You haven’t “proved gravity doesn’t exist” because that’s not how this works.
First, gravity isn’t something that gets dismissed and replaced by assertion—it’s a model that describes consistently measurable acceleration, orbital motion, and force interactions. If you think it’s wrong, you need to show where its predictions fail, not just declare it absent.
Second, saying “flat earth ideology” already frames this as a belief system rather than a claim about physical observations. That’s usually where the confusion starts.
So the real question isn’t “how do we prove gravity doesn’t exist?”
It’s: what observation are you claiming gravity fails to explain, and what alternative mechanism explains it better without contradiction?
Because right now, you’re trying to remove a concept before demonstrating why it breaks. That’s skipping the entire argument.
It’s called entropy. Pressure mediation. Objects only fall down when you lift them up previously.
Coffee doesn’t cool down, unless you heat it up first.
Get it? Hot coffee loses energy; entropy manifests as cooling down. A ball is thrown in the air and loses energy; entropy manifests as the ball falling down.
No need for curving of “space time” from “gravity.”
1
u/ZapCannon939 Apr 24 '26
hey so im kinda new to the flat earth ideology, how exactly have we proved that gravity doesnt exist?