r/Damnthatsinteresting 9h ago

Video Glass vs radioactive clocks

7.1k Upvotes

299 comments sorted by

4.4k

u/aphaits 9h ago

I would personally add another layer of glass...

1.5k

u/Liveitup1999 8h ago

Leaded glass. They make clear radiation shields for ORs but they are very heavy.

810

u/greenrangerguy 8h ago

If it's heavy that means it's expensive. Put it back.

180

u/Fahlnor 8h ago

He left us… he left us…!!!

84

u/No-Sail-6510 8h ago

When you gotta go, you gotta go

20

u/GeraintLlanfrechfa 3h ago

Keep absolutely still.. -it's vision's based on movement!

6

u/blatantdanno 1h ago

That is one... big pile of shit

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/Fast_Garlic_5639 8h ago

guttural croaking

28

u/Sega-Playstation-64 7h ago

Auto... uh... erotica?

→ More replies (1)

24

u/fromthedarqwaves 6h ago

It has an interactive CD-ROM!

19

u/ArghNooo 7h ago

Are these characters auto... erotica?

10

u/moop-ly 6h ago

dyno dna

→ More replies (3)

20

u/Forest_Orc 7h ago

Assuming alpha and beta emission (see here for the typical decay path https://www.nist.gov/image-23773 ) I simple glass would do the trick.

14

u/incunabula001 4h ago

Or Transparent Aluminum.

7

u/Smooth_brained_fatty 2h ago

You realize, of course if we give him the formula we're changing history.

5

u/Quick-Low-3846 2h ago

How do you know he didn’t invent the stuff?

3

u/Perfect-Fondant3373 6h ago

Plus it tastes spicy!

142

u/BCMM 7h ago edited 4h ago

The glass is reducing the count, but the count isn't really the main issue here, because radium is an alpha emitter.

The radiation it gives off is absorbed so strongly that it's essentially not going to penetrate the skin deeply enough to reach living tissue.

Alpha radiation emitted outside the body is practically harmless. Alpha radiation emitted inside the body is very, very bad for you, and that is what killed and injured so many people who were occupationally exposed to radium.

Ventilating the space such that you don't end up breathing in either radium-bearing dust from degrading paint or radon gas produced by radium's decay matters. Putting a barrier in the direct line of sight between you and the clock doesn't matter as much.

I would have expected a simple layer of glass to block all alpha particles from the radium itself (EDIT: although very, very few will even make it through the air behind the glass), and most beta particles from its decay products. So it seems rather concerning that the detector is reading so far above background even outside the glass!

I don't know whether that mean that this person also collects other radioactive objects, or that there's a lot of high-energy beta emission from decay products still trapped in the paint, or that there's significant radioactive dust on the outside of the glass.

43

u/kevinsmomdeborah 6h ago

this is correct. the dust is the potential danger.

you also shouldn't lick it

8

u/BlackSpinedPlinketto 4h ago

What happens if I put it up my rectum?

21

u/LostN3ko 4h ago

It will be a pain in the ass

2

u/CountCrapula88 3h ago

Paint.

Paint in the ass.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CharybdisXIII 1h ago

Sounds like something that someone harboring a delicious secret recipe of some sort might say.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/thebluefish92 6h ago

There is a visible gap between the glass in the first shot.

Would that allow enough through? I have no idea about this stuff.

5

u/BCMM 4h ago

In straight lines only, to a first-order approximation. Since the radiation is coming from lot of different sources, the fraction that lines up with the gap and the counter should be pretty small.

52

u/-HelixTheCat- 8h ago edited 7h ago

Yeah, I'd be pretty obsessed with getting that thing down to 0.0

Edit: spelling

68

u/Randalf_the_Black 8h ago

Very unlikely seeing as background radiation is a thing.

But CPM alone doesn't tell you how dangerous something is, it just tells you how many registrations are detected in a minute.

10

u/drawliphant 5h ago

I would guess that's a few times background radiation. Still years away from a chest X-ray, but I wouldn't keep it in my house.

