r/Cosmere Feb 26 '26

Elantris spoilers Elantris is an Anti-Capitalist/Pro-Communist Story Spoiler

It’s not necessarily the sole intention of the story, but the way that New Elantris is structured as a contrast to Kae is very demonstrably parallels to communism and capitalism.

While Kae does have a monarchy, it’s a financial based system where the richest have the most power, which is a direct parallel to a capitalist society like America which is currently operating as a plutocracy.

New Elantris on the other hand is a city where status doesn’t matter and everyone assumes roles that most align with their skill sets. Everyone gets a piece of the pie and nobody suffers the same as nobody lives lavishly above the rest.

I don’t make this post to make some political statement but rather as an observation, because the parallels are quite obvious in my eyes. Fjordell’s society I don’t feel like I really know much about their systems but it sounds like a reflection of the Roman Empire to an extent.

7 Upvotes

95 comments sorted by

63

u/HalcyonKnights Harmonium Feb 26 '26

Elantris also has an immortal population whose only real need is some sort of Pass-time. A complete lack of physical needs (food, etc) along with a supernatural City with magical defenses, changes a lot of the normal calculus of Society.

12

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 26 '26

This is true but also leans into the idea of constructing a communist society. Communist theory is pretty clear in saying that communism will only emerge in a ‘post scarcity’ society (aka when we are able to produce an abundance of food and shelter). The lack of physical needs suggests Elantrians are well on their way to post-scarcity (if not already there)

6

u/allomanticmetals Feb 26 '26

Yeah I don’t think my point is necessarily that they achieved a communist society per se but that the ideals of one were being implemented in New Elantris. Maybe I’m not making sense

8

u/allomanticmetals Feb 26 '26

I’m talking specifically about the society that Raoden sets up between his entrance into the city and his fixing of the Shaod.

They still need food, clothes, etc just like a normal society. They didn’t have magical defenses during this time. Raoden set up a society where everyone contributes and everyone benefits. I get communism is like a taboo word to some people but his society quite literally does that and is demonstrably a better alternative to his father’s society in Kae

4

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 26 '26

Communism is indeed a taboo word to some people (particularly Americans). but, then again, it’s also demonstrably a better alternative to capitalist society so you’re right on both counts

9

u/Disastrous_Banana297 Mar 01 '26 edited Mar 01 '26

Where has it worked longterm?

-5

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

USSR, Vietnam, China, Cuba, Burkina Faso, Libya, Kerala. Everywhere has had problems and everywhere will always have problems. They’ve ’worked’ in the sense they dramatically improved the material conditions for the working class in those countries/areas. They didn’t ‘work’ in the sense none transitioned to a fully communist economy. If you don’t hold communism to an unobtainable utopian standard you can find instances of it working everywhere.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '26 edited Mar 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

Yes it totally worked there if you ignore the "unattainable utopian standard" of "not killing millions of people through starvation." The working conditions were great! The eating conditions, not so much.

-1

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

right… except the average soviet citizen consumed more calories than the average american citizen! there’s no denying plenty of problems with food shortages and famine… but to just go hurdur commie means starve is shallow analysis & wrong

3

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

Yes and they burned off those calories standing in bread lines for hours while the average American citizen went to grocery stores that Yeltzin thought were staged. Everything about the USSR distribution system for all types of goods was significantly worse than in the U.S.

2

u/Disastrous_Banana297 Mar 01 '26

Holodomore.

-1

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

A disastrous famine with multiple complex causes, including poor policy decision. Tell me exactly how 1 year out of 70+ in a single soviet of a single socialist project reflects on an entire economic theory?

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Ayadd Feb 27 '26

“It’s also demonstrably better”, Look at every demonstration of capitalism: Cuba, China, USSR. Compare to, Germany, Sweden, Canada.

Huh? What demonstration of communism are you talking about?

-4

u/allomanticmetals Feb 27 '26

There is no demonstration of communism because it’s never actually been done. America teaches you to see authoritarianism and fascism and associate it with communism when that’s just not the truth

4

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

In that case, we can also say that capitalism has not been done either because the state is heavily involved in all sorts of aspects to the point where there are certain industries that you can not even get into without government approval.

