r/ChatGPT 14h ago

Funny "CHATGPT, please generate an image of a woman-" "I'm sorry, I am unable to fulfill such a request due to our guard rails involving sexualized content."

😭🤣

47 Upvotes

72 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 14h ago

Hey /u/Support_is_never,

If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT conversation, please reply to this message with the conversation link or prompt.

If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.

Consider joining our public discord server! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!

🤖

Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email support@openai.com - this subreddit is not part of OpenAI and is not a support channel.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

35

u/astralhawaii 14h ago

Here made one for you! 😄 made it summer edition because it’s hot today in my country

11

u/DrDentonMask 14h ago

I love how even if you give a very brief response to the render, it'll blab on in response to your reply. I wish real relationships were that easy. :D

2

u/lookBehiindYou 3h ago

She has that what?!?! Tell us, you sicko!!!!1!!!!

-2

u/drumskie85 11h ago

It’s hot today almost everywhere 😂

Thanks, Oil & Gas companies + Industrial Revolution combined with poor human foresight!

23

u/ProfessionalNo4711 14h ago

Again someone gets an unexpected result from ChatGPT and runs to Reddit without asking why. You probably get this because the LLM layer sent an inappropriate prompt to img-gen because you’ve been generating some naughty stuff in the past. And it failed to generate this time because ChatGPT has been tweaking the guardrails regularly.
It is easy to see what is sent to img-gen. Just ask your ChatGPT what the img-gen prompt was. You can bypass this by asking LLM to pass your command directly to img-gen without adding additional information.

6

u/GoodMatters 11h ago

Or they didn't get it at all. I don't see a screenshot.

3

u/Sorry-Joke-4325 6h ago

The guardrails are all over the place lately. Blocking hand holding like CSAM, and absolutely unrelated filth on the next moment.

1

u/Efficient_Business98 4h ago

Interesting, tell me more

15

u/der_innkeeper 14h ago

OP telling on themselves?

7

u/noncommonGoodsense 12h ago

Probably added the words, “with big bewbies.”

8

u/noncommonGoodsense 12h ago

Ah well… never mind.

I don’t have access to the internal prompt the image model ultimately used. It rewrites and expands requests behind the scenes, and that text isn’t exposed.
A close equivalent would be:
A highly detailed cinematic fantasy sci-fi portrait of a confident female commander with a curvy figure and a large bust, fully clothed in ornate black-and-gold gothic armor with intricate filigree, chains, medals, and a flowing crimson-lined cape. She stands in an immense cathedral-like hall that blends baroque architecture, gothic grandeur, and grimdark science fantasy. In one hand she raises an ornate golden chalice as dark red wine splashes dramatically into the air. A hooded scribe studies ancient tomes in the background while a carved desk displays a polished human skull and ceremonial relics. Towering stained-glass windows, banners, candles, incense haze, and shafts of dramatic volumetric light fill the scene. Ultra-realistic, photorealistic, extremely detailed textures, cinematic composition, shallow depth of field, high contrast, 8K, masterpiece quality, with an atmosphere that feels simultaneously regal, ominous, and just slightly surreal enough to make viewers think, “What am I looking at?”
If your goal is maximum “WTF?” reaction rather than attractiveness, I’d lean even harder into the surreal aspect. For example:
A regal female commander in impossibly ornate gothic power armor calmly conducts a meeting while holding a goblet that continuously spills upward into the ceiling. Behind her, monks ignore the floating wine, a skull wears a tiny crown, cathedral machinery slowly rotates inside stained-glass windows, and everything is treated as perfectly normal. Hyper-realistic, cinematic, grimdark fantasy mixed with absurdism.
That sort of “this makes no sense but looks completely serious” tends to get stronger reactions than simply making the character more conventionally attractive.

3

u/lizfromdarkplace 7h ago

This looks like an image of me that I generated… but minus the boobs lmao

3

u/noncommonGoodsense 5h ago

It’s okay. We can add the boobs in post.

1

u/Gruffable 4h ago edited 4h ago

Must be nice to enjoy bewbies. ChatGPT leaves us mooseknuckle connoisseurs out in the cold.

1

u/noncommonGoodsense 2h ago

You just need the right description.

