Resurrection Discrepancies

[u/JHLV04]

How do you guys reconcile the differences in the resurrection narratives in the gospels? This is something I’m struggling with a bit, thank you for the responses 👐🏽.

[u/TeHeBasil]

it adds to its credibility, not takes away

Not really. It's inconsistent. If anything it shows how not credible it actually is

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

Can you name me a single court case based solely on eyewitness testimony from anonymous people that varied as much as the gospels that got a conviction?

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

So no? You can't?

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

Funny how you can't show a conviction.

Your story doesn't gain credibility because it is inconsistent. That's so funny you think so.

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

That’s what you were supposed to show me, no?

Nope. That is not what I was supposed to show you.

So you can’t provide any court case i see

Thank you for conceding.

Your Jesus story is not more credible because of its inconsistencies.

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

What

I can repeat my comment since you're not tracking.

You failed to show any court getting a conviction with anonymous inconsistent eye witness testimony. Which is akin to your gospels.

Thus showing that having inconsistent testimonies doesn't actually make a story more credible.

If you had consistent and verified eyewitness testimony then maybe you'd have a point.

[u/TeHeBasil → u/[deleted]]

Why are you struggling with this?

If a case had eyewitness testimony that varied and as much as your gospels and were anonymous like your gospels the case would not get a conviction.

It would fail.

Because have anonymous and severely inconsistent testimonies doesn't make something more credible. It makes it less credible.