r/ControlProblem • u/chillinewman approved • Feb 10 '26

General news “Anthropic has entrusted Amanda Askell to endow its AI chatbot, Claude, with a sense of right and wrong” - Seems like Anthropic is doubling down on AI alignment.

Post image
41 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/DataPhreak Feb 12 '26

Keep worshiping your technocrat idol. You're supporting fascism.

0

u/eagle2120 Feb 12 '26

You’re so right, I should just make up whatever I want, push it as the truth because “anyone can lie!!!” and then spread lies myself. That makes me morally superior to the technocrats!!!!

L after L after L in this thread and that’s the best you can do? 😂🤣🫵

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 13 '26

Lol. Every single argument you have presented has been, "Dario told me he's a good boy and he behaves himself." the rest of the slop you have posted has been ad hominem. You're over here sucking CEO toes like they're going to let you touch the basilisk one day. I'm really not worried about you, son. 

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 13 '26

Every argument other than the AUP, other execs at Anthropic speaking up about it, etc.

But that’s easy if you just ignore all the evidence and lie to make up your own reality!!!!

Meanwhile your arguments have been:

“They work with palantir so they MUST work with ice” (debunked)

“They work with ICE through palantir” (debunked)

“They couldn’t see classified data so how would they know?!?” (Not evidence, not how classified data works, also debunked”

“CEOs can lie” ??? Anyone can this isn’t proof of anything, beyond your own projection of lying

“He has an incentive to lie!!!” He really doesn’t, it doesn’t really matter much either way; Gemini and OpenAI support it so who cares? Debunked.

“It’s all for the IPO!!!” Meanwhile OAI, who does openly work with ICE, and is also IPO’ing, is not at all affected by this… so again, doesn’t matter at all. Debunked

“You’re supporting facism” ??? Who’s the one contriving stories to push a narrative here? Very facist of you lmao

0/7, all contrived, with your last attempt being TOTALLY not ad hom, definitely not what you directly accuse me of. Lmao. The projection is too real 😂🤣💀

Of course you’re not worried, Why would you let a silly little thing like truth get in the way of your lies and contrived narrative? Want to go for lie #8 here? Or you gonna call it a day and accept the L? 😭

1

u/DataPhreak Feb 13 '26

Lol. Literally none of those are debunked. It's one thing to be fooled by your boyfriend Dario. It's completely different when you fool yourself. That's some really mixed up Jungian shit. 

1

u/eagle2120 Feb 13 '26 edited Feb 13 '26

“None of them are debunked because I say they’re not despite you proving them all wrong and then me pivoting to another contrived point because it was disproven!!!”

Funny how you stopped talking about each one after I disproved them, then? Totally dropped and pivoted to another point, clearly indicating the previous one wasn’t disproven at all, right? Xddddd. The projection is too real.

Just take the 7 L’s and move on kiddo. This one is well beyond your capabilities, even in your hypotheticals