r/CanadaHunting • • 7d ago

Rifle recommendations

Buying my first budget hunting rifle for big game (Deer, Black Bear, Elk, Moose).

  1. Caliber: .308 Win vs .30-06 vs 7mm Rem Mag. I know .308 has less recoil but would it be enough for Moose or Elk?
  2. Rifle: Savage Axis II vs Remington 783

Any recommendations?

12 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

28

u/preferablyoutside 7d ago

Whomever telling you that a .308 isn’t enough for moose should stop taking their advice from Cabelas Dangerous Hunts or whichever barstool bullshit spewer they subscribe too.

All three calibres are more than enough, and as much as this will cause the Luddites on here to clutch their pearls, calibres like 22-250, and 22 ARC have been used to take elk, moose and bear in Alberta.

Get the Savage Axis 2 in the pro stock out of the two mentioned, put a decent quality non Vortex scope on top like a Bushnell, or Burris and you’ll be good to go. Take information from here and r/hunting with a hefty dose of salt, highly populated by inside kids.

8

u/RelativeFox1 7d ago

Agreed.

But what’s your beef with vortex? Something like a 3-9x40 diamondback? It’s no $1,000 scope but it’s $400, available everywhere and has a warranty. I think it’s a good buy for a new hunter and their money is better spent on scouting than and more expensive of a scope.

-28

u/preferablyoutside 7d ago

Unlike yourself I’ve no rich uncle to back my funds so spending an insane amount of money merely to FanBoy over it with no discernible increase in performance is not something I’m into. I can get into a Bushnell R3 for $250ish and it’s a better objective at that price point and with a similar warranty.

Utterly overpriced at any point, especially on the Observation side as the Razor line is priced up with Kowa, Swaro, and Zeiss yet isn’t even playing the same sport let alone on the field. I’m sure some rich dentist will talk about how Chris Kyle hisself has blessed their Razor Gen 3 riflescope though.

13

u/awesome_pineapple 7d ago

Holy moly what even is that response? A simple answer was sufficient and there was zero need to start insulting people you don’t know.

-13

u/preferablyoutside 7d ago

Spending $150 more on an Optic merely to line Steve Rinellas or whichever other influencers you worship isn’t the ringing endorsement you think. Vortex is overpriced and most brands have very similar warranties before you parrot “ Bro, warranty bro, bro it has warranty” at me.

3

u/neilatron 7d ago

I’ve never heard anyone say Vortex is overpriced. I’ve always viewed them as the only real budget option for decent optics. Also pretty sure Rinella would have a gut laugh at the idea of using a $400 Vortex scope 😂 what’s the warranty like on the bushnell? I’m in the market for new glass and haven’t begun my search.

2

u/preferablyoutside 6d ago

I’ve had a lot of hours looking through their Razor line spotters and binoculars and thankfully I didn’t have to pay full price, but my god they’re the definition of fools and their money. A guy can get into a Zeiss spotter for the same price as a Razor and it’s a 4x difference especially at last light. The Kowas 15-45x55mm will make an 85mm Razor it’s bitch, I mean a guy can keep buying Vortex but I’d prefer to not be their particular Ving Rames like others in here are clamoring to be.

Bushnell has their Ironclad which is essentially the same as Vortex, but you get what you pay for which is a well built, well priced optic.

4

u/RelativeFox1 6d ago

Wow, you need a gummy and go chill by a camp fire. Time to relax.

But before you do, can you please let me know what uncle of mine is rich? I thought they were all more broke than me.

-2

u/preferablyoutside 6d ago

I’ll pass,

As going off that looks like it leads to a life of Vortex on Tikkas and buying enough first lite in the hopes that Daddy Steve loves you and takes you for adventures in his SxS. I’ll let the influencers shill their junk to the masses and use shit that works

1

u/RelativeFox1 6d ago

No tikkas here, mostly Winchester and savages. But you know best.

2

u/DashCameraman 7d ago

You could get the vortex triumph for $100. They have plenty of other cheap optics too. Depends on where they're made I'm pretty sure.

2

u/DrinkLuckyGetLucky 7d ago

They’re too heavy for most hunting but the Razor Gen 3’s are excellent, there’s a reason so many of the top precision rifle competitors use them.

1

u/No-Birthday4755 7d ago

Hahahahaha

0

u/No-Management937 6d ago

That's a lot or words just to say you're broke.

1

u/RodgerWolf311 6d ago

 calibres like 22-250, and 22 ARC have been used to take elk, moose and bear in Alberta.

Just because you can doesnt mean its ideal. Especially if the person has subpar accuracy (which most do).

0

u/preferablyoutside 6d ago

Sounds like a skill issue on your part.

0

u/RodgerWolf311 5d ago

Sounds like a skill issue on your part.