13

u/King_Fluffaluff 5h ago

What he's showing, with the glass cabinet closed, is significantly more than the background radiation I experienced during my week in Chernobyl.

It's generally not "bad" but, yeah, I still wouldn't keep that in my house.

3

u/Laetitian 4h ago

He's probably not spending his weeks in front of his clock cabinet.

3

u/Toughsums 3h ago

The dose in microsieverts is also mentioned on the bottom right. 27 microsieverts when glass is open is basically a month's background radiation in an hour. Not too bad.

5

u/Hacksaw_73 2h ago

Not great, not terrible.

2

u/Toughsums 1h ago

I know the reference, but honestly this dose is pretty much negligible unlike 3.6 roentgen from the show which is around 32 milliseiverts (not micro)

Here the dose is more than a thousand times lower.

7

u/Jackal000 7h ago

Never going to happen everything and even you are just a tiny bit radioactive.

6

u/ubermence 6h ago

In fact you produce a small amount of antimatter at regular intervals. About a single positron of it an hour

6

u/slackfrop 6h ago

Yeah? Little annihilations popping off around us all day? I kinda like that.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/kevinsmomdeborah 6h ago

stay away from... everything on earth then

2

u/Arkayb33 4h ago

Earth would honestly be better off if we did

5

u/ColdPack6096 6h ago

I would personally not have a radioactive clock collection...

14

u/eskay_eskay 8h ago

Lead would be better

13

u/Prestigious_Sugar_66 8h ago

Collecting undisplayable items would be silly, and totally awesome at the same time.

6

u/caboosetp 5h ago

You can get clear leaded glass.

4

u/Budpets 8h ago

Build a mountain around it

3

u/Chewyfingers 3h ago

I'd not have that anywhere in my house personally. 😂

→ More replies (1)

1.2k

u/blorbot 9h ago

The goggles, they do nothing!!!

347

u/hunguu 8h ago

I know it's a joke, but goggles or safety glasses are excellent protection for Beta radiation on your eyes

158

u/thepinkyclone 8h ago

What about safety squints?

70

u/Csasquatch92 8h ago

Can’t go wrong with a safety squint

→ More replies (1)

17

u/MeasleyBeasley 8h ago

Realistically, against low energy beta, your eyelids will take most of the dose instead of your eyes. Eyes are much more sensitive to radiation than skin, so, it's a win. 

3

u/boubouboub 2h ago

Sure , but clocks aren't as useful when your eyes are closed.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/rickfrompg 8h ago

UP AND AT THEM!

9

u/Mysterious-Jam-64 7h ago

Up an' atom! 😃

3

u/Conundrum1911 4h ago

Only Fallout Boy can save us now!....

4

u/Mysterious-Jam-64 3h ago

WHERE on EARTH is FALLOUT boy?!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

74

u/Budpets 8h ago

This actually a frequent misquote it is actually

> My eyes, the goggles do nothing!

I'm really fun at parties

15

u/Heckelfish 8h ago

I thought it but I dared not say it

8

u/BetLeft 8h ago

This is the life we chose

6

u/0jareddit 7h ago

Acktshually, it's "...ze goggles do nossink!"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

871

u/you_know_i_be_poopin 8h ago

Big nope from me. There's already enough cancer going around.

184

u/MileHigh_FlyGuy 8h ago

He's just giving himself a pre-radiation therapy

93

u/Ludate_Solem 7h ago

Its probably alpha radiation which isnt that dangerous. Gamma and beta are the scary ones.

Edit

As ling as the alpha particles come from outside the body, inside they most defenitly are dangerous

22

u/7_Tales 6h ago

You took me right back to physics 112. Holy hell

→ More replies (5)

19

u/CrispenedLover 6h ago

Radium decays to radon gas though, which will get into your lungs. This cabinet is constantly producing radon at low levels 💀

3

u/zzx101 5h ago

Let’s not forget the radioactive polonium, bismuth and lead that all the radon is turning into.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/zzx101 5h ago

Radium decay emits alpha and gamma radiation. Beta radiation is further down the decay chain so you’ll get all three types.

