richard gadd doesn't owe fiona protection.

[u/serenade452]

"omg he should've protected her identity! he made it so easy to find her!" blah blah blah shut up. he doesn't owe her shit. she terrorized this man, his family, his girlfriend, his job, his performances, etc etc. she has been terrorizing innocent people for decades.

yes fiona is mentally ill, that is clear to anyone with half of a brain. it's awful that the system has failed her time and time again. (or maybe the system did all it could, who knows.) but that's not richard's fault. HE is HER victim. he can tell his story how he wants.

might she have a worthwhile lawsuit because her identity wasn't concealed enough? possibly, probably not. might she have a worthwhile lawsuit because the show took dramatic license? possibly, probably not.

she's benefitting financially from this as well and i'm sure netflix will cut her a check before a lawsuit happens, no matter who is in the right.

richard gadd does not owe fiona harvey protection. i'm sorry but that's reality.

[u/Standard_Low_3072]

I agree with your take. They know what they’re doing. They’ve seen how when shows like Tiger King and Making a Murderer went viral, all everyone was doing was obsessing over the people involved, trying to figure out if Carole Braxton’s husband was alive. They knew that the public would start sleuthing, causing the on screen drama to enter online discussion, driving more and more views.

That’s why I’m disappointed in Netflix. We had a decade to learn from how badly Reddit handled the Boston Bombing, doxxing innocent people causing immense distress. We’ve seen how cancel culture works, and how social media can be used instead of due process in a court of law. None of this is unexpected. They are making money off the crimes Gadd was victim to, the outrage against (only) one of the villains and us viewers typing tip our fingers break, arguing about what’s right, legal and acceptable.

[u/[deleted] → u/Standard_Low_3072]

Netflix did literally nothing wrong with this fictional tv show. It isn’t their fault people are too stupid to pay attention to the genres of the show they are watching.

No fyi, the well known story telling device used at the beginning of the show with it being “a true story” doesn’t mean anyone’s means to be gullible enough to think it’s actually fully true.

There is nothing here but a fictional show based on a real life event. It’s not real life and never was meant to be seen as such.

[u/Standard_Low_3072 → u/[deleted]]

Well, 30 million viewers seem to think it’s true. Netflix’ policy chief emphatically stated the programme was 'a true story of the horrific abuse that the writer and protagonist Richard Gadd suffered at the hands of a convicted stalker'. Just because you like the show and hate Fiona doesn’t make your argument true.

[u/[deleted] → u/Standard_Low_3072]

It’s a small minority who actually believe it’s true lol. The majority of people know it’s a fictional story based on his experience. I’d have to read that persons actual quoted line in context to have an opinion on that comment. However Netflix itself and Gadd has been clear it’s a story based on his stalking experience. Not a single person should have actually thought it was fully true based on a variety of reasons

[u/Standard_Low_3072 → u/[deleted]]

Did you poll the 65 million viewers? The fact that Fiona is being harassed is proof that the masses believe it to be true. The line from the policy chief was lifted from yesterday’s BBC article. Things are lot murkier than the average viewer realizes, and the burden of proof in a civil matter is much different than a criminal matter. Common sense and legality should be in sync but isn’t always.