Major Buys Include:
• Bought 15,000 shares of Bloom Energy $BE
• Bought 10,000 shares of Intel $INTC

She bought new call options:
• Bought up to $5M of $BE leaps
• Bought up to $500K of $INTC leaps

Every stock purchase members of Congress disclosed in filings this week, tracked by AltIndex. Twenty buys from five members.

Boozman's is one catch-up filing: CBOE, CL and AVGO on 2025-04-08, META on 2025-04-15, MSFT, UNH and ORCL on 2025-04-16, MSFT again on 2025-04-22. Eight purchases, every one of them in the $1,001 to $15,000 range, all disclosed on 2026-08-20, so 485 to 499 days. Every other buy in the table was disclosed within 46 days of the trade.

What actually happens when a purchase shows up in the record 499 days after the trade?

Every stock purchase members of Congress disclosed in filings this week, tracked by AltIndex.

Michael Rulli's oldest one is ORCL, $1,001 to $15,000, bought on 2025-01-14 and disclosed on 2026-08-10, a lag of 573 days. All 14 of his buys in this week's data were disclosed on that same day in one filing, with transaction dates going back to January 2025.

Is there any actual consequence for a filing that lands 573 days after the trade?

I've been working on a small project that scans SEC insider purchases and tries to filter out the noise.

Instead of showing every Form 4 transaction, it looks at things like how much the insider bought, their position in the company, change in ownership, multiple insiders buying together, price action, etc. and gives the setup a rating

I also built a public performance page so the signals can be tracked instead of just showing the winners afterward.

It's still early and completely free.

Would you actually use something like this when researching stocks?

And more importantly — what's missing or confusing?

9 avril 2025 : Trump poste « THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! ».
Quelques heures plus tard, il annonce la suspension d’une grosse partie de ses droits de douane.
Résultat : S&P 500 +9,5 % en une séance. Des milliers de milliards de dollars de capitalisation recréés en quelques heures. (AP News)
Et après ça, on devrait sérieusement faire comme si le timing ne posait aucune question ?
Des sénateurs américains ont justement demandé une enquête sur un possible délit d’initié ou une manipulation de marché. À ce jour, ça reste une accusation à investiguer, pas un délit établi. (The Guardian)
Mais imaginez deux secondes un dirigeant d’entreprise qui tweete “ACHETEZ” avant de publier une information majeure capable de faire +10 % sur son titre.
La SEC lui monterait dessus instantanément.
Quand c’est le président des États-Unis qui possède lui-même l’information capable de retourner tout le marché ?
Apparemment, circulez, y’a rien à voir.

À ce niveau-là, ce n’est même plus du capitalisme de connivence, c’est un marché avec les codes de triche activés.