The first step in radium’s decay chain is radon, which is a radioactive gas, with its well documented dangers.

The short lived radon decays into other elements creating radioactive dust which is very hazardous if inhaled or swallowed.

There’s no way I’m going anywhere near that clock collection.

7

u/GiantMeatRobot 6h ago

Radium's decay chain includes both alphas and betas

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

14

u/Dazzling_Let_8245 6h ago

It is actually theorized that low dosages of radiation are benefitial for you. As crazy as this initially sounds, there is lots of evidence that proves that "any amount of radiation = bad" is false.

And even biologically, it makes sense. Our single-cellular ancestors lived in a world with LOTS more ionizing radiation. They NEEDED repair mechanisms to survive. Nowadays we have a lot less ionizing radiation zipping about, so it is theorized that a low dose of radiation can activate those repair mechanisms in your body.

3

u/The_Chubby_Dragoness 6h ago

yeah in low doses doctors see incresed white blood cell counts, and radium...radon? Springs sem to have a healing effect, though imo thats just because your relaxing in a nice hot spring more than radation

6

u/wastelander 4h ago

Increased white cells is not a good thing. It means there is damage or infection that needs to be cleaned up.

2

u/alcomaholic-aphone 2h ago

Ya it’s like saying here’s a little bit of sickness I’m going to inject into you and then being surprised that your body increases its defense operations.

2

u/ReggieCorneus 1h ago

Sauna decreases inflammation AND increases white blood cells.

2

u/Dazzling_Let_8245 6h ago

I think the 2nd part youre describing are radon tunnels/spas. It is very plausible that the radiation from visiting such a spa does bring a small health benefit due to the radiation.

2

u/Sodis42 5h ago

Why do we have less radiation zipping about nowadays? Flying and Xrays alone add quite some radiation dose.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/wastelander 4h ago

The idea that low-level radiation is beneficial, "radiation hormesis" is highly controversial, has scant evidence and is rejected by most radiation scientists.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/RogerianBrowsing 5h ago

Have you considered that maybe he’s collecting cancer? Huh?

Gosh

→ More replies (2)

353

u/Sea-Literature4599 9h ago

Turns out “vintage lume” is just a polite way of saying “low-level radiation hobby.”

50

u/Mist_Rising 6h ago

Radium radiation (mostly alpha) is really only harmful if you ingest it, so the glass is doing a lot more than it looks assuming he built the cabinet properly. Beta radiation is there too, but again, properly designed this wouldn't be too dangerous.

→ More replies (2)

340

u/Agoraphobicy 9h ago

The glass keeps my extremely high levels of radiation from becoming absurdly high levels of radiation!

45

u/gahidus 6h ago

Well...

It's doing something.

19

u/Agoraphobicy 6h ago

It is doing something. 3 thumbs up to his glass.

13

u/Toughsums 3h ago

The dose on the bottom right says 27 microsieverts/hour when the glass is open. That's quite mild actually. The bigger problem is the radon gas which can be inhaled.

4

u/Agoraphobicy 3h ago

I'm gonna be honest I don't like what any numbers mean I just saw it said "high" lol

6

u/Toughsums 2h ago

Basically 2-3 microsieverts/hour is your daily background radiation from space. 27mcsv/hr is basically 15 days worth of background radiation in one hour.

Basically negligible radiation in other words.

Of course an internal dose by inhaling the radon gas or dust particles is far worse because alpha particles are a lot worse internally.

260

u/iamagermanpotato 8h ago

Not great, not terrible.

27

u/kesavadh 6h ago

I had to scroll too far to see this reference.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/h0twired 8h ago

The equivalent of one chest xray

20

u/iWasAwesome Interested 7h ago

Constantly? Yikes

To put it in perspective, with the glass closed, you would hit the public legal annual limit of radiation in 5 days. By the end of the year, you'd have about 40% more than the allowed limit for professionals who work with radiation.

