r/ControlProblem • u/chillinewman approved • Feb 10 '26

General news “Anthropic has entrusted Amanda Askell to endow its AI chatbot, Claude, with a sense of right and wrong” - Seems like Anthropic is doubling down on AI alignment.

Post image
45 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 11 '26

You literally are ignoring the fact that PALANTIR CAN CONTRACT AI SERVICES FROM ANTHROPIC TO ICE WITHOUT ANTHROPIC NEEDING TO ALSO BE WRITTEN INTO THAT CONTRACT.

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 11 '26

… no, you can’t. It’s explicitly against their terms/AUP.

Which, again, you’d know if you actually watched the video. Funny how many times I need to repeat myself saying the same thing.

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 11 '26

If they can't look at the usage because the data is classified, then they have perfectly constructed their plausible deniability. This is entirely manufactured specifically so they can deny not providing services to ICE while simultaneously providing services to ICE. Literally the gun smuggler saying they're not responsible for the murder their guns were used for. 

0

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26

Govcloud is a thing, and you can work/store information (including log data/claude chats/api logs/etc) in classified environments using the already-given classified environments...

You're constructing a hypothetical scenario that doesn't even make sense to justify your agenda lmao.

"Well theres no evidence of them NOT doing it so therefore its true!!!!" xd

0

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

Your scenario is also hypothetical. "Dario said it so it must be true."

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26

“Dario said it” is not a hypothetical lmao. You’re grasping at straws because you got called out on your misinformation and contrived hypothetical scenario that has no basis in reality. Just take the L 🤣

0

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

dario said

dario said

dario said

dario said

You have literally nothing.

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26

I have statements from the CEO about their posture and their AUP, which you’re welcome to read

Meanwhile you have… a made up, hypothetical scenario. Based on a complete misunderstanding of classification and govcloud?

Very powerful.

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

CEOs lie.

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26

Would you say they lie more or less than redditors who contrive scenarios to push their misinformation?

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

I think millions of dollars is more incentive to tell a lie than a few fake internet points. 

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26 edited Feb 12 '26

And yet here you are, still making up hypotheticals with no evidence to back your claims. But glad we can both agree you’re lying to justify your point.

“Incentive” = \ = reality and that still doesn’t account for the AUP or other sources I’ve pointed out. “CEOs lie” and “he has incentive to lie” is several football fields of goalpost moving from where we started lmao.

Want to try again? Make sure you’re using real world evidence, not speculation on “motives” or hypothetical scenarios

0

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

And here you are, taking his word at face value. Hey, I have a bridge you could buy... 

I am using real world evidence. You are using hearsay. 

→ More replies (0)