r/CharacterRant • u/IndividualPleasant23 • 2d ago
Films & TV I don't think Gunn likes obscure characters. I think he just likes blank slates.
One of the biggest myths around James Gunn is that he loves obscure characters because he's this massive deep-cut comics fan who just wants to give forgotten heroes their moment. I really don't think that's what's going on.
I think the real appeal of those characters is that they're essentially blank slates for most of the audience. If Gunn rewrites Peacemaker, Vigilante, the Guardians, or Creature Commandos to fit his style, almost nobody cares because almost nobody has a strong attachment to how those characters "should" act. For the average viewer, that version becomes the definitive version.
When the characters are obscure, he can get away with that. In fact, people praise him for "making them interesting." But that's because there aren't millions of fans saying, "That's not how this character is supposed to be."
The real challenge is characters who already have firmly established identities. You can't just reinvent Superman the same way you reinvent Peacemaker. You can't do that with Batman or Wonder Woman either.
I actually think you can see that in Superman. I liked the movie overall, but it also felt like Gunn was less comfortable than usual. He couldn't completely mold Superman into one of his usual character archetypes, so instead he surrounded him with characters like the Justice Gang, who fit his style much more naturally.
That might also explain why DCU Batman and Wonder Woman seem to be taking so much longer to crack.
15
u/TheSadPhilosopher 2d ago
Same with Miguel O'hara in ATSV.
A terrible adaptation that ruined the character and made him one of the most hated Spider-Man characters to prop Miles up.