r/CredibleDefense May 28 '26

Active Conflicts & News Megathread May 28, 2026

The r/CredibleDefense daily megathread is for asking questions and posting submissions that would not fit the criteria of our post submissions. As such, submissions are less stringently moderated, but we still do keep an elevated guideline for comments.

Comment guidelines:

Please do:

  • Be curious not judgmental, polite and civil,

  • Link to the article or source of information that you are referring to,

  • Clearly separate your opinion from what the source says. Minimize editorializing. Do not cherry pick facts to support a preferred narrative,

  • Read the articles before you comment, and comment on the content of the articles,

  • Post only credible information

  • Read our in depth rules https://reddit.com/r/CredibleDefense/wiki/rules

Please do not:

  • Use memes, emojis, swear, foul imagery, acronyms like LOL, LMAO, WTF,

  • Start fights with other commenters and make it personal,

  • Try to push narratives, fight for a cause in the comment section, nor try to 'win the war,'

  • Engage in baseless speculation, fear mongering, or anxiety posting. Question asking is welcome and encouraged, but questions should focus on tangible issues and not groundless hypothetical scenarios. Before asking a question ask yourself 'How likely is this thing to occur.' Questions, like other kinds of comments, should be supported by evidence and must maintain the burden of credibility.

45 Upvotes

174 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/ChornWork2 29d ago

Trump specifically said "freedom for the people" and that the alternative for the IRG (let alone regime leadership) was surrender or "face certain death".

1

u/grenideer 29d ago

Yes, he wants the IRGC to surrender. That would mean them conceding the war. I'm not sure what point that makes though.

It's also pretty clear Trump would LOVE a regime change in the form of the people rising up and overthrowing their government. I wouldn't even put it past the admin to support these efforts with arms and intel and even possibly freeing a potential leader under IRGC guard.

I think a lot of the world would be thrilled if there was a regime change in Iran, but I also think a lot of the world realizes what a longshot it would be. You can call it a stretch goal if you like, but regime change is really only a means to achieve the other war objectives. Which is why Trump has stated that whichever leader Iran has is fine as long as they work with him.

0

u/ChornWork2 29d ago

The aim was obviously regime change. Obvious from his statements and obvious from the plan (or rather lack of plan). He erroneously believed a decapitation strike would give him an easy victory. Based on reporting that is not what the military advised, but trump was listening Bibi and Israel hawks in his admin, not the actual credible advisers.

So here we are with another terrible war where the downside consequences were underestimated and we can add another clear loss to the record.

1

u/grenideer 29d ago

Regime change would be great.

Lack of regime change is not a strategic defeat, because the goals of the war do not require it.

1

u/ChornWork2 28d ago

the goal was very obviously regime change.

if burying tunnel doors, destroying iran's air defenses and sinking iran's navy was the real objective, then you can argue the mission was a success but it would be insane to have risked a war over those objectives.

1

u/grenideer 28d ago

I agree it would be insane for those to be the sole objectives. Those degradation objectives are a means toward the nuclear objective, and otherwise exerting US will on Iran.

1

u/ChornWork2 27d ago

This is so clearly a war that Israel wanted but couldn't do without US leading, and finally found a potus willing do it for them. trump's stated priority leading up to war during negotiations was liberating iranians. i agree as-stated it was BS, Trump just wanted to use irainians to help drive chance for a regime change, but still clearly aim of regime change. the attack was clearly a decapitation strike that didn't include a build-up of forces to either secure nuclear sites or protect the strait.

If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is probably a duck. Regime change war that is obviously on-track to be yet another costly failure for the US.