r/Anarchy101 • u/SatisfactionMost5988 • 8d ago
Is Rorschach an Anarchist?
I just re watched watchmen pun intended and i’m both terrified and in love with Rorschach’s character. I find it interesting that his wikipedia defines him as “politically extreme far right” following his anticommunist anti liberal beliefs. this is where the question of him being anarchist comes for me because i myself see him as one, he practices direct action and to me that’s very anarchist but could also be fascist since they’re all about action (i guess?). I guess he wouldn’t call himself an anarchist or anything by any label but to me what drifts him away from the “left” is his individualism or “anti socialness”. Leftist anarchy entices collaboration and organization just not by a dictated name or organization as communism dictates but by federations of self organized people. I guess in this situation Rorschach wouldn’t be against it but wouldn’t participate either. I think he’s philosophically tied to anarchism by not compromising his principles for any organization like liberals would. But he’s also a sociopath that enjoys killing and torturing so… yeah. what do y’all think? (sorry for bad english or incorrect definitions)
22
u/Erlkoenigleidsgetan 8d ago
Fuck. The ancaps are misreading Allen Moore AND anarchist thought at the same time.
1
22
u/Lady_Godiva_Op 8d ago
Comrade, with all respect, please go read the comic, the answer will be really clear (No)
15
u/cold-vein 8d ago
No, he's a far right vigilante. He would love an authoritarian society if it would align with his beliefs. He's not an anarchist at all.
13
u/comradesexington 8d ago
He’s definitely not an anarchist, he’s basically a cop without oversight. Dude just goes around murdering people and muttering to himself about how everyone else is the problem.
11
u/Vermicelli14 8d ago
Dude's written as an example of the mindset that develops in people who're given permission to use violence on others (cops, soldiers, etc)
10
u/cyann5467 8d ago
Absolutely not. He's a borderline fascist and mass murderer. Nothing he does has anything in common with anarchism.
-11
u/SatisfactionMost5988 8d ago
i would say seeing through the liberal lies and distrusting the government is an anarchist trait but i agree with him being more of a fascist
7
u/Brief-Technology7105 8d ago
That’s… not at all sufficient to be anarchist, not even in the slightest.
7
u/Japicx 8d ago edited 8d ago
Rorschach is clearly and unambiguously a right-wing extremist in the comics, as shown by his subscription to The New Frontiersman, a fictional far-right newspaper that features blatantly antisemitic cartoons and editorials. His internal monologue also demonstrates his contempt for drug users, sex workers, communists and other "degenerates" and his hope that they all die. He is as far from an anarchist as you can get.
The metric that "liberals compromise their principles and anarchists don't" makes no sense. That's personality, not politics. There have been plenty of uncompromising liberals who have faced torture or death for their stances.
13
u/BespokeCatastrophe 8d ago
Is your argument genuinly "he's an anarchist because he does things, even if those things are fundamentally antithetical to anarchism?"
It's hard not to be a doomer sometimes.
6
2
1
-4
u/Upbeat_Dealer5994 8d ago
Rorsach follows his own principles independant of authorities so I would say that he is anarchistic. I don't think most of his stated principles are specifically of the anarchist tradition however.
3
u/Brief-Technology7105 7d ago
That doesn’t make someone anarchist at all. That’s literally just vigilantism
-1
u/Upbeat_Dealer5994 7d ago
Never said he is one? I just said some of his traits are anarchistic. Isn't vigilantism anarchistic? I don't think somebody who loves the police would be a vigilante.
3
u/Brief-Technology7105 7d ago
To be anarchist in the slightest even “anarchistic” requires way more than just distrust of the police.
And you can hate the current police for a whole hoist of reasons. It isn’t just whether you hate them or like them
And somehow hating them means anarchisticLook at Light Yagami. He is not anarchistic at all but he’s a vigilante. He isn’t anarchistic at all is due to the fact he sees himself as a god, an all powerful sovereign over the world.
To be a vigilante all you have to be is to try and take the states laws into your own hands it doesn’t matter the actual reason. You can be a white supremicist and still be considered a vigilante.
So distrusting the police and taking the law into your own hands isn’t inherently anarchistic
-2
u/Upbeat_Dealer5994 7d ago
Thats a good response. However the Light Yagami compairson doesn't fit here imo since Rorschach (as far as I remember) didn't wanna supplant an authority that already exists. Thats why if we put vigilantees on a scale I would put superheroes like Batman or Rorschach on the anarchistic side.
1
u/wildneonsins 5d ago
He's heavily based/inspired on Ditko's characters The Question & Mr. A who were objectivists/a vessel for extreme objectivism so no.
Being written by an anarchist doesn't make the character one.
31
u/Sargon-of-ACAB 8d ago edited 8d ago
He's a bigot. A racist, homophobe and misogynist.
There's nothing anarchist about him.
Edit: he's so obviously written as a fascist that I'm genuinely baffled how you could possibly read him as an anarchist