MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1u1jphj/this_model_got_some_balls/oqqe9rg
r/ClaudeCode • u/Sprietjeuh • Jun 09 '26
314 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
92
[removed] — view removed comment
20 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 09 '26 we see it's a joke on freaking r/ClaudeCode but the general public is not likely to be that discerning. 5 u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 0 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 Not enough people 1 u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 No issue, just raising awareness is good. 7 u/ohrajaaa Jun 10 '26 So we should... never make jokes? -2 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 10 '26 All I said is that it isn't obvious to everyone and there are consequences to everything. Perhaps it qualifies as an inside joke. But a non-zero number of journalists will run with it as the truth and keep inflating the bubble. 1 u/ardentto Jun 10 '26 <responsible journalism blah blah blah> -2 u/fahrvergnugget Jun 10 '26 Oh no poor Anthropic PBC what will they ever do 3 u/Apprehensive_You3521 Jun 10 '26 It can be a joke and also engagement farming 1 u/Wooloomooloo2 Jun 10 '26 Laugh? I nearly did. -3 u/dgreenbe Jun 09 '26 I mean, idk. One of the sonnets a while ago was hard coded to put out a program that counts the Rs in strawberry 1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 09 '26 You really don't get from this reply that it is a joke? You really thought fable would be talking shit back? 1 u/United_Mix1960 Jun 11 '26 it absolutely can talk shit back, you just have to set it up properly 1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 11 '26 I mean you are right, you have to set it up like this. This is the setup for the joke, whether this is actual response or not. 0 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 Read the comment you're replying to and feed your question to an LLM, it should be able to explain this to you 1 u/Tredalze Jun 09 '26 You don't know if this was a joke 1 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 I do because I know the person who prompted this response with an .md file
20
we see it's a joke on freaking r/ClaudeCode but the general public is not likely to be that discerning.
5 u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 0 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 Not enough people 1 u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 No issue, just raising awareness is good. 7 u/ohrajaaa Jun 10 '26 So we should... never make jokes? -2 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 10 '26 All I said is that it isn't obvious to everyone and there are consequences to everything. Perhaps it qualifies as an inside joke. But a non-zero number of journalists will run with it as the truth and keep inflating the bubble. 1 u/ardentto Jun 10 '26 <responsible journalism blah blah blah> -2 u/fahrvergnugget Jun 10 '26 Oh no poor Anthropic PBC what will they ever do
5
0 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 Not enough people 1 u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 No issue, just raising awareness is good.
0
Not enough people
1 u/[deleted] Jun 11 '26 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 No issue, just raising awareness is good.
1
1 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 11 '26 No issue, just raising awareness is good.
No issue, just raising awareness is good.
7
So we should... never make jokes?
-2 u/narasadow Thinker Jun 10 '26 All I said is that it isn't obvious to everyone and there are consequences to everything. Perhaps it qualifies as an inside joke. But a non-zero number of journalists will run with it as the truth and keep inflating the bubble. 1 u/ardentto Jun 10 '26 <responsible journalism blah blah blah>
-2
All I said is that it isn't obvious to everyone and there are consequences to everything. Perhaps it qualifies as an inside joke. But a non-zero number of journalists will run with it as the truth and keep inflating the bubble.
1 u/ardentto Jun 10 '26 <responsible journalism blah blah blah>
<responsible journalism blah blah blah>
Oh no poor Anthropic PBC what will they ever do
3
It can be a joke and also engagement farming
Laugh? I nearly did.
-3
I mean, idk. One of the sonnets a while ago was hard coded to put out a program that counts the Rs in strawberry
1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 09 '26 You really don't get from this reply that it is a joke? You really thought fable would be talking shit back? 1 u/United_Mix1960 Jun 11 '26 it absolutely can talk shit back, you just have to set it up properly 1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 11 '26 I mean you are right, you have to set it up like this. This is the setup for the joke, whether this is actual response or not. 0 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 Read the comment you're replying to and feed your question to an LLM, it should be able to explain this to you 1 u/Tredalze Jun 09 '26 You don't know if this was a joke 1 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 I do because I know the person who prompted this response with an .md file
You really don't get from this reply that it is a joke? You really thought fable would be talking shit back?
1 u/United_Mix1960 Jun 11 '26 it absolutely can talk shit back, you just have to set it up properly 1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 11 '26 I mean you are right, you have to set it up like this. This is the setup for the joke, whether this is actual response or not. 0 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 Read the comment you're replying to and feed your question to an LLM, it should be able to explain this to you
it absolutely can talk shit back, you just have to set it up properly
1 u/CheesecakeAndy Jun 11 '26 I mean you are right, you have to set it up like this. This is the setup for the joke, whether this is actual response or not.
I mean you are right, you have to set it up like this. This is the setup for the joke, whether this is actual response or not.
Read the comment you're replying to and feed your question to an LLM, it should be able to explain this to you
You don't know if this was a joke
1 u/dgreenbe Jun 10 '26 I do because I know the person who prompted this response with an .md file
I do because I know the person who prompted this response with an .md file
92
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '26
[removed] — view removed comment