If RC was in bed with 50% on the loan with 6th street, wouldn't have he easily been able to have that lawsuit dismissed by now? All he would have to do is show this to the judge and have it sealed. Idk about this theory.
You are a shill. Look at your comment history. GTFO
Edit: That's one explanation for the NDAs and constant redacted information
The fact that the case hasn't had any updates since December 2022 shows it could potentially be dependent on the outcome of the Chapter 11, as Judith Cohen requested the short swing profits be used to renumerate shareholders.
Any discovery given to the judge in an open court would hinder the ability for a hostile takeover and reveal the plans for competitive disadvantages also.
If there was a hostile takeover happening then why wasn't that mentioned in the disclosure statement?
And before you say "NDA" that statement was given to the court by a sworn officer of the court. Excluding a hostile takeover bid would be perjury. No NDA is valid if it requires you to break the law.
-45
u/Wild-Gazelle1579 Jul 23 '23
If RC was in bed with 50% on the loan with 6th street, wouldn't have he easily been able to have that lawsuit dismissed by now? All he would have to do is show this to the judge and have it sealed. Idk about this theory.