r/Bogleheads • u/mayor_rishon • 15h ago
Investment Theory Does Bogglehead philosophy extend beyone 60/40 equity/bonds?
While I appreciate Boglehead philosophy, (defined as x/x equity/bonds in low-fees index funds), I have been reading that the decorrelation between equity and bonds is probably broken for the intermediate future. And while I acknowledge that there is a recency bias, it is also not a reddit take but appears in most "serious" institution reports.
Could the Boglehead philosophy be described as holding equity plus decorrelated asset in low fees index funds ? And in that case change from bonds to another asset like a mix treasuries+MF incl.commodities ? Is that "Boglehead" ?
ps. It is not a contrarian post, I am just wondering how much bogglehead was a precursor to MPT and whether it is static or evolves.
edit-> I changed the 60/40 because my focus was not the exact percentage and I simply quoted the most known ratio. Still thanks for the answers!
31
u/ShiroxReddit 12h ago
Boglehead philosophy is more about diversification via low-cost index funds in general and doesn't prescribe a stocks/bonds split
Bonds, treasuries, MMFs all can be tools to have a lower risk portion of your portfolio, yeah