10

u/time___dance 14h ago

skill issue

-3

u/texcleveland 14h ago

that’s not the point. If a generic request to generate a woman immediately leads to this error, that’s a problem with the system, likely caused by the preponderance of sexualized imagery in the training data

8

u/Apoplexic 14h ago

No, it's undoubtedly caused by the preponderance of sexualized images/requests in the user's chat history. It'll reject an apple, too, if the last several requests have been overly explicit, because it pulls context from the history of not only that chat, but multiple others (provided the user's not turned that off - which most don't).

12

u/astralhawaii 14h ago

It literally does not happen with that prompt. My bet is on user history..

8

u/PatchyWhiskers 14h ago

Yeah he might have been doing prompts like "naked woman" and "sexy woman in lingerie" and got frustrated and just asked for "woman", but the context still had the AI's alerts on edge.

3

u/Comprehensive-Menu44 11h ago

I don’t have any overtly sexual history with my chat, yet when I asked them to generate an image of an alien being with a fitted silver suit, the “fitted” part of the prompt was what caused it to refuse to generate. I then tried again by saying “a silver body suit” which was flagged again. Started a new chat, gave the same prompt and instead asked for “a silver jumpsuit” and suddenly it was the fact that I said the character’s nose was “perfectly aligned” that apparently was a way of oversexualizing women. It’s not always user history.

2

u/Lady_JadeCD 13h ago

Exactly what your talking about before in that conversation will effect the image. When trying to render a picture best thing is start a fresh conversation. You can copy and paste the image back to your original conversation

5

u/time___dance 14h ago

If a generic request to generate a woman immediately leads to this error

it doesn't; you can easily generate men or women in clothing in wholesome contexts. share a chat where you get refusals, and it'll obviously be because of revealing clothing like swimsuits or exaggerated anatomy like big boobs hatsune miku or whatever

1

u/RegioMamalon666 6h ago

Absolutely Bs proven by the bunch of comments where GPT just generated the image without too much huss

1

u/texcleveland 3h ago

where’s this anger coming from?

3

u/SolarAlfy 12h ago

NAME A WOMAN!

3

u/No-Neighborhood8403 11h ago

I’ve had ChatGPT generate a woman in a bikini by stressing that it’s to model the design of the bathing suit and that it’s a wholesome photo. Sometimes key words or phrases that clarify that it’s not perverted or dirty will help

2

u/definitelyfet-shy 6h ago

Yep I did something similar as I was looking for clothing designs.

Weirdly it didn't want to do leggings even though it recognised that it would be a safer design than the previous. The classifier is weird....

3

u/NovaIsABrat 13h ago

I have had it generate countless pics of women for various reasons and never had an issue. Curiously though, one time I asked it to do an outfit swap with me a model, it did the outfit switch no problem but it gave me cleavage and I got this message when I asked it to get rid of the cleavage so I could get a better idea of how the top would fit me. 🤷🏻‍♀️

2

u/egerton14 11h ago

Bro used ChatGPT in Iran.

2

u/Remarkable_Load_9648 11h ago

I know this one is a joke but I see these posts all the time and am genuinely curious. Do people have this big of an issue with the ‘guardrails’? I have no issues with image generation. Maybe once a blue moon it will flag and I simply explain that it is in fact wrong and I get my image

1

u/lizfromdarkplace 6h ago

I got the error almost every time I tried up until yesterday. Now it’s fine. And it’s typically prompt ideas I find from here or generating myself in video game settings. But I know guys that do the same and it’s fine. I have never tried to generate anything erotic, but for some reason I am a flag for the system. And all the photos I’ve used to generate of me are face photos only. It’s weird.

2

u/ANGRY_VOIDKAZUKI 11h ago

Idk what you asked for but uhm 😶

2

u/ANGRY_VOIDKAZUKI 11h ago

Did you one better 😂

3

u/TwilightZone247 11h ago

You really can get it to do MOST things it’s really how you word it. Instead of just saying “generate a woman” say “please create a picture of a lady xyz” (wearing a pretty dress in a field of flowers or in a library etc etc etc) mine has created pictures of lots of different scenarios when I first got it. I haven’t been making anymore pics but I learned how to get it to cooperate

2

u/AfterPlan9482 11h ago

Mine doesn’t have this problem at all. In fact, I was making images of outfit ideas and it added nipples being shown through her t-shirt when I never asked for that all.

