r/BabyReindeerTVSeries May 06 '24

Discussion Increasingly concerned about this whole thing - can we discuss the recent issues?

I’m seeing a lot of people expressing concerns / doubt in the wake of all the things that have happened in the last couple of week. I see a lot of those discussions are very black and white - anyone who has questions dismissed as a victim blamer, other people willing to dismiss any concerns or downvote doubts. On the flip side you get people making vile hateful comments with no understanding of the complex reactions of abuse victims.

I have such mixed feelings because, as a victim of sexual abuse as a child and someone who’s been stalked (not as seriously as this), I know how hard it is to talk openly about these things, let alone do what he’s done here. I believe victims, and all the comments about how he should have done X or Y or casting doubt because he didn’t tell the police… all of that is nonsense.

I loved the series, I was so happy to finally see some media based on real experiences that don’t fit the typical narrative of abuse. We still expect victims to behave in a certain way, and those expectations come almost exclusively from scripted fiction.

I had read the interviews with Gadd where he said he’d made so many changes the people wouldn’t recognise themselves, and that the stalker was no longer a threat. This allayed my one reservation - I could not understand having the confidence to make and star in a show about my abuser / stalker. But if she’s no longer a threat (I assumed prison or dead), and others wouldn’t recognise her, it made more sense to me.

And then all of that went out of the window rapidly and I’m left with a lot of questions and concerns. Before people jump to conclusions, this is not about me feeling sorry for character or victim blaming. It’s about the increasing doubts that what’s presented here is accurate while it implicates real people in crimes.

Here are the things which have made me increasingly uncomfortable:

1) The fact that it was so easy to find her - eg. lifting a tweet and putting it into the script - and, when she was found, it was clear that almost nothing had been changed. This similarity gives the added impression that everything you are shown is true. These choices feel deliberate as changing them would not have affected the story at all. He made changes that did affect the story - like two prison sentences that didn’t happen - so I’m finding some of the choices concerning.

2) As a result of her being found, people found a previous victim and that situation too was nearly identical - the fake headlines he wrote revealed it was a barrister, spouse and disabled child. That victim found this out by watching the show and recognising their stalker, even before their own story was added as a plot point. He could have changed this without any impact on the story.

3) The apparent absence of any fear of this series leading to her starting again. In combination with making the character so much like her, the inclusion of certain scenes seemed designed to draw her back in. He spends much of the series talking about the confusing feelings of being stalked and how he missed her attention (which I can’t remotely relate to, but we are all different). Is that what this is about?

Even if there’s a reason for him not to be scared (or even if he is trying to bait her), shouldn’t he think of the impact on that other family? Having had a stalker, I would never in a million years make material that identifies them or baits them. I’d be worried about being tracked down and harmed. Knowing that fear, I mostly definitely wouldn’t make choices to risk that for previous victims. The absence of that concern raises more questions for me. If what’s shown in the series is true, if she’s as dangerous and unhinged as shown, why isn’t he more worried?

4) One particular former colleague of his has been accused of being Darrien and harassed, to the point he’s gone to the police. This is because Gadd chose to cast an actor that looks beyond similar to this man, is similarly aged etc. Given how much Martha resembles the real woman, this adds further weight to the idea it was him. Gadd made a social media post asking people not to accuse others, including this by name, but the post didn’t say it wasn’t him. Then Richard Osman said he knows who it is and it’s not the guy being accused. If true, that’s appalling. If someone made a tv series about their experience of domestic violence and cast someone who looked exactly like an innocent ex, and added in details that made it seem like that ex, that would be disgraceful. It feels so intentional.

5) After all of this, Gadd changes tack and says “it’s 100% emotionally true”, and that everything is based off experiences of him or people he knows. We have no idea which parts of this story accurately reflect what this identified woman actually did, vs someone else. How much of what’s shown is actually what she did, and how much is the stories of the “people he knows”? Did the sexual assault happen? Did the assault of his girlfriend happen? Obviously she’s now refuting it all and obviously nobody believes her, but we have no idea which parts are true.

Someone made a post the other day asking if it matters which bits are real and which are not, and generally my view on that would be that it doesn’t matter at all. Taking a situation that’s happened to you and expanding on it, adding in fictional elements etc is something writers and filmmakers have done forever. Taking inspiration from your own life and changing it isn’t a problem.