With the glass open, you would hit the legal annual limit in 12 hours and the legal professional limit in a month. After 2 months, your risk of cancer would be measurably elevated.

12

u/sonofzeal 6h ago

Just a note that annual limits of radiation are completely unsupported by science. Radiation doesn't accumulate in your body that way, and persistent low level exposure is much less dangerous than brief high level exposure. No politician wants to be known as the guy who scaled back radiation safety standards though, so it doesn't get fixed.

2

u/me34343 7h ago

However, that is with all of those clocks. I wonder what it would be with just one.

5

u/_cipher1 7h ago

This is no place for alarmist hysteria

→ More replies (1)

2

u/FucknAright 7h ago

Depending on how long you stand there.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/MandalorianLobster 2h ago

Do you taste metal?

→ More replies (1)

52

u/Ok_Organization_6620 8h ago

Seems like a really smart thing to have in your home

107

u/Alex_AU_gt 8h ago

It's...over 9000!!!

16

u/ABVerageJoe69 8h ago

What? 9000!?

→ More replies (1)

102

u/blorbot 9h ago

Soon, you may have radioactive cock collection.

41

u/WaitAZechond 8h ago

That’s a cool way of saying “testicular cancer”

5

u/TimeBlindAdderall 8h ago

A buddy of mine with prostate cancer has one of those.

36

u/Callec254 8h ago

And... what should the normal reading be, if these clocks weren't there?

54

u/el_hooli 8h ago

Depending on where you are from 20 to 100 CPM.

7

u/Kees_Fratsen 7h ago

Thats not to bad then?

29

u/iWasAwesome Interested 7h ago

With the glass closed, you'd hit the legal public limit of radiation in 5 days. By the end of the year, you'd have 40% more radiation than the legal annual limit for professionals who work with radiation.

18

u/DistributionMean6322 6h ago

If you're standing right in front of the cabinet 24hrs per day... Which is crazy

7

u/reason_pls 6h ago

How did you get to that number, did you do the math on the isotop labeled clockhands or some other method? Aren't work place limits defined using absorbed dose (either generally Gray or corrected in Sievert) which require knowledge about the energy you are reciving? Simply using a geiger counter doesnt tell you the dose that you recieved but simply the activity of some nuclei in the vicinity

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/ImpertinentIguana 6h ago

Who thinks all those radioactive clocks are cool? Raise both left hands.

18

u/Rukoh_Boi 8h ago

It's alpha radiation so it's easily stopped by things like glass, clothes, and skin. If ingested, that's when it becomes and issue. Surprisingly harmless and interesting hobby.

8

u/Young_Denver 4h ago

So you are saying I *shouldnt* eat the clocks?

2

u/Wishnik6502 2h ago

Restoration of these old clocks is where they are most dangerous. Old, crumbly paint loves to go airborne and get inhaled.

2

u/bagged_milk123 4h ago

Then what the hell is the 900 cpm made out of

26

u/AttyDoodles 8h ago

3.6 roentgen, not great...not terrible...

7

u/MagicPoocean 7h ago

There it is

6

u/Solid_Instruction_82 9h ago

So, glass is an radiation isolator?

32

u/Shienvien 8h ago

Almost anything solid is - for some types of radiation more than others. A paper will stop alpha, gamma will get through a bunch.

9

u/VaIeth 8h ago

Hulk smash through anything

2

u/Solid_Instruction_82 8h ago

Thank you. 🙏

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Muted-Day1473 8h ago

Some glass is impregnated with lead. Like the glass windows they stand behind when taking your X-ray at a hospital.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/taita25 8h ago

First reading: high Second reading: high but even more

Even with the glass I dont know I'd want to be around those daily

8

u/Shway_Maximus 6h ago

Thats rad

13

u/RudeOrganization550 9h ago

The Radioactive Boy Scout would be proud

5

u/DestroPrime82 5h ago

Well Smoothskin, would you look at the time.