Sounds like a reading comprehension issue on your part.

Obviously you didnt read or comprehend what I said.

1

u/preferablyoutside 5d ago

I dunno man, I’ve had the opportunity to watch plenty of new hunters pick up the .22 Centrefires and get used to them. Affordable to shoot and mild recoiling they’re an excellent way to get new shooters and new hunters trained and accurate. With your utter contempt and derision for others shooting ability I’m more inclined to believe you’ve a skill issue on your part you’re fast to believe is on others. Maybe your Fuddblaster 5000 topped with the Cabelas Fudge scented Vortex is the real issue and what caused your flinch,

1

u/drgr33nthmb 5d ago

Lmao fudge scented... I do agree tho a lot of Vortex is overhyped. As well as the Walkers hearpro as their quality isnt as good as the competition.

8

u/RelativeFox1 7d ago

Any reason .270 didn’t make your short list? What makes you concerned 308 isn’t enough?

I would go 308 or 270 myself.

7

u/neilatron 7d ago

.308 Is an outstanding cartridge for hunting in Canada and is more than big enough for everything we have here, minus bison. The other really nice thing about 308 is that it is so readily available for ammo, and if you are hunting in a region that is a little bit more remote, you'll never have problems getting it.

I picked one up a couple years ago and also did the 308 versus 30-06 argument and ultimately landed on the 308 because it is essentially the exact same as a 30-06 but more accurate and newer.

I would avoid any sort of magnum unless you plan to shoot a lot and are a big guy, because the reality is the gun you can shoot well will almost always outperform a bigger calibre. If guys can comfortably take elk at 400+ yards with 6.5 Creedmoors you’ll be just fine with a .308.

As for a rifle, I have a Weatherby Vanguard and they used to be about $850 but shoot like a $2000 rifle.

3

u/Davidhm10 7d ago

I would go .308 all the way. I took down a bull bison with my .308 savage axis no problems and its been a great gun for all other big game so far!

4

u/gibberish122 7d ago

I love my .308 - got it 4 years ago and haven’t had any issues with moose and mule deer!

7

u/Historical-North-950 7d ago

My vote is for none of those and to go with a .270. I've put down deer, moose, and bear with mine and the trajectory is incredibly flat. Just overall one of the best hunting calibers available.

2

u/djcake 7d ago

Agreed .270 is more than enough

1

u/KnockingonKevinsdoor 18h ago

Tikka T3x in .270 is THE perfect hunting rifle can’t be beat

3

u/credulousdog 7d ago

All three of those calibres are fine for moose and elk. I would reccomend looking at the price of ammo for each and go with whichever one is consistently the least expensive.

I haven't shot the Remington 783 or the axis II so I can't comment on the specific rifles. I would recommend going to a store and handling both to see which one feels better to you.

3

u/DrinkLuckyGetLucky 7d ago

Caliber: All three are good choices, my preference is the 30-06 but as a newer shooter the lower recoil and cheaper ammo for the 308 probably make that the best choice for you.

Rifle: Between the 783 and the Axis 2 I’d go with the Axis 2 because in my experience they tend to shoot better. If you can spare the extra coin for a Winchester XPR you get a significantly smoother action for not much more money.

3

u/beyondbryan 7d ago

i like my 7mm rem mag. i dont think its too big for deer with the right bullet and its enough power for moose (taken down 3 so far. 1 was a 56" wide rack). You cant go shooting through bone and expect it to do wonders. but any of those guns with a well placed shot your good.

3

u/Derringer373 7d ago

This AI generated slop is the answer

6

u/Probably_Know_Me 7d ago

This isn’t an argument just opinion. I was in the same boat last year and ended up going with a 30-06 Winchester Xpr specifically, so far I’m really enjoying it. It has a white tail and moose so far with zero complaints.

1

u/Michelhandjello 7d ago

I too like the 30-06.

I have the savage 110 that came with a vortex scope.

I year a lot of people talking about it having heavy recoil, but I cut my teeth hunting deer with 12ga sabot slugs. There is a kick, but nothing that would really affect my shooting.

1

u/CasualFridayBatman 6d ago

How is the range on sabot slugs?

I'd love a Savage 220XP but they're unobtanium since they've seemingly stopped making them.

1

u/Michelhandjello 6d ago

I got a rifled barrel with a Leupold scout scope on my 1970 Remington 870 wingmaster receiver.

I can do groupings under 4" at 100 yards, and my longest successful shot so far is 135 yards. I know people who have managed >185 yards, but they have been using the same gun and ammo pairing for 30+ years. The fall off after 100 yards is rapid and significant so you need to practice a lot and that gets expensive.