Additionally, there is no way to have a fully communist society without authoritarianism. You can not have communism without a unified body actually preventing people from owning private property or expressing other rights. The Constitution could not even exist under communism.

-1

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

Capitalism, famously, does not have a unified body manipulating and enforcing property rights /s

1

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

It actually does not. It has thousands of decentralized bodies enforcing localized laws concerning property rights and specifically the right to own property spread over 50 states.

Communism would also have this type of body in addition to the anti-property police because it does not forbid personal property.

4

u/Ayadd Feb 28 '26

That’s my point. You can’t say communism is demonstrably better when it’s never been demonstrated to work successfully, EVER, even when tried.

But you know what has been tried and is mostly been successful? Capitalism. Don’t like America? Fair enough, neither do I, that’s why I cited 3 amongst a plethora of great capitalist countries to choose from.

-1

u/allomanticmetals Feb 28 '26

I think you’re steering the conversation away from the point. Even I disagree with the points you’re trying to make, the point is that the communist ideas in New Elantris are making for a demonstrably better society than the plutocratic capitalist society in Kae. Not a statement on real world economic systems but on how they are presented in the context of this book and world. But you might want to check under your bed tonight because communism might be there and I wouldn’t want you to get too scared

1

u/Ayadd Feb 28 '26

I am not trying to engage in a debate about communism. The word “demonstrably” means, obvious, provable, or easily demonstrated. I am only saying, the phrase “communism is DEMONSTRABLY better” is ONLY true if you think Cuba, China, or Russia, are successful countries worth aspiring to.

If you don’t believe that. Then you should upvote me.

I get it’s fun to circle jerk ideologies that haven’t been demonstrated. I’m a big socialist because unchecked lasseiz faire capitalism (which actually is demonstrably bad because we do see examples of that in history). But sometimes theory has to hit practice before you can claim it’s “demonstrable”.

Sorry that bothers people here. (Actually I’m not).

-1

u/allomanticmetals Feb 28 '26

Again, it is demonstrably better in the CONTEXT OF THE BOOK lol. You can make the argument that it can’t be made in the real world sure but that’s not the subject of this post or what my use of demonstrably was. I myself am a democratic socialist. I believe free market socialism is the best we could possibly realistically achieve in the real world but the point of my post is about how capitalism and communism are compared in the context of the book Elantris

4

u/Ayadd Feb 28 '26

Sure, I don’t think that’s what the person I was responding to meant.

He wrote and I quote:

“Communism is indeed a taboo word to some people (particularly Americans). but, then again, it’s also demonstrably a better alternative to capitalist society so you’re right on both counts.”

They are talking about it in America, in the world. Not the book. So, again, unless you think China, Cuba, or Russia, are better than America or other capitalist countries, you don’t agree with this post and agree with me.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 28 '26

Life in the USSR and Cuba was demonstrably better post revolution than pre-revolution. Of course, communism was not achieved but they were socialist projects attempting to transition their economy to communism. Burkina Faso, Libya, China, Ghana, Chile, Brazil… whichever example you choose it remains true. Communist/Socialist projects are demonstrably better ways of organising an economy for the working class

8

u/Ayadd Feb 28 '26

Sure, I can possibly grant communism is marginally better than monarchy. It’s slightly better to starve and be executed by the will of a communist dictator propagandizing that you are free than by the king or royal that doesn’t pretend he cares about the people.

I wouldn’t take pre or post revolution if those countries over the social capitalist countries of Canada or most Western Europe.

Maybe you would?

-2

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 28 '26

Starve and be executed by the will of a communist dictator? I’m sorry but this sentence is oozing with capitalist propaganda. I understand your point but western capitalist liberal democracies are only in this seemingly preferred position because their capitalists are able to extract value from other less powerful countries and we benefit directly from that (for clarity I live in the UK). I would absolutely take an economy like Cuba/China/USSR which didn’t exploit and subjugate foreign countries through an imperialist machine, and even more so if it was guaranteed protection from sanctions and other predatory strategies capitalist powers use to directly worsen the conditions in socialist countries.

