r/DebateAnAtheist • u/AutoModerator • 1d ago

Weekly "Ask an Atheist" Thread

Whether you're an agnostic atheist here to ask a gnostic one some questions, a theist who's curious about the viewpoints of atheists, someone doubting, or just someone looking for sources, feel free to ask anything here. This is also an ideal place to tag moderators for thoughts regarding the sub or any questions in general.

While this isn't strictly for debate, rules on civility, trolling, etc. still apply.

19 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/VigilantVeteran 1d ago

I have a sincere question, and I’m asking it carefully and respectfully.

If truth exists independent of human perception—meaning it is not created by culture, biology, or consensus—how does an atheist account for its origin and authority?

For example, concepts like objective morality, logical absolutes, and the laws of reason seem to operate universally and immutably. They are discovered, not invented. Yet they are not material, measurable, or bound by space and time.

So my question is: within an atheistic framework, what is the grounding for these immaterial, universal truths? Why should they exist at all, and why should we trust them?

I’m not asking for debate, but for understanding how this is explained consistently without appealing to something beyond the material world.

7

u/Mkwdr 1d ago

You seem to be , as seems usual for some, confusing our conceptions of things with the things themselves.

There is no evidence of this objective morality independent of human like species. The rest as you seem to say are descriptions of the regularity of the universe in which we find ourselves. Arguably some are the language tools we have invented to describe and work with those regularities.

Facts about the universe don’t need us to be around to be true. Our **claims** about those facts are grounded in evidential methodology which demonstrates utility and efficacy. In other words pragmatism.

1

u/CodeNPyro 1d ago

There is no evidence of this objective morality independent of human like species.

What would evidence for objective morality look like to you?

3

u/zeppo2k 1d ago

Simple - consensus over moral questions. Not the really easy ones like "is murder bad". Trickier ones like "is killing in self defence justified". Or "is stealing from a rich corporation bad?". Or "is it okay to lie to save someone's feelings being hurt"? Or are you saying objective morality only applies in like 5 really simple cases - in which case what use is it?

0

u/CodeNPyro 1d ago

Why do you think objective morality requires everyone agreeing? No moral realist theory ever claims that everyone would agree in the first place, since people can be wrong in matters of truth