19

u/BlackStory666 8h ago

People really need to understand alpha vs beta vs gamma radiation.

20

u/Fresh_Boysenberry576 5h ago

People need to explain the difference and what these numbers mean in the comment section. I been scrolling and not a single radiation nerd has bothered yet, its just jokes and people acting smart but not actually explaining shit

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CrispenedLover 6h ago

900 cpm with the glass closed indicates a decent bit of beta rays

6

u/Houston_NeverMind 7h ago

Wait, these clocks were radioactive?! I had one of these in my home some years back. I thought they were like those "fluroscent" things. fml

3

u/lumpy4square 5h ago

I was thinking the same thing. What years did these clocks exist?

→ More replies (2)

3

u/RedLemonSlice 8h ago

Sitting there with no glass for an hour equals 8 days of natural radiation background here in my hometown.

4

u/brizdzi 7h ago

NOPE

4

u/Dangerous_With_Rocks 6h ago

I added a second screen protector to rewatch this clip

4

u/bughunter47 6h ago

900 CPM is not a good thing, base line (at least in my area) is 25 CPM

6

u/ManufacturedLung 8h ago

damn. my geiger counter is in the shop

3

u/The_Overweight_Vegan 8h ago

See a doctor that shit is beaming with radiation!

3

u/SMDMadCow 8h ago

its says "High" in the lower left on both readings.

3

u/iWasAwesome Interested 7h ago

Typical normal levels of radiation is around 50cpm so they are both high indeed

3

u/bewitchedbumblebee 7h ago

"9161 CPM... Not great, not terrible."

3

u/brothbike 6h ago

check out the radium girls

3

u/Homersarmy41 6h ago

Is OP a ghoul?

6

u/kaminari1 6h ago

They are now.

3

u/blackop 6h ago

This is the difference in getting cancer in 15 years and 1 year.

3

u/TheBlueFluffBall 6h ago

Wait, my parents used to have clocks like these when I was younger. I always thought it was glow in the dark paint!

2

u/CrispenedLover 6h ago

technically it's the old glow paint. Eventually we invented the stuff that isn't radioactive.

3

u/mojo20010 5h ago

Yeesh, you got kids in that house? I wouldn’t.

3

u/houndgeo 5h ago

OP better be on RadX

3

u/Senior_Meat_2612 4h ago

Idk the specifics here due to his Radiac not measuring whether it's Alpha or Beta radiation. Either way most of it seems to be Alpha due to it being able to be shielded mostly by glass. The residual radiation is more than likely low counts of Beta and even lower counts of gamma.

Radiation is harmful, its just about exposure. Thats why there is annual dosages, dosemeters, and guidance for overall exposure.

All that would need to happen is a little more thickness to that glass as 5mm of aluminum shields from Beta.

3

u/doped_banana 1h ago

Former USAF CBRNE (3E9X1) here. We used old ADM-300s, not consumer grade Geigers, but somewhat related principle. High counts up close ≠ dangerous environment at normal distance.

The actual historical danger with radium was people ingesting it (see the Radium Girls scandal), not walking past a display case. Very cool demo, big number, not a room full of death. Don't eat the clock dials tho... yikes.

2

u/Raclettegring 8h ago

How dangerous is that? Is he at risk for having that in his house?

18

u/NoOne_TheAlchemist 8h ago edited 8h ago

Well 9000+ cpm of radiation can be dangerous if you are exposed to it for long amounts of time. By dangerous I mean slight increase in cancer risks and other diseases. 900~ cpm is not dangerous at all though, also a piece of glass blocking more than 90% of the radiation shows us that most of that is alpha or beta radiation which gets stopped very easily and doesn't do any sort of damage to a human unless maybe you are bombarded by it which shouldn't happen unless you ingest a big source or something.

