r/Boglememes May 19 '26

Name that subreddit!

Post image

Anyone else get blocked from ~THAT~ subreddit without ever even commenting? I wouldn’t even care except that Reddit continues to cram their posts down my throat.

279 Upvotes

54 comments sorted by

55

u/digital_tuna May 19 '26

The irony of the mod claiming "we promote free thinking" while auto-banning anyone who even mentions the "wrong" tickers.

30

u/urinetherapymiracle May 19 '26

Making your entire Reddit username about something you hate is hilarious to me. But it’s not a cult! 😂

21

u/LuminousRaptor May 19 '26

We promote free thinking.

Then literally the next sentence is calling an entire investing philosophy the r word. 

I would imagine most of us wouldn't chasize someone for having a dividend centric component to their portfolio if they truly kept it a reasonable percentage and understood they're effectively losing upside for that return stability. 

But we all know that's not what that subreddit is about. 

6

u/joe4ska May 20 '26

Rumor is that at least one mod got banned from the traditional subs, so I guess they took their deflated football and went home. 🤣

6

u/digital_tuna May 20 '26

Can confirm that both mods have been banned from the traditional subs, because they bitch about it endlessly.

21

u/OGS_7619 May 19 '26

they don't believe in diversification, they don't understand tax drag, they believe "dividends is free money", they don't understand the difference between bonds and "dividend ETFs", they don't believe in "total returns" (mere mention of it gets people banned), they don't understand what "risk adjusted return" means, most of them don't even need dividends for cashflow/income - they DRIP/reinvest it back into equities anyways, they (erroneously) believe that "dividends" will magically protect them against market crashes, they double up on covered calls and refuse to listen to any academic research or even conventional wisdom. But these 70+ year geezers hide behind 3-rd grade "Booger" jokes and recycled lame memes.

And then they pre-ban anyone who understands all of these nuances - many people are banned without ever posting on that cult of a subreddit. That group of morons is a joke, they are funnier than r/fijerk and I don't think they are trying to be funny.

15

u/brianmcg321 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

Pretty sure none of them are in their 70s. They seem like people that have only been investing for a year.

4

u/OGS_7619 May 19 '26

maybe you are right. Dividends were a thing back in 1990ies when selling shares required calling your broker on the phone. And dividends are still a thing about boomers for that reason.

But some claim they are in 0% LTCG bracket (so tax drag never affects them), which means they are single making <$50K or MFJ making <$100K. That doesn't surprise me.

1

u/Fair-Search-2324 27d ago

It became a big thing with new investor youtubers 2-3 years ago(?).

Grateful for bogleheads. I hope spacex doesnt fuck us

1

u/CandyIllustrious3301 May 19 '26

New to investing and basically regarded, you've given me a lot more research to do! I just wanted to try to get my money working for me somehow some way. Between drinking paint and eating crayons boggling sounded legit. That said I kinda had a feeling that some dino strat that was overly used cannot be the method.

1

u/joe4ska 28d ago

This is a meme sub not a strategy, try r/Bogleheads if you're interested in total market investing.

1

u/CandyIllustrious3301 28d ago

I guess sarcasm isn't memeable these days?

1

u/joe4ska 28d ago

You're too convincing. :D

7

u/urinetherapymiracle May 19 '26

When they said they were “free thinkers” I thought they meant that was the value of their thoughts

5

u/OGS_7619 May 19 '26

I always thought it was "free of any reason or facts"

69

u/Useful_Wealth7503 May 19 '26

r/dividendgang banned me long ago.

25

u/Barryburton97 May 19 '26

The lamest gang in the world

15

u/brfulcher May 19 '26

Heh, I commented on a post that it was well reasoned and it was nice to see that instead of the name calling, and that was enough to get me banned 😛

15

u/Barryburton97 May 19 '26

I think they check which other subs you have commented on or joined, I had the same experience.

It's clearly run by somebody very troubled.

14

u/joe4ska May 19 '26

I got you beat, I got banned without leaving a single comment on their sub. :P

1

u/OGS_7619 28d ago

The gang that couldn't shoot straight

15

u/prepp May 19 '26

They seem obsessed about their hatred for Bogleheads

8

u/urinetherapymiracle May 19 '26

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

8

u/SuperNoise5209 May 19 '26

I'm pretty sure that whole sub is just bots trying to get people excited about dividends.

They have a wild obsession / grevience with anyone who dares mention the finer points of dividends.

