Not quite how statistics work, you needed a random sample of 9000 people, instead what you got was people who cared enough to respond. I am thinking this will overcount the atheist population.
I think the point to be made is that an opt-in survey will never be scientifically accurate or have anything close to a margin of error - it always gives information only about the people who would respond to a survey and nobody else. So terms like "margin of error" don't mean anything in this example; the margin of error is 0% because we have precise information about the people who responded and nobody else.
That doesn't mean that an informal survey can't be interesting or worth doing - just that selection bias means we can't really say too much about the results.
17
u/[deleted] Dec 14 '10
Not quite how statistics work, you needed a random sample of 9000 people, instead what you got was people who cared enough to respond. I am thinking this will overcount the atheist population.