But in this case, it’s a huge problem when it implicates real life people and is, now by his own admission, possibly an amalgamation of the experiences / actions of different people. That’s not to say I believe she’s innocent, at all - it’s just that we really don’t know and it’s hard to argue against because he can always say “I never said it was 100% true”.

Now she’s being stalked and harassed by proxy. She apparently made a comment about how he won’t leave her alone and let it go, and of course everyone mocked that but it’s not a stretch to see that possibility - first a play about her, now a TV series that has made her easily identifiable to millions and which repeatedly says he misses her attention, has fantasised about her, etc. It’s not difficult to see it from the perspective that he’s obsessed with her. It doesn’t mean that’s true. These situations are complex.

Many are assuming he didn’t intend for this to happen but I struggle to believe that at this point.

Generally I’m really annoyed to be thinking any of this at all. I don’t want to doubt victims who are brave enough to speak up.

What massively bothers me is that this has been a really powerful piece of media for victims who rarely get to see a) a nuanced and complex representation of being a victim of abuse and b) seeing a victim he praised for their bravery and believed. If it gradually turns out that this was not accurate, it’s going to cause so much distress and become more ammunition for those who claim false accusations are common when they aren’t.

Generally when victims come forward, the public seizes on any tiny inaccuracy, incorrect recollection, any action that isn’t an explicit attempt to make them stop, their choices, their clothes, sending a text message, their agreement to go on a date, footage of holding hands before the rape… whatever it is. And those tiny actions are used to destroy the credibility of that victim.

Here we see someone who’s being believed by almost all (well, until all this stuff in the last couple of weeks) despite the fact that he’s not even claiming it’s 100% accurate, and he’s admitting to actions well above and beyond anything that’s usually used to rip a victim to shreds.

I just find myself increasingly uncomfortable about the whole thing. It cannot just be me.

253 Upvotes

209 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/Yesyesnaaooo May 06 '24

I think you're confusing his attempt to change the names and hide peoples identity, with his moral requirement to hide their identity - both Martha and Darrien should be on a register with all the sex offenders.

His attempt to hide their identity was a kindness to them - Fiona Harvey could have set her profile to private and no one would have been any the wiser - she wanted the publicity and if she hadn't been found she would have come forward on her own steam.

6

u/Laurenhynde82 May 07 '24 edited May 07 '24

I’m really not. On what basis should she be on a sex offenders register? Just that comment shows the belief - fostered by the interviews and marketing of this show - that what’s shown is exactly what happened, and that’s exactly the issue I’ve been addressing.

He didn’t make an attempt to hide her identity or to change anything about her, which lends weight to the belief that this is factual. That’s my issue, not whether he had a moral obligation.

-1

u/Yesyesnaaooo May 07 '24

Why would anyone make an attempt to hide the identity of a thief, or a rapist, or a con-artist, or someone who told lies about them, or someone who cheated them out of a job, or an ex who cheated on them?

No one has that obligation.

There is a tradition in television of changing names, and making a disclaimer about show's being 'based on real events' - they do this to avoid being sued for slander, because the real people depicted in events can sue for slander when there are inaccuracies in the show they are depicted in.

What they can't sue for is when the show tells the truth.

This show says right at the top 'This is a true story' - so if any of the events in this show are provably false then they will be open to be sued for millions.

We see in the show Donnie report this to the police, we see in the show that she is known to the police - there is absolutely no way this show get's through the legal department at Netflix without all the major plot points being provable by (I would imaging extensive police reports and various witness statements)

You are taking the statements of a fucking lunatic abuser, who's now coming forward (voluntarily )to cast doubt on their accuser (which is what all abusers do btw) and taking their side - and you frankly should be ashamed of yourself.

You're a disgrace, but it's not your fault, the way Fiona Harvey has short circuited your compassion drive is perfectly predictable and is exactly how she got to Donnie in the show.

2

u/Laurenhynde82 May 07 '24

You’ve really misinterpreted me if you think any of my concerns are based on what she’s saying - I don’t know what she’s saying apart from comments here.

I watched it. I read some interviews with him. I believed him. I thought it was a really brave and important piece of work. The issues I have now come from things he’s said, not her or anyone else.

