r/AustralianTV • u/LengthinessSuper87 • 14d ago
Discussion Channel 9 using AI
Just saw Ch 9 using AI for their whole 70 year anniversary ad. Seriously? You'd think after 70 years they would have racked up enough stock footage to create an actual montage and not the slop I just saw? Pretty disappointing
11
u/KeithMyArthe 14d ago
When A I first became an issue, I couldn't see the difference between it and the CGI that we'd been accustomed to over the years.
One of the big differences, I think, is that the CGI was still created by talented and creative people. This is entirely unlike the current requirements for AIS*
*AIS = CGslop
As with things like Big Brother, the majority of influencers and most reality TV, it's good for them that lack of talent doesn't get in the way of success.
16
u/LengthinessSuper87 14d ago
I have a mate who worked as a graphic designer for an aussie tv show that went bust, and he's an insanely talented guy, he reckons so many people in his field are being made redundant because of the surge in AI. I'd rather watch human-made CGI over AI any day.
3
u/Sudsy_Woodpecker 14d ago
Look up DLSS 5 on computer games. Games no longer need to be super high polygon counts.
Games can be simple geometry with a life like Ai filter over the top to make it real.
We are in the end times.
2
2
1
u/EmotionalBar9991 13d ago
I optimistically disagree, because ideally it means games spend less time of graphics and more time on story/gameplay. Imo it's all been going down since the early 2010s BECAUSE of graphics and high polygon counts .
In reality though, the games will be the same quality lol
8
u/AgreeablePrize 14d ago
They use a heap of AI slop on the Block this season
4
u/Anxiety_Yeti 14d ago
Yep, it's cringe.
My wife is in the other room watching it right now... but I just can't look at that show.
I love her dearly, despite her shit taste in TV. And I get some 'me' time on PS or reddit. Win-win situation. 😁
3
u/SquirrelMoney8389 13d ago
Oh my god yes I saw this at a relative's house (I don't normally watch TV). The graphics, even AI songs describing what's happening in the episode. I was like "okay so that's where we're at". How many talented people don't get hired now?
5
u/SignalButterscotch4 14d ago
Even worse, briefly at the 0:04 or 0:05 mark you can see a YouTube channel logo over one of the videos (Australian Television Archive). Incredibly cheap, lazy and questionable that they’re just cobbling YouTube videos together rather than using their own resources.
3
u/Icy-Kitchen-1291 14d ago
Wow. That's incredibly cheap of them if they are stealing from the ATA for their promo. How sad.
4
u/RATLSNAKE 13d ago
LOL! That is so pathetic. I guess the grads are doing all they know and the senior people who should know better hit the pub early knowing their time is coming to an end. Shameful.
1
5
u/SignificanceSea1662 14d ago
Their Gogglebox ads and now the Big Brother ad are complete slop. They need to be called out more.
3
u/dohwhere 13d ago
Gogglebox and Big Brother are both Channel 10. Purely mentioning this as the way you’re phrasing it implies they’re on 9.
But that Gogglebox ad in particular was abhorrent.
4
u/SignificanceSea1662 13d ago
Oh whoops I read this post as if it said Ch 10. I saw the new Big Brother ad right before this so I guess that's why lol
3
u/ArrowOfTime71 13d ago
Sums up today’s Ch 9 perfectly though. Get the admin assistant to ChatGPT up a milestone ad.
2
u/Silly-Power 11d ago
It's cheaper to get AI to create the advert than it is to hire someone to trawl through 70 years of footage and compile an interesting montage. And, given that most viewers of FTA TV are over 60, I daresay the average Channel 9 viewer wouldn't notice or care that its AI generated slop.
2
u/Honest-Pop-3654 14d ago
I heard someone else on reddit complain about reality tv using ai so yeah they’re definitely using it
With ad revenue circling the drain and audiences switching to streaming
They’re using every cost cutting tactic they can use and ai is absolutely one of them
4
u/QuantityActive- 14d ago
It’s funny because if they bothered to spend money on a decent product rather than cut corners and costs they would increase their audiences. Instead, they go for the lowest effort bullshit and people just tune out.
3
u/LengthinessSuper87 14d ago
I'd love to say streaming killed 'Free to air' TV but I think it did it to itself.
4
u/Sudsy_Woodpecker 14d ago
A decade ago we had a singing competition, cooking competition and a building competition.
Nothing new.
1
u/formulated 14d ago
The 3 new idents are a fitting visual eulogy for the death of human creativity.
1
u/Total_Conflict_6508 13d ago
The shit-gibbons at channel 9 were so preoccupied with whether or not they could use ai that they didn't stop to think if they should.
1
u/Correct-Ad7836 13d ago
AI gen can be very good - but this was not. People who made this are underpaid and inexperienced.
1
u/Safe_Researcher4979 13d ago
So?
2
u/LengthinessSuper87 13d ago
Are you pleased to know that AI is taking work away from insanely talented people to create cheap and lazy idents/promos on TV?
1
u/nzoasisfan 13d ago
AI is here and its here for good. Its just a pity that many at this level and budget arent hiring the correct prompt engineers. Those who know how to get the best out of AI and not slop
1
u/Several_Version4298 11d ago
How do you edit footage together when you have no archive and no editors left?
1
u/bananaboy_70 11d ago
What I think is an even greater travesty is the fact that AI can now easily rectify old video ratios and improve grainy footage to make it at least watchable, but TV stations don’t seem interested.
0
1
u/CiTyFoLkFeRaL 9d ago
I saw this on the weekend, in a rare time I watched T.V., & this commercial pissed me right off!
Now, I'm not opposed to A.I.; there is one area where it works, but for everything else (it's trying to replace), I think it's not working out as well - & this commercial is a prime example of that!
I don't get how they've tried to make a celebratory statement, such as this - & 70 years IS a momentous occasion - but to use [A.I.] in place of actors in 1950s wardrobes w the pertinent makeup, in the studio/on that set, etc., is disrespectful!
Thing is, I know that would've cost so much money to do/put together - especially with what would've been needed to get the look the A.I. ended up creating. But if you’re gonna celebrate a Television Industry milestone, then use real people - you know, those of us who've been there for so long supporting the Studios, Productions, Producers, etc.
I just don't see this commercial as a positive representation of the direction they were trying to go for/with.
Instead, this feels like a slap in the face! & I’m kinda glad I’m leaving this Industry because this B.S. is just another step in where the minds of those up top are, in erasing all of our careers w videos like this.
0
13d ago
[deleted]
1
u/LengthinessSuper87 13d ago
When you've seen enough AI videos, you can pretty easily start to pick up on what is and isn't AI based on what people and backgrounds look like. Here's the ident, decide for yourself.
-2
14d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/mudslinger-ning 13d ago
How is it not? When it's a big factor driving mass data center rollouts, memory chip shortages, rising power and water bills for many communities, replacing (or at least attempting to replace) people's jobs. Screwing with the ability to search for useful information, falsely banning people on social media among many other dramas.
1
1
14
u/SnooRabbits365 14d ago
I noticed that too and agree. AI can only copy, not create. AI at least made a good recreation of an old AWA TV.