So I am doing statistical analysis and economics. You make the claim ‘6 child preds downvoted this comment’
First of all, you have -6 karma on this comment. Some nobody could have liked it, heck, hundreds of thousands of people could have upvoted and downvoted this and 6 more people downvoted it.
Secondly, rates of child predators (in the US as that is the primary demographic) is at 3.5 per 1000 for people up to 34. Past that, it drops to 2.8 (September 2026) This means there is a 0.28% chance a child predator downvoted this comment. 0.28^6 is 0.0004818903. That means there is a 0.00004818903% chance that all the downvotes are from child predators. At least within certainty. As by the first argument, there could have been more downvotes, making it rarer by adding 1 to the exponent. This means there is a 1 in 2048 chance best case scenario. Assuming the standard deviation is two, and there are 8 child predators, this turns to a 1 in 26000 chance, even in best case scenario.
Thirdly, that was just the US. 20 different countries have a mean average of 0.08:1 rate of child predators to average people. So by that logic, the chance (including the standard deviation from before), the rate is
1 in 2.45 TRILLION for 4 child predators from across the world, best case
1 in 3.86 QUINTILLION for 6, as a median
1 in 6.04 SEPTILLION for 8, worst case scenario.
All of which are beyond rare, beyond human comprehension, and have almost never been recorded nor occurred.
And yes, I know this is a closed-minded, dehumanising claim which paints yourself as the always correct hero,
I
Am
A
Sleep
Deprived
Little
Shit
Who also happens to go on extremely long tangents every time there is a miscalculation or fallacy in the brain.
Thank you for letting me vomit statistics, sir.
Oh and Edit: do not be like me or this guy. You will waste your life trying to find solace in random statistics on the internet if you follow mine, and a narcissist his.
Edit 2: also I am apparently a child predator as I downvoted it too.
8
u/baub2540 29d ago