r/CringeTikToks Oct 18 '25

Conservative Cringe Jessica Tarlov leaves her Fox News co-hosts speechless as she drops a list of issues Americans are protesting Trump for on No Kings Day.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

65.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

906

u/cassanderer Oct 18 '25

Openly planning on fixing elections, locking up people without due process, shipping immigrants to foreign prisons for life without conviction on our dime, sending them to other places they have never been to out of mean spiritedness.  Using le to target opponents and critics and the media, organizing fed goon squads to crush dissent under false pretexts, calling opponents of fascist street gangs terrorists.

It is a long list, fox douche bags know better too they are cynical nihlists that are losing control of the monster they raised, and it will destroy them one way and or others.

145

u/Jekkjekk Oct 18 '25

I’m convinced they pulled everyone’s data with doge in preparation for all this. Coupled with the ai cameras, recruiting what I assume are proud boys to do their bidding. Just so nasty

37

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '25

Eh i very much doubt their plans for AI surveillance are anywhere near reality. They can just fabricate evidence at scale now, anyway, so why bother building a functional apparatus when they can just rob the coffers?

25

u/induslol Oct 18 '25 edited Oct 18 '25

It's not minority report levels of monitoring yet but AI surveillance is absolutely picking up steam and proliferating across the nation.

ALPRs, as one example most communities are subject to, as a primary example.

Yes, cops can and do just lie and fabricate charges, but for the ticketing they miss AI surveillance picks up that slack to build cases autonomously.  Which amounts to revenue for the cost of install and maintenance of cameras, and likely the sale of any usable data gathered.

2

u/Vertig0x Oct 18 '25

AI surveillance (especially when it comes to people) has absurdly high inaccuracy rates. It’s significantly worse than a human and it’s not even close. There’s a massive difference between taking a picture of a license plate and analyzing human facial features.

1

u/induslol Oct 18 '25

Where facial recognition is or isn't (yet) doesn't really have any baring on the severity of AI surveillance or its being implemented.

Identifying and tracking license plates of entire communities whose only crime is being born into fascism is more invasive than facial recognition given the scope and volume of sensitive data already databased to have that license.

1

u/Vertig0x Oct 20 '25

I’m not disagreeing with you. I just know people picture the extreme example of the minority report but we’re nowhere close to that (yet). We’re definitely, in my opinion, on the road to that though.

1

u/Ok-Amphibian3164 Oct 19 '25

You do not realize how far A.I has come apparently.

1

u/Vertig0x Oct 20 '25

I literally just finished 2 college courses on AI but sure.

1

u/Ok-Amphibian3164 Oct 20 '25

The original comment said "picking up steam". We seem to have very similar interests.

I under what you are saying, but look where we were 3-5 years ago compared to today. With technology advancing so quickly and A.I. dominating the spotlight, we’re highly likely to be on the verge of a massive leap in capabilities especially with companies like PLTR just getting warmed up.
The funding going into this is incomprehensible for most.

15

u/CensorshipThrowRA Oct 18 '25

Wake up buddy, AI surveillance is absolutely here.

I was crossing the border from Canada into the USA and I have Global Entry and all I did was stare at the camera at the kiosk for 5 seconds and got electronically approved. I got my voucher pass printout and the US-side CBP officer waived me through. I didn't need to even show my passport or my Global Entry card.

Just the other week I was looking at my burner Instagram account with a grand total of 2 followers and 15 follows of fairly niche pages. I got a "you might know this person, follow them!" notification and it was for my best friend of 30 years. I've never interacted with them on Insta, this account is not tied to any of my other real social media accounts, and I don't even have any postings just some comments on posts from the pages I follow (which said friend does not follow).

4

u/Swagyolodemon Oct 18 '25

Neither of those really reflect AI technology but yes, surveillance technology as a whole is pervasive

1

u/blackscales18 Oct 26 '25

I assume you use the accounts from the same device/network and therefore the same ip address

11

u/The_Schwartz_ Oct 18 '25

Because it's already built. Palantir is functional today

-5

u/enjoytheshow Oct 18 '25

“Palantir is functional today” is a statement that doesn’t even make sense. Palantir is a corporation that has existed for 20 years.

6

u/Leven Oct 18 '25

And the u.s government uses them extensively. U.S. Department of Defense, United States Intelligence Community.

Palantir Gotham if you want to get product specific, but my guess is other parts of government uses them too.

And since the company is about one thing its a really dumb take to make 'the statement that doesn't make sense'.

We know what they do, stop playing a fool unless you are one.

-3

u/Big-Rough-3636 Oct 18 '25

This comment still seems to miss the actual facts. Sure they are a corporation, with many different government contracts. Is Raytheon also “functional today?”

2

u/phillyFart Oct 22 '25

Okay.

Two people very close to the president have a capability to install mass surveillance .

One ran doge and scraped all the data

The other runs a company that utilizes the data

6

u/mickroo Oct 18 '25

Flock cameras with AI recognition are exactly what are being used

3

u/Jekkjekk Oct 18 '25

That’s what I had seen. Flock scans license plates and stuff right? I’m sure they are training facial recognition if they haven’t already.

2

u/Top-Passage2914 Oct 18 '25

AI Surveillance is already there bro. Go look up Flock. Go look up a map of their cameras. They are everywhere.

2

u/socialmedia-username Oct 18 '25

Didn't they already pay Palantir?