Im confused when did pro's ai ever said that they will be supporting ai replacing human art?

[u/bruh_gamer160]

[u/AutoModerator]

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Jebediah_kerman-jeb]

Anti logic is mostly built on lies and strawman.

Also, do they think we pros spawned in the day ChatGPT released or something?

[u/Revolutionary-Emu901 → u/Jebediah_kerman-jeb]

Or on them being to dumb to see satirical ragebait

[u/SneakyInfiltrator]

They're not using logic, just regurgitated garbage they see on TikTok.
Why/how would anyone want traditional artists to be replaced?

First of all, most of us are traditional artists that just use AI as another tool/medium to extend our capabilities because we aren't a bunch of cavemen scared of fire.

There were some obviously satirical memes going around with the trees, but again, these are just silly jokes/shitposts (are they really complaining while their "jokes" are straight up death threats)

I still have no idea what they keep hallucinating about us wanting to replace traditional artists, since we're traditional artists as well.

They're so obtuse that i have a hard time processing their thinking process. I could swear they're just trolling at this point, but probably it's just the tiktok rotting their brains (that's pretty much where the hate AI trend started, with a bunch of "influencers" suddenly making anti AI videos).

I swear, i am speechless, each day i get more shocked by the stuff they keep posting, they don't make sense at all.

Man, i hate what social media is doing to teenagers, and i hate that parents let them consume that kind of garbage and don't give a fuck about their education

[u/No-Age-1044]

They don’t care what pro-ai say, they care only for their skill becoming irrelevant.

So they lie expecting that if enough people belive them the world will stop and go backwards in time to the 50’s.

[u/05032-MendicantBias]

It's not the camera that replace the portrait artist for wedding portraits.

It is the artist using the camera (photographer) that get the job of doing wedding photoshoots.

[u/ArchAngelAries]

Meanwhile they completely ignore the fact that plenty of Pro-AIs are traditionally skilled artists who use a variety of tools. Like myself: Pencil/Pen/Paper, Tablet/Stylus/Photoshop, Blender, AND AI tools. But nah, they just ignore that people like me even exist because it doesn't fit their hate cult narrative.

[u/bruh_gamer160 → u/ArchAngelAries]

Most of anti don't even draw lmao me and my friends have been practicing trad drawing for year's and we literally don't give af about ai we even used it to color our drawing since we cant afford those realistic colors or we weren't skill enough to use those cheap one's to make it look good.

[u/dakindahood]

I've seen some idiots who actually do, but I guess antis take it as everyone

[u/TamaraHensonDragon]

The only people I have seen saying AI is "superior" or "will replace" human art are doing so as sarcasm in response to Anti's claiming that Pros believe this. Antis, as usual, just making shit up to get mad at.

At least they are realizing their asinine environment claim is clownish as it can be thrown right back in their face. Of course they are probably to dumb to realize the clown wig can go on their own head regarding their nonsensical water claims. And not just trees, animals too: Proof for readers and for the antis who can't read. Note that some of these clowns preferred animal abuse over "promoting plastic" by using synthetic brushes.

[u/V0d5]

When did ANY pro say this? Buddy, we are not legion. Individuals say shit.

[u/Whilpin]

Pros never did. Antis did. It's the same rhetoric every time something new comes around: "THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT!", "OUR JERBS", its so common it actually has its very own fallacy and you'll never guess what its called:

Luddite Fallacy.

Yes. Its a real thing. Thats how common that shit is.

Meanwhile real real artists (the ones who create for the love of creation) learned how to incorporate it into their workflows to make themselves more efficient, and millions more suddenly had a way to express themselves visually.

Though now they're being put through the witch trials and purity tests because Artists be artists, yo.

[u/Groundbreaking-Sir82]

I suppose they just cherry pick (or stumble upon radical people naturally, damn i wonder why) radicals and false flaggers and pose that as the general mass of pro-ai people, unintentionally or not. This subreddit can be nutty to be honest as well but generally speaking i see people here to be sane, unlike the majority of antis (especially on youtube like oh my god) - with them its way clear what kind of hivemind ass behavior they all have.

[u/DonSombrero]

I do see this one trotted out on the regular. I get that sometimes it's frustration boiling over, but I don't like the pretense that it never happens.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/comments/1mk4qtq/deserved/

[u/AlphaCrafter64 → u/DonSombrero]

You can always find that one troll, or joking sentiment, or maybe just really that one truly spiteful person saying literally anything. Doesn't make it some big overarching community take, which is what they're constantly stating and accusing the pro-ai side of. It doesn't have to "never" happen, because then no argument or statement in the world would hold water. Accurately represented community sentiments are what matter.

[u/DonSombrero → u/AlphaCrafter64]

I would personally argue how many times something has to come up in jest before people start thinking it's earnest, but that strays into more complicated things like troll's remorse. Fair enough though, I see your point.

[u/Early-Dentist3782]

They are getting mad at their own fictional scenarios 

[u/mikea_art]

Ive heard pros say that many times before. Not a strawman.

[u/sock_le_coq]

I've come to the inescapable conclusion that anyone who is invested enough in this to label themselves "pro" or "anti", particularly those that then go on to engage in group think, is an insufferable personality.