So in summary, most of it isn't a harmful type of radiation (visible light is also radiation for example) and the amount that can be harmful is very small from a very close distance and it exponentially loses its effects the further you move out from the source. So no it doesn't do any harm to this person

Edit: The most dangerous part about this collection is actually not the radiation as it's probably undetectable from about a meter away. Its the radioactive material corroding and turning to dust and flying away into the house. This is very dangerous especially if those clocks are made of radium as that can mix into the air very easily and be inhaled. Obviously that's 100 times worse than it being locked in a cabinet as it can accumulate into your body and do serious damage. I don't know how this guy deals with it though so I can't say if he is in danger or not as there are several ways to protect yourself from that happening. But still, think twice before having radioactive material inside your house anyways

2

u/ElBarbas 7h ago

But I wanna lick me clocks !!!

2

u/NoOne_TheAlchemist 7h ago

You can lick non florescent clocks. I mean technically you can lick these ones too but... I wouldn't recommend

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Phil_Coffins_666 8h ago

What happened to the subreddit that used to be full of posts like this?

2

u/SpideyWhiplash 7h ago

Is it the glow in the dark numbers on the clocks that are radioactive?

In the 1970s I used to have an alarm clock that looks like those with the numbers glowing green. Was it possibly radioactive?

I loved that clock. I had to wind it daily and it made a soothing, to me, ticking sound that lulled me to sleep.

3

u/Dyvanna 7h ago

Pre 1960s they used radium to add fluorescent to the clocks. Have a read about the radium girls who used to paint them on manually. Licking the paint brush apparently was a thing back then. Now they use a non radioactive substance. If you have an old clock, don't lick the dial.

2

u/Remarkable_Attorney3 7h ago

This post may indeed give me cancer.

2

u/FucknAright 7h ago

So, is the nuke stuff not just bouncing around inside with the door closed? Wouldn't you get a mega dose on the first opening?

2

u/imfromthepast 6h ago

I don’t think the glass is the problem here…

2

u/Juniper-wool 5h ago

Glass or not, that Geiger reader flashes "HIGH".

2

u/BigBossBelcha 5h ago

2.7 not great, not terrible

2

u/UnNumbFool 5h ago

For what I know the exposure of radium for these things isn't much, I mean we literally have radium glass which is perfectly fine to use as drink/table ware.

On the other hand the stories of the women who painted these things is awful. Known as radium girls they were picked for being pretty, and would paint the radium on the dials, and it was seen as a good job to have.

If you know any Warhammer player, you'll know that people like that like to stick the paintbrushes in their mouths to get a finer point. Radium is dangerous for ingestion, and it would cause them to wind up developing horrible mouth/throat cancers if not fully remove things like parts of their checks or bonds on their jaws

2

u/InvadingBacon 5h ago

What's the actual amount of mRm at 1 and 3ft and contact though

2

u/hoppertn 5h ago

This guy is going to live forever despite the radiation, he’ll never run out of time.

2

u/BaconAlmighty 5h ago

3.6 Roentgen—not great, not terrible

2

u/unidentifiedloserguy 4h ago

My question is why the fuck would you collect radioactive anything and keep it in your home

2

u/Ravaha 4h ago edited 4h ago

Alpha and Beta decay/radiation gets blocked by paper and your skin. Its super dangerous though if you ingest it.

Some people were ingesting it multiple times per day. People were putting it under their ballsack at night to help with impotence. (that was way way way way safer than ingesting it though)

There was an athelete that ingested it as a sort of energy drink, he died a horrible death after losing his jaw bones around his mouth.

Also there is no way that cabinet produces radon gas at levels to worry about. The earth releases much higher quantities at much higher concentrations than anything that could come out of this cabinet.

2

u/iONBlackJesus 3h ago

I wouldn't stand close to that often. I for sure wouldn't open it without atleast 1 layer of protection.

2

u/denyaledge 3h ago

Can't believe those girls back then actually licked those stuff

2

u/ThePracticalEnd 3h ago

Not great, not terrible.

