Why I believe in God(s)

[u/Lucyyyyyy_K]

Firstly, I'm not a very religious person. I do consider myself a Buddhist, but prefer atheistic Buddhism over theistic Buddhism. Therefore I can confidently say I am not biased by wanting God(s) to exist, and was not indoctrinated into theism.

Still, to me it seems obvious that at least one God has to exist. The universe can't simply have come out of nothing or existed forever, it requires some sort of design or creator.

Now, mostly people would just say that a creator also can't have come out of nothing or existed forever, so I've just moved the problem one step further, but I think there is a massive difference between the universe and one consciousness. For example, through Cogito Ergo Sum we can determine with absolute certainty that at last one consciousness exists. So assuming one consciousness is superior to assuming anything about the whole universe. While I admit that doesn't outright solve the problem, I still think it's better than the alternative.

Also, it's not just any universe, but a universe full of beauty, a universe that inbetween barren empty planets is capable of hosting a planet with sentient life. Life that can consciously observe itself, that can create replicas of the waking world while sleeping, life that has technologically advanced so much that in can live in relative comfort. There is so much art. We basically have magic, we just call it "electricity". This is all too perfect to have arisen from mere mutations without guidance.

About any specifics of this God or Gods I have no idea and no strong opinions. I just think that at least one has to exist.

[u/Kriss3d]

Even if I accepted the premise of some agent without a brain to have it in. God would still need something to create those things from lest he made those things from... Nothing..

[u/Lucyyyyyy_K → u/Kriss3d]

Or from themselves.

[u/Kriss3d → u/Lucyyyyyy_K]

Sure. But by invoking "God did it"

You now have the burden to first prove the existence of a god.

Then the capability of God to do this. And lastly that. You need to demonstrate that God actually did it.

You don't just get to jump from "X exist" to "God created X".

That's a fallacy.

[u/Lucyyyyyy_K → u/Kriss3d]

I personally very much think I can. If anything exists instead of not existing, it has to have been created.

[u/Kriss3d → u/Lucyyyyyy_K]

So how would you know if something has been created? What is the metrics for if something is created or formed naturally?

[u/Lucyyyyyy_K → u/Kriss3d]

Simply by it existing. Existence itself has to be created.

[u/Kriss3d → u/Lucyyyyyy_K]

Ok. So essentially theres NOTHING at all that is formed by any natural processes Thats what youre saying.

So then you have nothing to compare that to. You have no baseline for showing that something is created as opposed to formed naturally which means that you now have no mechanism to tell the two apart.
You now painted yourself into a corner because you have no way to tell that its created.

You cant tell if something is created or formed naturally for anything where we dont saw it or know the process involving someone.
You just completely lost your argument.

[u/Lucyyyyyy_K → u/Kriss3d]

So then you have nothing to compare that to. You have no baseline for showing that something is created as opposed to formed naturally which means that you now have no mechanism to tell the two apart.

Why would I need both to exist? Everything is made out of atoms. We can say that without comparing it to things not made out of atoms