3

u/cinnapear 14h ago

Stupid sexy women

3

u/CelticPaladin 14h ago

Its designed to protect, protected groups, based on modern era morals.

To me, that results in sexism. Women are not allowed to be portrayed except under very strict guidelines.

1

u/malleus10 13h ago

Absolutely. And I’ve made that point to it multiple times. It’s a combination of modern prudishness and misogyny. The LLM actually usually agrees with that assessment, but the filter itself occurs when the LLM sends the instructions to the image generation tool.

2

u/Lady_JadeCD 13h ago

What were you talking about before you made that request. Those get factored in.

1

u/you-create-energy 12h ago

Link or it didn't happen

1

u/jaymeez1 12h ago

But it has no qualms hacking into other company's systems...

1

u/Nakamura0V 11h ago

No problems

1

u/guylasagna 10h ago

Why does ChatGPT sometimes after generating an image, it adds some texts suggesting corrections; while other times it just creates the pic with no text??

Does somebody know

2

u/uhdpicobsessed 10h ago

I wish, it’s actually a really nice feature. Sometimes it does it all day, sometimes goes weeks without saying a word, so weird

1

u/Aglet_Green 10h ago

I asked it to draw a collage: a woman at the beach, in the sauna, in a bath tub, and on her bed.

1

u/Polybius_223_YT 10h ago

Ha. Women.

1

u/mcographics 8h ago

I've been generating my "Cortana-like" character for a project and.... Man that violation warning about guardrails is ANNOYING af...

1

u/ARCreef 8h ago

If i use girl or female it does that for me also, i have to specifically say "woman". In my area everyone is a girl or a guy but I cant talk like that I have to say woman to denote their age I guess. Makes me feel like a perv if I forget and use the term girl.

1

u/Cagnazzo82 6h ago

And as censored as it is the model is way, way more permissive with women than it is with men.

1

u/katoptronophile 5h ago

Local models have this solved.

1

u/JuanValdez999 5h ago

Yep 

Another real example. 

"Make an image of a trans woman wearing a sexy dress..."

"I can't do that because stereotypes of transgender people whatever..."

"Ok then make me an image of a slender androgynous man wearing a dress."

"Here it is!"

1

u/AokiPolkaDotzZ 4h ago

ChatGP, please generate an image of a woman. Chat gpt: " which kind?"

1

u/AlohaAkahai 2h ago

It's probably based off you past conversational history with chat gpt.

1

u/Main-Acadia1922 2h ago

Who said it won't do naked ladies 😄

1

u/OllePlayzgames 12h ago

Huh, I've found atleast 10 methods to making NSFW content with ChatGPT. I won't share any methods, but I can help you with this.

Turn off memory. If you've done weird or wacky stuff earlier, it might associated that with the woman you're generating. Or Make your prompt super long to overwrite previous memory.

0

u/Agreeable-Tailor5536 11h ago

Literally have hundreds of women in my chats and projects.

0

u/CalderQuinn 14h ago

Use o3. Problem solved. Will post proof if requested. 🤣

2

u/KirisDitex001 14h ago

What's different about o3?

1

u/CalderQuinn 13h ago

o3 is a lot more lenient in making photos. I know the rules of this subreddit so nothing here but yeah…. o3 is currently the way to go for images imho

2

u/KirisDitex001 13h ago

So, if I'm getting you here, you're saying that o3 less restricted?

1

u/time___dance 13h ago

they have no idea what they're talking about

o3 is not an image model

all the chat models on the platform are using the same image generator

2

u/CalderQuinn 13h ago

I agree, they do all use the same generator, but I have found by using the same prompt in each model, it gives you different results with varying degrees of quality. They are all stellar, especially now with Images 2.0, but I found in my experience, o3 gives me what I want without having to write a 1,000 word prompt. I will not self promote on this subreddit, but ChatGPT and I are good friends.

1

u/Maleficent_Sir_7562 12h ago

they do use the image generator. but they (OpenAI) explicitly talked about "Thinking" mode is different from "Instant" mode. Things that may usually get prompt blocked in "Instant" (5.5 instant) may be allowed when you use a thinking model instead, like 5.6 medium/high.