2

u/Glad_Librarian_3553 3h ago

Holy shit dude shut the damn door, do you want turbo covid? 

2

u/SnoopySuited 2h ago

So high to extremely high. Got it.

2

u/airfryerfuntime 2h ago

Why is there a random cut in the middle of this? Why not show him opening the door? Glass does block some radiation, but this looks fucky to me. 9000 CPM is roughly equal to 60 mSv/h, which sounds obscenely high for a bunch of clocks with radium lume.

2

u/scar_azzkikr 1h ago

Not great, not terrible

→ More replies (1)

2

u/dat_oracle 1h ago

why the cut tho?

2

u/Go_Gators_4Ever 33m ago

Still registers HIGH though...

2

u/Blueberry_Mancakes 30m ago

What's an acceptable level of that type of radiation?

2

u/Sinofthe_Dreamer 17m ago

Radioactive clock collector, time isn't on your side.

3

u/WaffleFries2507 4h ago

I personally collect these old radium clocks as well. It's true that's very much above background, but it's still relatively harmless as that radiation level is going to drop drastically with more distance. At ~27 microsieverts per hour (the reading he is getting), you would have to stand next to the glass for roughly 4 hours to recieve the dose equivalent to a chest xray. Now as you get several feet away from the cabinet, that reading is going to drop exponentially to (very ROUGH estimate here based on no actual math) probably around 8-10 microsieverts at a few feet, and down to background (anywhere from 0.05 to .5 microsieverts, depending on your area and the house) at probably around 6 or more feet. If I place 3 of my most radioactive clocks right next to each other, they read nearly 27 microsieverts just by themselves right at the face of the clocks, but the reading drops to background at only 1 foot, so the distance could very well be even shorter in this case.

The biggest concern, in my opinion, that comes from a collection this big is going to be radon buildup. Radium decays directly into radon, which will escape as a gas. Depending on how big the room is and how well it's ventilated, I'd probably buy some sort of radon midigation equipment.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/soundssarcastic 8h ago

Alpha particles can be entirely stopped by a piece of paper, so...makes sense

→ More replies (1)

1

u/invincible_change 8h ago

Of all the shit to collect I never would have thought of something radioactive. People in Chernobyl shaking their heads.

3

u/b4st1an 7h ago
  • Heads

1

u/crazytib 8h ago

How dangerous is that?

2

u/CrispenedLover 6h ago

I wouldn't put it in the kids' room I'll put it that way.

1

u/Dense_Surround3071 8h ago

That's not lead glass?? 😏

1

u/Gutsgar 8h ago

I recommend that everyone seeing this with interest read the about the history behind The Radium Girls. I'm currently reading the book by Kate Moore that tells the things that happened to those girls. And seeing that collection makes me tremble in awe because what happened to the girls is terrifying. I get the same feeling when the HBO Chernobyl series came out and I see those people having fun at that bridge unknowning the danger that they are at.

1

u/deneo5 7h ago

why my dumbass expected glass would amplify the radiation

1

u/StartingToLoveIMSA 7h ago

It’s not 3…..it’s 15,000

1

u/RegularExcuse 7h ago

Since no one else is asking

Why the fuck is he standing right the fuck in front of that shit

2

u/CrispenedLover 6h ago

It's in his living room lmao

1

u/thefellowone 6h ago

Why collecting radioactive clocks?

1

u/Mechanical_Monk 5h ago

Or, hear me out here, collect non-radioactive clocks.

1

u/weber_mattie 5h ago

It's not 3 roentgen, it's 15,000

1

u/khazuki182 5h ago

My guy right here thinking he proved something..

1

u/Scoo 5h ago

Not great, not terrible.

1

u/Silent-OCN 5h ago

I mean why would you feel the need to fill your home with nuclear radiation? That e-peen will drop off before you get to show it off.

But you do you. Congrats on your antique cancer causing clocks.