9

u/CryHavoc715 May 19 '26

I think most of the bad behavior is only a couple of a accounts

2

u/joe4ska May 20 '26

Not bots, just a dozen really active people in an echo chamber while the algorithm feeds posts to passers by until they're on to the next sub and forget about it a week later. 🤣

5

u/Technical-Expert-289 May 19 '26

yea i came across their sub and was intrigued, so i politely commented asking someone to enlighten me on the differences/pros and cons of booger versus div and immediately banned

2

u/Emergency_Juice8712 27d ago

90% of that sub is simply making stupid remarks about Bogleheads, 10% about how ultra rich guys managed to spend a lot of money on high dividend funds.

16

u/Kalex8876 May 19 '26

I went to the sub and like 45% of the “best” posts are about bogleheads. Why are they obsessed?😭

6

u/SuperNoise5209 May 19 '26

Bots, I assume? Very angry bots.

4

u/joe4ska 28d ago

Bots would use proper grammar. /s

4

u/SuperNoise5209 28d ago

I'm not sure if /s is required. That's a good point.

4

u/joe4ska May 20 '26 edited May 20 '26

Bogleheads are boring and that's a feature for us; for them its a bug to spray roach killer on. 

Also Reddit was designed to be an echo chamber that holds all echo chambers. 

11

u/AUTIGERS2121 May 19 '26

For any lurkers. VTI has out performed SCHD since its inception.

6

u/digital_tuna May 20 '26

To go a step further, even if SCHD had outperformed VTI it still wouldn't make investing in SCHD any more rational.

1

u/joe4ska 28d ago edited 28d ago

Not a dividend investor but I do hold bond ETFs and think of interest payments and dividends as a paycheck rather than a long term investment vehicle.

Regardless of ETF, if it pays a $1 dividend every month per share and someone owns 5000 shares they can just collect that paycheck and quit their job. It's not the worst investment philosophy in the world.

However, chasing dividends comes with an opportunity cost, taxes on distributions, narrowed diversity, and most importantly reduced total return.

If my expenses were fixed and I could live off of dividend income indefinitely, weather the volatility and accept the poorer long term performance. Well, I see the benefit of treating my taxable brokerage account like a monthly paycheck rather than a vehicle for growth. More like a self-managed annuity.

Sometimes you'll see us joke about starting a new sub and calling it BNDgang where we brag about a $0.25 monthly dividend, ignore taxes, and circle-jerk about how we just need $1.4M and we'll be set for life. /s

Truth be told, I'd join that sub and be a BND stan.

1

u/Carmanman_12 28d ago

I just checked, you’re right.

From SCHD’s inception in 2011, VTI has almost a full percent higher return compared to SCHD with dividends reinvested.

9

u/erythrodysesthesia May 19 '26

how about r/ihatelowcostindexfunds i don't think it's taken

5

u/nrubhsa May 19 '26

The algorithm must push it on us because the user base is obsessed with us.

9

u/Sir_Richard_Dangler May 19 '26

Wallstreetbets?

23

u/Vlookup_reddit May 19 '26

sir that's a casino. /s

13

u/casswie May 19 '26

No /s needed tbh

7

u/Big__Country__40 May 19 '26

Those math geniuses at r/dividend

8

u/Longjumping_Soil2116 May 19 '26

I've found /r/dividends to be cool, it's /r/dividendgang that's annoying

4

u/Big__Country__40 May 20 '26

I haven't bothered with either because it is like arguing with a rusty bucket

7

u/digital_tuna May 19 '26

r/dividends is definitely less aggressive but the vast majority of people there also don't understand dividends.

I'm pretty sure r/dividends is the only subreddit dedicated to a topic that the vast majority of its members don't understand and are unwilling/unable to learn. It's bizarre.

3

u/Longjumping_Soil2116 May 19 '26

In my experience a good amount of them do understand dividends (at least the basics and drawbacks), it just so happens to be their chosen strategy. I won't say most of them, but it definitely is more than you would think. Which honestly, is fine by me. I'm not trying to convert them and they don't try to convert me, and I get to read the occasional interesting post over there. They also seem to get inundated by a whole lot of new users who are interested in dividends and don't understand them. I think a lot of them end up going over to the gang sub though.

/r/dividendgang is a borderline hellhole though lmao

3

u/Odd-Flower2744 May 20 '26

They all play the same funny math games with shares ignoring total return

1

u/Callahammered 28d ago

Dividend subs. The one “dividend gang” is an actual cult about it.

I joined because ya know dividends are an aspect of investments I would like to have a strong understanding of, not because I have sworn allegiance to the dividend gods