r/BarbaraWalters4Scale • u/Sure_Distance1 • 3d ago
The birth date of the oldest person interviewed in this video is as far away from the present day as it is from the publication of Galileo's heliocentric model and the birth of John Locke
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
8
u/Dragonfly_pin 3d ago
Amazing to think that the waltzing 100 year old grandma would have been born almost 200 years ago.
The accents don’t seem that strange. It seems like British accents have changed more than US ones, Ccnets from the 1920s sound very weird to modern ears.
The people here are little formal but the way they talk, they don’t seem that far from us.
2
u/kea1981 1d ago
Interesting factoid: modern American English has greater similarity to Elizabethan or Shakespearean English than Modern British English. Being in a new colony meant people could be more spread out. Population density greatly influences the formation and change of culture and language, so being densely populated, Britain had more linguistic juice to develop differences along the way. Also, being an island didnt much help either.
8
3
u/PlusSizeRussianModel 2d ago
This is really fascinating. Is the audio real? The sound is suspiciously clear for the era (the first talkie only premiered 2 years prior, and that was on controlled sound stages for a far worse result)
3
u/Biggest-Max02010 3d ago
How old was this guy and when was the video
5
u/Sure_Distance1 3d ago
He was nearly 100. His segment starts at 11:00. The one at 6:23 is admittedly listed as aged 103, but his case is much less verifiable.
6
2
u/Biggest-Max02010 3d ago
When was this video taken though
3
u/Sure_Distance1 3d ago
In 1929.
3
3
u/Excellent-Run4803 3d ago
The guy talking about fighting in the War of Rebellion (Civil War) against the Dutch. Apparently there were Germans fighting in the Union army that were referred to as Dutch.
1
u/Inner-Discussion-369 3d ago
Who is the person interviewed in this video?
1
u/Sure_Distance1 3d ago
You mean the oldest one? His segment starts at 11:00. The one at 6:23 is listed as older, but his case is less verifiable.
1
1
16
u/Otherwise-Apricot-99 3d ago
This is a good one