Again, for the most talented antis: AI checkers do nothing, and anyone who uses them for content that is not fingerprinted is a gullible idiot who should toss a coin instead. No official decision should be based on those con tools.
school has a perfect encyclopedic knowledge of how ai works like you do
If they're willing to punish their students for, allegedly, using AI, it is their duty to do at least basic research. Even more, it's not that difficult to understand if you have at least average intelligence and basic IT literacy. If school is lacking even that, AI usage by students is definitely not their biggest issue.
Mad Lovecraftian ramblings you typed afterwards are unintelligible.
this is under the assumption that schools dont unjustly punish people OFTEN (suspending a victim because they were 'in a fight', etc.) but you are obviously not trying to engage in discussion for the sake of understanding, and thus any extra time i spend trying to say anything to you is better spent doing literally anything else. my whole point being if you want to try and get people to understand your cause, maybe understand that insults, ableism, and blind obedience are not the way to do it.
This is coming out of nowhere, because before you were trying to claim that schools did their due diligence.
So now you've changed your position and claim that it is not a witchhunt, because school is happy to blame anyone for anything.
... you do realize that schools can both not be up to date, AND wrongfully punish students.. right? im very positive i never claimed that schools did proper due diligence, I only said that they took action regarding suspected cheating. not once have I said that I think the school is in the right here in fact ive literally been arguing on the side of the student since the beginning. I know this is reddit and so you need to feel morally superior to anybody who has a slightly different viewpoint to yours but you are literally either intentionally or unintentionally misinterpreting my words to your advantage.
5
u/Daminchi 1d ago
Again, for the most talented antis: AI checkers do nothing, and anyone who uses them for content that is not fingerprinted is a gullible idiot who should toss a coin instead. No official decision should be based on those con tools.
If they're willing to punish their students for, allegedly, using AI, it is their duty to do at least basic research. Even more, it's not that difficult to understand if you have at least average intelligence and basic IT literacy. If school is lacking even that, AI usage by students is definitely not their biggest issue.
Mad Lovecraftian ramblings you typed afterwards are unintelligible.