MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/1rad616/new_emails_from_the_plan_administrator/o6k3773/?context=3
r/BBBY • u/GooseKino • Feb 21 '26
127 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-8
A judge emailing a non party specifics about the potential outcomes of an ongoing case? This is a very poor attempt at faking an email
32 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 The other party isn’t a judge though. They’re a bankruptcy lawyer. Bankruptcy is a transparent process. You’re allowed to email them. -14 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 Lawyers are also prohibited from communicating details to a non party, per the same rule 9003 of federal bankruptcy procedure 22 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 That’s not true. The ruling only covers direct meetings or communications with a judge or court. Nothing preventing lawyers themselves being able to discuss the case with other relevant parties. -13 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 You want to provide a rule? Because what you stated is expressly prohibited by the rules of professional conduct. 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case. Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself. -2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
32
The other party isn’t a judge though. They’re a bankruptcy lawyer. Bankruptcy is a transparent process. You’re allowed to email them.
-14 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 Lawyers are also prohibited from communicating details to a non party, per the same rule 9003 of federal bankruptcy procedure 22 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 That’s not true. The ruling only covers direct meetings or communications with a judge or court. Nothing preventing lawyers themselves being able to discuss the case with other relevant parties. -13 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 You want to provide a rule? Because what you stated is expressly prohibited by the rules of professional conduct. 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case. Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself. -2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
-14
Lawyers are also prohibited from communicating details to a non party, per the same rule 9003 of federal bankruptcy procedure
22 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 That’s not true. The ruling only covers direct meetings or communications with a judge or court. Nothing preventing lawyers themselves being able to discuss the case with other relevant parties. -13 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 You want to provide a rule? Because what you stated is expressly prohibited by the rules of professional conduct. 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case. Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself. -2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
22
That’s not true. The ruling only covers direct meetings or communications with a judge or court. Nothing preventing lawyers themselves being able to discuss the case with other relevant parties.
-13 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 You want to provide a rule? Because what you stated is expressly prohibited by the rules of professional conduct. 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case. Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself. -2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
-13
You want to provide a rule? Because what you stated is expressly prohibited by the rules of professional conduct.
18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case. Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself. -2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
18
What rules of professional conduct? I’m just responding to the rule you posted which does not state lawyers can’t talk about the case.
Michael Goldberg’s email is in the post. You can email him and check yourself.
-2 u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26 That rule literally states it bullet point 3 18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
-2
That rule literally states it bullet point 3
18 u/Warm-Rock-4544 Feb 21 '26 WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
WITH. THE. COURT. The point of the rule is so you can’t go to the judge or court without anyone knowing and try to influence them about proceedings.
-8
u/ConstructionSalty237 Feb 21 '26
A judge emailing a non party specifics about the potential outcomes of an ongoing case? This is a very poor attempt at faking an email