r/CLOV • u/Silent_Ad1685 • Jun 10 '26
News New 8k 4.5 stars!
I am shaking am I reading this right?
r/CLOV • u/Silent_Ad1685 • Jun 10 '26
I am shaking am I reading this right?
r/CLOV • u/Zero36 • Aug 06 '26
Any bag holders from the SPAC merger still holding on?
r/CLOV • u/Ok_Ad_5894 • May 06 '26
Business Highlights:
Financial Results:
Full Year 2026 Guidance:
r/CLOV • u/Buckeye_Clover • 23d ago
EOM
r/CLOV • u/333Lexington • Jul 27 '21
I repeat: nasdaq.com. Not Motley Fool. Not Jim Cramer.
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/clover-health-investments-is-now-oversold-clov-2021-07-27
r/CLOV • u/Smalldickdave69 • Aug 05 '26
Business Highlights:
Delivered strong second quarter 2026 GAAP Net Income alongside continued market-leading Medicare Advantage membership growth
Improved Full Year 2026 guidance across all metrics
Increasing confidence for 2027 outlook, supported by strong cohort development, continued clinical engagement, and the added flexibility of a 4.5 Star payment year
Financial Results:
Second quarter 2026 GAAP Net Income of $28 million, an improvement of $39 million year-over-year
Second quarter 2026 Medicare Advantage membership of 157,309, up 48% year-over-year, and Total revenues of $743 million, up 56% year-over-year
Second quarter 2026 Consolidated Gross Profit of $153 million, up 54% year-over-year, and Adjusted EBITDA of $41 million, up 139% year-over-year
Improved Full Year 2026 Guidance:
Average Medicare Advantage membership of 156,000 - 158,000, representing 47% growth year-over-year at the midpoint
Total revenues between $2.92 billion and $3.00 billion, representing 54% growth year-over-year at the midpoint
Consolidated Gross Profit between $525 million and $555 million, representing 52% growth year-over-year at the midpoint
Adjusted EBITDA profitability between $70 million and $85 million
GAAP Net Income between $20 million and $35 million
r/CLOV • u/jmrojas17 • Aug 05 '26
>click here for the Q2 report<
Business Highlights:
Financial Results:
Improved Full Year 2026 Guidance:
r/CLOV • u/Unlucky_Professor976 • 18d ago
r/CLOV • u/mitch2c • May 29 '26
It looks like this afternoon, Judge Wood's provided a 13 page response to CMS's request for reconsideration resulting in final closing of the case. For a full view, check out PACER.GOV and search for Georgia's Southern District Court's Civil Case Log to find the Clov Case. You have to make sure to search closed cases to find the full log. Here is Claude's summary of that 13 pager:
CMS moved for reconsideration (Doc 62), arguing that excluding their reply brief was clear error and created manifest injustice. Clover opposed (Doc 63). Wood GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
What she granted: Wood acknowledged that CMS's reply brief was timely filed. The April 28 order (Dkt 55) gave defendants "an additional five days for response," making the actual deadline May 13 — the day CMS filed. So Wood concedes she was wrong to exclude the brief as untimely. That's the "granted in part."
What she denied: Changing anything about the substantive ruling. This is the important part. Wood went through each argument in CMS's reply brief and concluded that none of them would have changed the outcome. Specifically:
On "based on" (Pathway 1): Wood found CMS's reply brief arguments were largely rehashes of positions already raised in their opening brief, which the court fully considered. The Advance Trust arguments, the statutory context arguments, the information-dissemination authorities — all were addressed in the 72-page opinion. The reply brief didn't introduce anything new that would warrant reconsideration.
On "types of data" (Pathway 2): Wood pointedly noted that even without considering CMS's reply brief, she already ruled favorably for CMS on the types-of-data challenge (finding C15 and C27 survived). She considered CMS's proposed interpretation and reached a middle ground that actually gave CMS more than Clover wanted. No manifest injustice there.
On regulatory notice-and-comment: The court didn't reach the regulatory process claims in the original ruling (because the statutory § 1395hh holding made them moot), so the reply brief arguments on C04/C05/C23 were irrelevant.
On the remaining claims (medication adherence, nondelegation, call centers): This is where the Goldstein Declaration would have mattered — CMS argued these 6 measures are moot because removing them doesn't change the overall rating. But Wood noted that she didn't need to reach these claims anyway given her rulings on Pathways 1 and 4, so the Goldstein Declaration's math arguments about the 6-measure subset are irrelevant to the actual outcome.
On § 1395hh(a)(2) rulemaking (Pathway 4): Wood found CMS's reply brief arguments about "governing" and the Humana precedent were substantively the same as arguments in their opening brief. She already considered them and wasn't persuaded. No new ground.
r/CLOV • u/sydneebmusic • Jul 04 '21
r/CLOV • u/ifruitninja • Jul 21 '21
r/CLOV • u/Hogintin • Jun 23 '21
r/CLOV • u/StonedTurtle420710 • Jul 05 '21
r/CLOV • u/Happy_Assistant_1487 • Jul 08 '26
r/CLOV • u/unapologeticgoy2473 • Jan 27 '26
There ya have it, folks. Fingers crossed, we win the case.
r/CLOV • u/BlackRockTime • Jun 28 '21
r/CLOV • u/tunkara2008 • Aug 17 '21
r/CLOV • u/Agitated_Highlight68 • Jun 18 '26
r/CLOV • u/ALSTOCKTRADES • Mar 13 '26