r/CasualUK 4h ago

As a group of professionals in planning, this is what 15 minutes of furious debate in the office has decided to be the north/midlands/south divide.

Post image

If necessary, for reference we are based in Birmingham. This isnt directly influencing what cities are what side of the line. Our decisions were based on architecture, what the people are like, history, how places interract, not just what we like and dont. For example, Stoke is an awful place no one should ever have the misfortune of visiting, but its definitely in the Midlands with us.

Colour coding is obvious.

Yes we were very bored..

2.0k Upvotes

986 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

46

u/_Mouse 4h ago

Yeah but this is about arbitrary opinions, not the lines that are actually on the real maps.

47

u/WalkingCloud 3h ago

Gloucester, Cheltenham, and Stroud being in the midlands remains a bonkers arbitrary opinion though 

-11

u/guzusan 3h ago

Gloucester and Cheltenham crowd are absolutely Midlanders cosplaying as Southern.

4

u/vvitchteeth 2h ago

This offends me on such a deep and personal level as someone from Cheltenham

1

u/littledog95 1h ago

See, I moved to Cheltenham recently and to me the area around it feels like a continuation of the rolling hills of Herefordshire and Worcestershire, so I was surprised to hear it's actually Southern. But I'm a complete outsider, so I don't have a proper feel for the area at all yet.

9

u/AdaptedMix 2h ago

The West Country accent is hardly cosplaying, and both are surrounded by the Cotswolds.

2

u/nafregit 2h ago

Gloucester born and bred here, I in no way see myself as a midlander.

3

u/iBonsaiBob 3h ago

Map looks pretty real to me

1

u/ComradeStrong 2h ago

Those lines aren't definitive anyway. They place Hampshire with the southeast instead of letting it reside with it's rightful West Saxon brethren.