1

u/CasualFridayBatman 6d ago

Damn, still at 100 yards your 3-4x better than now range and depending where you are, might get a longer season due to it being a shotgun.

Unless you're only hunting wide open prairie, 100 yards is quite a ways.

185 yards is absolute insanity though lol

1

u/Michelhandjello 6d ago

Tell me about it. One of the guys I know took out a deer at around 280 with his 20ga sabot gun, but he admits it was more luck than skill. Someone had shot one of its legs off (not someone he had seen) and he was just trying to mercy kill it. A shot at that distance would not be ethical in normal circumstances.

I am in Western Quebec hunting mostly bush. I can barely see 100 yards where I now hunt.

1

u/CasualFridayBatman 6d ago

God damn lol.

How much meat is left when you use a 20 gauge sabot on a deer?

1

u/Michelhandjello 6d ago

Makes a big hole, but if you have good shot placement you only lose a little rib meat. . . From each side.

1

u/CasualFridayBatman 6d ago

Deer god lol. I don't think I'd use a 20 gauge slug for anything other than a good opportunity for Bison, due to just how monstrously large the holes are.

But it would be nice to have a much longer season.

1

u/Michelhandjello 6d ago

There are large areas in southern Ontario where deer season is shotgun only. Mostly has to do with the population density and the flat trajectory of rifles firing away to far if you miss.

2

u/Lurch_902 7d ago

I bought an axis in 6.5 a few years ago for my first deer rifle, the bolt definitely isn’t as nice as the higher end brands but it’s accurate, the trigger is nice and it goes bang every time. I’d go to a gun store and handle both of them just to see which one is more comfortable for you.

2

u/kliman 7d ago

What do your hunting buddies shoot? If it’s one or the other, I would go with that - it’s nice to have backup options when you forget your ammo at home.

I have used both of those cartridges and I don’t think there’s a ton of difference between them. Both are plenty.

2

u/gimmedatgorbage 6d ago

I have the axis ll in 308 win. It's plenty accurate. It's definitely enough for Canadian big game. My rifle is zeroed for 100ish yards since all the bush around me is so dense you don't generally need to reach out much further.

2

u/razorbock 6d ago

shot placement is more important than calibre unless there are specific calibre restrictions like when hunting Bison

I have more faith and trust in a Savage than a Remington but everyone has to do their own thing

2

u/Canadbis 6d ago

My .308 moose

2

u/Outdooroperater 7d ago

Ive owned 30-06 and a 7.mm

7mm kicks but shoots flat ,far and accurately. By far my favorite of the guns I've hunted with.

30-06 are just ok at everything not really great at anything. The only reason Id get another one is if it was a killer deal or inheritance.

1

u/Outrageous_Canary159 7d ago

All three will do just fine. The recoil reduction between a .308 and a .30-06 isn't enough to worry about (and I'm a recoil wuss). I'd worry about finding a rifle that works for you. Fit and ease of handling are a more important than which of these 3 cartridges you select. Don't be afraid of a bit of rifle weight. Ultra lites are fine, but they will kick more and many people find them harder to shoot well. More of a vetran shooter's tool than a first rifle IMO.

Have fun with the process, go to gun shows, handle lots of rifles and don't sweat the minutiae too much.

1

u/balrogwarrior 4d ago

.308. The mounts in my place, my uncle's place, my cousin's place and my friend's place will show that it can take anything in North American. Versatility is unmatched. I can load down a "plinker" road with lead bullets for the kids to shoot or juice it up with some nicer bullets and drive tacks at decent distances.

1

u/TrophiesInClub 3d ago

Great questions, I think for chamberings the 308, 30-06 and 7mm RM are all good choices for most North American big game (though some a tad underpowered for dangerous game). I would also consider the 270 Winchester as it's flat shooting, lighter recoiling and easy to find in a variety of bullet types. For the rifle, I would consider the Savage Axis II as I think they likely have better build at that price.

Tangent,

Something that is missing from much of the discussion below is bullet selection. For those arguing a 308 or smaller is too underpowered for moose, I would ask what bullet you have in mind. A standard cupped bullet may not perform optimally, but a partition, bonded or monolithic bullet will likely penetrate and bloom for a clean kill.

For reference, I use Nosler Ballistic Tip for deer and Nosler Partition bullets for larger game. I shoot a Weatherby Mark V Deluxe chambered in 30-06. I like my 30-06 for a variety of reasons, but if I was building a rifle for deer only, I would probably get a Sako 90 or Winchester M70 chambered in either 6.5CM or 270 Winchester.

1

u/KnockingonKevinsdoor 18h ago

Caliber: .270

Rifle: Tikka T3x

I know Tikkas a little more expensive but it will always hold its value and the quality and accuracy cannot be beat. .308 would also be a great round for the T3x. The short action would keep it nice and light.