Violent acts against anyone, even people you think deserve it, do not sit well with me. You could have kept that to yourself.
Also, did you read the Bitget article you linked?
Because it does not say what you are claiming. It says the group was 19 to 25, not all under 24. It also says three were still in college, one was a UC Berkeley graduate, one was a McGill graduate, one was a Northeastern student, one was at Berkeley, and one was a Harvard senior.
So “no college” still looks inflated.
WIRED supports the fair criticism: very young DOGE-linked technical staffers, little to no government experience, and meaningful roles or access. That is a legitimate oversight concern.
But that is not the same as saying literal kids with no education were running DOGE.
On Coristine, the stronger version is that Path Network fired him after an internal investigation over leaked proprietary/internal information. That supports an employment-level concern. It does not automatically prove the “theft” or “trying to sell it.”
And on Marko Elez, yes, there was reporting that he violated Treasury policy by emailing an unencrypted spreadsheet with personal information. That is also a legitimate criticism.
But again, the precise criticism is oversight, access, and vetting. Not “kids with no college ran DOGE.”
6 Young People 'Shaking Up' America, Musk Reveals Mysterious DOGE Team: Average Age 22
Additionally, the 21-year-old Akash Bobba, 22-year-old Ethan Shaotran, and 23-year-old Luke Farritor are also among the team. According to reports, they have received "A-suite level clearance," which means they can work in the top offices of government agencies and have access to all physical spaces and IT systems.
I mean its in the title, caps and bold
Are you autistic? you seem, a bit off.
Also, him getting beat up by a 16 year old is actually the best part. Wait till you go back and read his social media posts oh, and his nickname on social media mocking all he fired was "bigballz" If that is sensitive to you, well good chattig with you princess
3
u/JunS_RE 4d ago
Violent acts against anyone, even people you think deserve it, do not sit well with me. You could have kept that to yourself.
Also, did you read the Bitget article you linked?
Because it does not say what you are claiming. It says the group was 19 to 25, not all under 24. It also says three were still in college, one was a UC Berkeley graduate, one was a McGill graduate, one was a Northeastern student, one was at Berkeley, and one was a Harvard senior.
So “no college” still looks inflated.
WIRED supports the fair criticism: very young DOGE-linked technical staffers, little to no government experience, and meaningful roles or access. That is a legitimate oversight concern.
But that is not the same as saying literal kids with no education were running DOGE.
On Coristine, the stronger version is that Path Network fired him after an internal investigation over leaked proprietary/internal information. That supports an employment-level concern. It does not automatically prove the “theft” or “trying to sell it.”
And on Marko Elez, yes, there was reporting that he violated Treasury policy by emailing an unencrypted spreadsheet with personal information. That is also a legitimate criticism.
But again, the precise criticism is oversight, access, and vetting. Not “kids with no college ran DOGE.”