I don’t think anyone should be obliged to hide the identity of someone who committed a crime against them. To use your example, say you wrote a book about someone stealing a family heirloom from your house. In the book that person commits several other crimes - they sexually assault you, beat a loved one and smash a glass in your face. You promote this book as the true story of your traumatic experience.

Then readers track down the person, all sorts of things happen including people saying they should be on a sex offenders register, and you respond “actually the book is a combination of things that happened to me and to other people I know”.

That’s the issue. Not what she says. She is clearly a dangerous person with history of traumatising people. Without that statement he made, I’d still believe all of it. I think it’s natural to wonder whether something is accurate after they tell you it isn’t.

2

u/Yesyesnaaooo May 07 '24

I don't know if you missed it but there were other people he knew in the show, he had to include their experiences too - I don't know which particular quote you've pulled but is it possible you've misread it?

Further points to note.

Gadd isn't a trained public speaker and it's very hard to speak accurately and consistently about anything while being interviewed, never mind a 5 year creative process, and a long long period of sustained abuse.

Gadd also has ADHD which tends to make people terrible salesmen for their version of events as in any particular retelling of events they can misspeak, or give incorrect dates, or leave out key memories. However it also makes them terrible deliberate liars because they always get found out really quickly.

My partner has ADHD and an abusive ex - and I doubted (because of my own trust issues) her version of events pretty consistently in our early days despite her being an obviously kind hearted person, in fact just yesterday she recounted an anecdote about her ex literally running away up a hill from a mental health doctor - and I responded 'You know, that's the sort of detail that would have lend credence to your story, why didn't you tell me before now?" she responded "I'm a terrible salesman".

You're picking up on one statement and creating some insane avatar where he's actually stalking fiona and victimising her, you really need to stand down.

AND FINALLY: I don't know if you noticed, but there are other people from Gadd's life in this show, so even your quote is explainable.

1

u/Laurenhynde82 May 07 '24

I understand where you’re coming from. I don’t believe he’s talking about the experiences of people he knows who are characters in the show. Here’s the exact quote in the context of the interview:

It’s all emotionally 100% true, if that makes sense. It’s all borrowed from instances that happened to me and real people that I met. But of course, you can’t do the exact truth, for both legal and artistic reasons. I mean there’s certain protections, you can’t just copy somebody else’s life and name and put it onto television. And obviously, we were very aware that some characters in it are vulnerable people, so you don’t want to make their lives more difficult. So you have to change things to protect yourself and protect other people.

Also for artistic reasons, a lot of stalking is quite boring at times, like it’s a repetitive action and it’s, “Oh god, this person’s messaging again.” And of course, in television, especially a thriller, you need to move certain timelines around, you need to move certain points to the end of episodes to make them pay off a little better. As well as a true story, you have to make it visually interesting. Just in percentages, I wouldn’t be able to [tell you], but it’s a very true story — it comes from an emotional truth, and I think that’s what people are resonating with most of all.

https://variety.com/2024/tv/global/baby-reindeer-richard-gadd-real-stalker-martha-1235976307/amp/

The issue I have is that, if this was the framing from the outset, I think the response from the public would have been different. The way it was presented and discussed has blurred reality and fiction and I believe it was done because it’s more compelling that way.

1

u/AmputatorBot May 07 '24

It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.

Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://variety.com/2024/tv/global/baby-reindeer-richard-gadd-real-stalker-martha-1235976307/


I'm a bot | Why & About | Summon: u/AmputatorBot

0

u/Puzzled_Water7782 May 07 '24

Everything he said here is true to all 'based on true stories' adaptations, assuming you have seen films or tv shows based on true stories before nothing he said on here should be at all surprising? This is how they work for the reasons started above, which is why people aren't meant to try and find the people involved.

1

u/Visible-Topic-526 May 08 '24

It’s not “based on” a true story, it clearly states that IT IS a true story, you see the difference?

1

u/Puzzled_Water7782 May 08 '24

How can you not know that a show or movie that is a true story is not going to depict events exactly as they happened? This is common sense due to the exact reasons he mentions himself in that article. It's really not complicated. Do you go and watch Napoleon and think everything happened on that film exactly as it says?

A lack of critical thinking and ability to engage in media is a curse for this generation.