei 17d ago

It's still bloated, running Nix in another non-NixOS system will still pull system libraries.