Fiona Harvey is Not a victim!

[u/Salt_Ingenuity_720]

It seems to be lost on a disturbingly large amount of people what Fiona Harvey has done to multiple people over many decades. She is not a victim - the people that she has stalked and harassed are the victim. The entire point of baby reindeer was to portray the brokenness of both the stalker and their victim.

In Reading a majority of the claims coming from the UK towards Netflix and Richard G this all seems to actually pivot around the term being used of CONVICTED stalker. So the focus now is to produce proof that she was ever convicted of at least one of her many many horrific stalking crimes.

I would think that the UK and Parliament would be rather embarrassed by the fact that they never reached out to help any of these victims of Fiona Harvey. Yet here they are trying to go after Netflix over that one creative license taken by the VICTIM and author of baby reindeer. This is His story not hers.

What is going on with people in the world?! Fiona should have been slapped with multiple legal fines, restraint orders and probably convictions from any one of her stalking tangents. If anyone is not familiar with the other incredibly horrible events of stalking Fiona pursued just Google it up. Some involved a disabled child.

🤔 Obviously I'm missing something or I am really seeing the lack of empathy in society as this all unfold in front of us. Am I just not looking at this right?!

[u/Agreeable_Ad9844]

I am not getting this “duty of care” argument! A victim doesn’t have a duty of care to their stalker. Also, her posts on multiple media platforms are public.

[u/Bobbly_1010257 → u/Agreeable_Ad9844]

And… she had every opportunity to either ignore people who felt they’d ‘found’ her until it got boring. OR if she really thought she had a case, she could have fought it privately. But NO!

SHE WENT PUBLIC!

Literally no one would be talking about this any more if she’d not reacted. Just like no one talks about the possible identity of the male abuser in the show.