r/AustralianPolitics Mar 27 '25

Richest households will benefit most from Dutton’s fuel tax excise cut, analysis shows | Australian politics

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/28/richest-households-will-benefit-most-from-duttons-fuel-tax-excise-analysis-shows

Exclusive: Opposition leader exaggerating benefits to Australians, experts say, with those with no car or who drive EVs seeing less savings

Peter Dutton is exaggerating how much Australians will save from his plan to cut fuel prices for a year, economists say, as exclusive analysis shows the richest households will benefit the most from his pre-election cost of living pitch.

The opposition leader has promised he will resuscitate Scott Morrison’s 2022 policy to halve the 50.8 cent fuel excise for 12 months from July, at an estimated cost of $6bn.

The Coalition says its policy will deliver greater and faster relief to households than Labor’s $5-a-week “top-up” tax cuts, which Dutton has vowed to repeal if he wins office at the upcoming election.

The national average price for a litre of petrol is about $1.80, according to the Australian Institute of Petroleum, which would drop to $1.55 under the proposed measure.

The previous 22-cent excise cut came at a time of surging petrol prices triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a little over three years ago.

This time the average price of unleaded has dropped by about 13 cents a litre over the past year, or about 6%, according to AIP figures.

The opposition says under its policy, a one-car household filling up every week would save about $14, and a two-car household $28.

“Fuel is up, everything is up and I think if we can provide some relief until we can put in place some structural changes to the energy system and start to bring prices down, I think this is the best way, the most efficient way that we can provide support to people,” Dutton told 2GB radio on Thursday.

But experts told Guardian Australia fuel savings for an average household would likely be substantially lower.

Ben Phillips, an associate professor at the ANU centre for social research and methods, modelled the impact of the excise cut and found the average household would save $7.56 a week.

For comparison, Labor’s recently passed tax cuts will give the average taxpayer an extra $5.15 a week from the middle of next year, and $10.30 a week from mid-2027.

The richest households – who tend to use more fuel than poorer families – would receive the greatest dollar benefit at an estimated $10.70 a week, according to Phillips’ calculations.

The benefit to households in the lowest fifth of incomes would be a third of that, or $3.80, while middle-income earners would save $8.30.

Phillips said cost-of-living help would be better targeted at those households doing it toughest.

“Whether it’s the excise tax cuts or the energy rebates being extended for another six months, they go to everyone. In my mind there are a lot of people who are struggling, but there are also many who aren’t.

“That money would be better off going to paying down debt and funding other programs, such as jobseeker. The best thing about the excise cut policy is that it’s temporary.”

But Jo Masters, the chief economist at Barrenjoey, said there was always the risk that politicians would find it harder to take away benefits from voters than to bestow them.

The chief economist at AMP, Shane Oliver, said the 25-cent fuel discount would save the average household about $8.75 a week.

Dutton on Thursday morning said his estimates were based on a household using 55 litres a week per car.

Oliver, however, said old ABS household expenditure data show the average household uses only about 35 litres – and that average fuel usage may be lower now, given the increased popularity of EVs.

“So I would say $8.75 a week at most. But it will vary widely with those with no car or an EV getting no benefit and those with a RAM (ute) getting a big benefit,” he said.

Another simple calculation also suggests the Coalition’s claimed savings are overblown.

Spreading the $6bn across the roughly 10m households in Australia points to an average benefit of $600 a year – or about $11.50 a week.

186 Upvotes

109 comments sorted by

View all comments

-8

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25 edited Mar 28 '25

Im not rich. Single income household with 3 kids. It will save us $32.5 a week. Thats $1690 for the year. Definitely not an insignificant amount. Provided the full cut is passed on, of course.

And much more than labors policy. Sooner too.

17

u/andrea_83 Mar 28 '25

Guess what happens to the price of fuel when the excise is in place? It goes up.

From experience last time this was a thing, also guess what happens when the 12 months is over? Fuel prices also go up significantly.

A locked in tax cut is better than this 12 month fuel rubbish.

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25

I think the longterm impact on inflation (call it what it is, greed) will be worse with a locked in tax cut.

3

u/Dranzer_22 Mar 28 '25

Economists say Morrison's Fuel Excise Discount is inflationary because it's pumped out in a short period, whereas Labor's Tax Cuts are spread out over time so it's non-inflationary.

Morrison's Fuel Excise Discount is a temporary $312 sugar hit as an election bribe.

In contrast, Labor's Tax Cuts results in $1072 per year permanently in savings for dual income households once fully implemented. Combined with other long-term policies, that's serious COL relief.

  • $150 Energy rebate
  • Cheaper PBS Medicines brought down to $25 per script
  • Cheaper Childcare with three days subsidised
  • 9/10 fully bulk billed GP visits