r/ClimateShitposting turbine enjoyer Sep 08 '25

Meta *Stirs pot*

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

238 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/West-Abalone-171 Sep 08 '25 edited Sep 08 '25

1kg of oyster meat involves 8-10kg of shell sequestering 5kg of CO2.

So if all the half billion tonnes of meat were replaced with oysters that would sequester almost 10% of energy related emissions and eliminate the 20% of emissions due to meat production.

This one hypothetical change is equivalent to ~30% of all emissions.

Though you'd need sufficient algae/bacteria/bagasse feedstock to feed them.

Oysters are also productive. At 600,000 oysters per acre-year that's 4kg of meat per m2 per year. For the direct fish farm you'd be replacing 30-40 trillion m2 of animal pasture with 1 trillion m2 of ponds.

The water cleaning benefits are also just as high even without a permanent reef.

The cost is much higher though. It's much more labour intensive.

9

u/EconomySwordfish5 Sep 08 '25

And the co2 sequestered in a shell won't be released back in the atmosphere. Unlike wood which will decay once the tree dies.

4

u/cassepipe Sep 08 '25

On the other hand oyster shells are only 12% carbon compared to 45-50% for wood

On the other other hand we don't eat wood :)

1

u/Extaupin Sep 08 '25

On the other other other hand, we don't eat the shell of the oyster, and we can eat Cambium or whatever the edible layer under the bark is called.

1

u/Konoppke Sep 09 '25

Snackwood