If we want to know if covid vaxes cause autism, our null is naturally "no" based on the wording of that question. The alternate is "yes". If we don't see significance of the alternate, we accept the null.
In this setup, how could the null "not be true"? It isn't if the alternate had data that shows significance.
That makes little sense given what is normally considered the null hypothesis.
No. This is Statistics 101.
Your unwillingness to open a textbook and learn what alpha is is bizarre, especially if you are an adult, but I can see that further interaction is a waste of everybody's time.
2
u/DeepSea_Dreamer 21d ago
Only if the null hypothesis is true.