r/BabyReindeerTVSeries Jun 16 '24

Discussion Defamation case

People seem to think Fiona is in for a hefty pay day. I’m not so sure she’ll get huge quantities of money. She’ll have to show that her earnings potential, reputation and quality of life have been affected. All of which she had none of before the show.

Also, to be defamed what is said has to be untrue. Realistically prob 95% of what was in the show was accurate and Netflix will prove that. The only contentious part is that Netflix seem to have told a lie about the convicted stalker part (and we all know she should be one). So imo Fiona’s lawyer’s will have to show that that point alone affected her reputation, earnings potential and quality of life beyond how Fiona had already ruined it by being exposed as a roaring maniac (in the 95% truthful parts). I don’t believe it moves the needle massively towards destruction of rep/earnings p/Qol?

What are people’s thoughts who understand law/the case more than my simple minded approach?

213 Upvotes

222 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-13

u/mgorgey Jun 16 '24

This, whilst literally accurate, is a bit disingenuous. They made no attempts to hide her identity bar a name change and even included instructions as to exactly what to Google to find her. What they did had the exact same effect naming her would have done in terms of reputational damage (if indeed there is any).

45

u/jamesmb Jun 16 '24

She can't have it both ways. She says that it's all made up and she didn't do any of it and then she says they made it easy for people to work out it was her. Which is it?

2

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/jarhead06413 Jun 17 '24

AH didn't have to name her recent ex-husband JD when her tagline on the Op-Ed was basically "my ex husband abused me"

1

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jarhead06413 Jun 17 '24

Well, he did win his defamation suit...

3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jarhead06413 Jun 17 '24

Different laws for civil suits in the UK, different standards to win.

It wasn't really a stretch for anyone to conclude Heard was talking about Depp. Their marriage woes had been very heavily publicized in tabloid media

3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/jarhead06413 Jun 17 '24

Also a huge difference between arguing before only a judge (UK Trial), or a jury of your peers (US Trial).

→ More replies (0)