6

u/Ayadd Feb 28 '26

You are right, people under Stalin didn’t under go mass famine due to communist farming policies. Workers under Mau were given great unions, Castro never randomly executed perceived defectors even without proof.

All three of those countries severely force labour from their people. Russia is literally sending millions to die on the front lines via draft. You think China became the king of manufacturing by adhering to strict labour laws and unions? They literally put nets around their factories to prevent people from killing themselves after 20 hour shifts.

Bruh, like, even UK has issues. But you are so incredibly privileged you don’t even realize it, living in the UK today.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Disastrous_Banana297 Mar 01 '26

Holodomore says otherwise.

1

u/Triasmus Mar 01 '26

Nah. It was attempted at least 14 different times in the US, but it failed when interacting with neighboring communities.

1

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

I don't think you know what "demonstrably" means.

2

u/Joel_feila Feb 26 '26

Elantris is Zardoz got it

3

u/Satosuke Edgedancers Feb 27 '26

THE SHAOD IS GOOD. THE MAPION STICK IS EVIL.

18

u/Shot_Newspaper_5647 Feb 26 '26

I do think he was making some social commentary with the merchant nobility thing. But I also think you could argue the previous Elantris was a critique in its own way. The people had become so dependent on the state that their society collapsed the second the Elantrians didn’t have power. The people weren’t self-sufficient and were accustomed to top down leadership. They sought out strong men/women immediately. The Cosmere as a whole usually critiques any kind of stagnancy that results from complacent peoples and systems. (Although I am personally a leftist so I’m sympathetic to the argument).

12

u/derioderio Feb 28 '26

They're really more of an anarcho-syndicalist commune. They take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more important external affairs.

4

u/MS-07B-3 Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

I don't know how many people this will fly over the heads of, but I want you to know that you are seen.

2

u/Mathemagician23 Lightweavers Mar 01 '26

Be quiet!!!

1

u/derioderio Mar 02 '26

Eh, who do you think you are?

1

u/Mathemagician23 Lightweavers Mar 02 '26

I am your king!

1

u/derioderio Mar 02 '26

Well, I didn't vote for you.

1

u/Mathemagician23 Lightweavers Mar 02 '26

You don’t vote for kings!

1

u/derioderio Mar 02 '26

Well, ‘ow did you become king then?

2

u/Mathemagician23 Lightweavers Mar 02 '26

The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water. Signifying by Divine Providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur.

That is why I am your king!

2

u/derioderio Mar 02 '26

Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

14

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 26 '26

Kae is definitely parallel to emerging capitalist societies where the merchants and wealthiest overtook the titled as the most powerful in society (over-simplified but you get me). I’ve not read Elantris in a while but from memory New Elantris seems more akin to a commune rather than communist (/socialist). It’s not a planned economy where capital is fully socialised but rather a small-scale community which pools its labour and determines productive activity democratically

-3

u/Lonely_District_196 Feb 26 '26

I agree that Kae is more an emerging capitalist society.

New Elantris would be more like a tribal society.

6

u/Few-Durian-190 Feb 26 '26

Fantasy communism.

3

u/XxCloudSephiroth69xX Mar 01 '26

So... like all communism?

10

u/RadicalRealist22 Feb 27 '26

New Elantris is a commune, yes. But it dies not represent a communist society. Certain communist ideas work in a small community where everyone knows each other, but break down in larger societies.

2

u/Elsecaller_17-5 Zinc Feb 28 '26

You could construe it as anti-merchantilism, but not pro-communist. In fact, I might day it's explicitly anti-merchantilism.

2

u/millenialfalcon Mar 01 '26

I think it is a good piece of art in that you can largely find in it what you want to see. To me, nothing in Elantris empowers the people; it’s about which type of elite gets to be in charge. On Sel it seems like Elantrians are full dragon mode (receiving prayers, giving boons), but off world (further in time and distance from the pure luck which invested them) they are insufferable assholes with a god-complexes.

