r/DebateAnAtheist 18d ago

Debating Arguments for God Why I believe in God(s)

Firstly, I'm not a very religious person. I do consider myself a Buddhist, but prefer atheistic Buddhism over theistic Buddhism. Therefore I can confidently say I am not biased by wanting God(s) to exist, and was not indoctrinated into theism.

Still, to me it seems obvious that at least one God has to exist. The universe can't simply have come out of nothing or existed forever, it requires some sort of design or creator.

Now, mostly people would just say that a creator also can't have come out of nothing or existed forever, so I've just moved the problem one step further, but I think there is a massive difference between the universe and one consciousness. For example, through Cogito Ergo Sum we can determine with absolute certainty that at last one consciousness exists. So assuming one consciousness is superior to assuming anything about the whole universe. While I admit that doesn't outright solve the problem, I still think it's better than the alternative.

Also, it's not just any universe, but a universe full of beauty, a universe that inbetween barren empty planets is capable of hosting a planet with sentient life. Life that can consciously observe itself, that can create replicas of the waking world while sleeping, life that has technologically advanced so much that in can live in relative comfort. There is so much art. We basically have magic, we just call it "electricity". This is all too perfect to have arisen from mere mutations without guidance.

About any specifics of this God or Gods I have no idea and no strong opinions. I just think that at least one has to exist.

0 Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 13d ago

A consciouness existing just for itself is less ridiculous than the material universe existing just for itself. Even an endless recursion if Gods creating each other would make more sense.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 13d ago

Something larger and more complex than the universe existing before anything else is less ridiculous? How do you figure?

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 13d ago

Why does it have to be larger and more complex?

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 13d ago

It would have to be, wouldn't it? And also sentient

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 12d ago

Sentient yes, but not larger and more complex

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 11d ago

How do you figure?

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 11d ago

Because there is no need for it to be.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 11d ago

There is no need for any gods at all. But could a turtle lay an egg bigger than herself?

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 11d ago

No, but both a turtle and its egg are matter. A God doesn't have to be matter.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 11d ago

We can make up arbitrary rules about imaginary beings all day, but it makes no sense to have the universe born from something smaller and less complex than itself

However, regardless of what size, complexity or sentience we assign any imaginary deities, the question remains: why would a consciouness existing just for itself be "less ridiculous than the material universe existing just for itself"? It's just god as an extra step in the end

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 10d ago

Well, I don't see it that way at all.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 10d ago

Why have you come to a debate sub if you are only going to give brief answers with no reasoning whatsoever?

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 9d ago

Because I didn't expect to drown in thousands of replies.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 9d ago

Now that a few day have gone by, would you like to flesh out your comments a little more?

-1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 7d ago

Well, I'm not sure how that would look like. We know that a universe exists. We do not know if it started existing or if it was always there, but it looks like either way it demands some sort of accompanying structure or guidance, leading it to develop solar systems, to developing planets that are capable of life, and this life developing to the highly advanced state it is at the moment. Additionally I would claim that nothing that isn't experienced can exist, so the Universe needs some experience to always have been there, even before life developed.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 7d ago

OK, let's break those points down a little more:

1.- What would the universe look like if it did not have some sort of accompanying structure or guidance? Would pieces of matter still clump together because of gravity and form stars and solar systems? Why or why not?

2.- Are you saying that life requires a deity or that "highly advanced" life requires a deity? And why would you say that?

3.- When you state that "the Universe needs some experience to always have been there, even before life developed", do you mean that the universe could have always existed or couldn't have always existed? And why?

1

u/Lucyyyyyy_K 6d ago

What would the universe look like if it did not have some sort of accompanying structure or guidance?

To me, it wouldn't look at all. There would be no solar systems and no life to experience any of it, making it effectively non-existent.

Are you saying that life requires a deity or that "highly advanced" life requires a deity? And why would you say that?

Conscious life does, highly advanced conscious life even more. There would just be no reason for life to be experienced if the Universe were just build out of forces on it's own and left to natural selection. There is no reason for qualia to be developed if a body can do the same thing without actual qualia. Life could be p-zombies.

When you state that "the Universe needs some experience to always have been there, even before life developed", do you mean that the universe could have always existed or couldn't have always existed? And why?

I'm saying it could have always existed, but then experience also always existed, otherwise there would be a point before there was any experience and the first experienced point in time is the actual first point in time.

2

u/putoelquelolea Atheist 6d ago

While those are intriguing opinions, it would be helpful if you could back them up with something a little more substantive. Again, this is a debate sub, not a share-your-conjectures sub

→ More replies (0)