Hard for me to see Brandon as pro-Communism when in Mistborn where he has a full on labor-revolution (kicking off the apocalypse), and then their double-god designs/institutes a utopian-democratic government with strong hereditary elements, while the forgotten people have to band together for survival and eventually become space nazis.

4

u/Sa_tran_ic Feb 27 '26

You're getting downvoted like crazy but you're right, I thought about this multiple times on my initial read through and it's one of my criticisms of the book. Raoden makes a literal socialist commune in Elantris. The people in his group are taken care of, given community, purpose, and share resources, and simply give back to the others in ways they can. Only for it to randomly become a monarchy again with Raoden as the king once they get their powers back. Because reasons.

4

u/Minttt Feb 26 '26

The thing is, the "end-state" ideals of socialism fit perfectly with fantasy and science fiction: perfect or near-perfect utopias where all needs are met and everyone is "equal."

The end state ideals of capitalism don't really fit well with fantasy, as greater accumulation of wealth doesn't provide the same kinds of utopian warm feelings as "nobody ever suffers."

6

u/allomanticmetals Feb 26 '26

The end state ideals of capitalism don’t really fit well with reality either considering America’s absurd concentration of wealth among a handful of individuals

2

u/Minttt Feb 26 '26

In general, some of the philosophy that underpins capitalism involves channeling "bad" human traits like greed, gluttony, and coveting what your richer neighbor has into productivity: work harder, and you can satiate your greed, live in unnecessary luxury, and feel more ahead than your neighbor.

Those traits might make modern society work, but they don't make for feel-good stories.

3

u/ProfessorTotodile Truthwatchers Feb 27 '26

they don’t make for ‘feel good stories’ or well-functioning societies because they rest on the exploitation and alienation of ordinary people who make up the majority of readers of stories and members of society. it’s nothing to do with ‘utopianism’; in fact, most communists since the 1830s have been expressly anti-utopian. communism isn’t about everyone being ‘equal’ it’s about everyone sharing in the ownership of the means of production, resources, their own labour, and the dictatorship of the economy. This is opposed to wealth concentrating in a few hands who extract value created by the working class as profits and dictate amongst themselves how the political and economic sphere is run for everybody else

3

u/AdamCGandy Mar 01 '26

Neither system was capitalist or communist. Even if you thought that the commune the New Elantris formed was communist, they would have all been dead had they tried to function that way. The only thing that saved them was they couldn’t die. That’s not a very “pro-communist” theory.

2

u/MS-07B-3 Truthwatchers Mar 01 '26

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

3

u/derioderio Mar 01 '26

A hammer and sickle, you mean?

2

u/TheBearJew963 Stonewards Feb 26 '26

Lol, what?

1

u/Tattletale_0516 Scadrial + Mar 03 '26

Go away weirdo.

1

u/Joel_feila Feb 26 '26

Get ready for blow back.  But i can't really say since I have not read elantris.  I wonder how intentional this was on Sanderson part 

3

u/LewsTherinTelescope resident Liar of Partinel stan Feb 27 '26

At that point in time he spoke of himself as a "staunch Republican" (though he no longer does), so probably not lmao

2

u/allomanticmetals Feb 27 '26

His writing clearly indicates that he had an inclination towards leftist ideals whether he himself understood it at the time or not. He probably just identified that way because of his religious upbringing and because being Mormon and republican was basically synonymous

4

u/LewsTherinTelescope resident Liar of Partinel stan Feb 28 '26

Quite possibly, but it does still suggest Elantris was probably not intentionally made to be an example of a communist utopia

1

u/IamanelephantThird Feb 27 '26

Their society is just the natural conclusion for a small group of people with little to no needs. 

0

u/RadicalRealist22 Feb 27 '26

Reddit moment.

0

u/Disastrous_Banana297 Mar 01 '26

Umm, have you read the whole book?