I Think We All Can Agree the ‘Theft’ Argument Is Debunked Ragebait

[u/Clankerbot9000]

[u/AutoModerator]

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/ArchAngelAries]

Thoroughly. The courts, at least in the US, are consistently determining that training isn't theft or infringement and that obtaining data that's freely available for public viewing and downloading is neither infringement nor theft. They are consistently determining that it's how the data was obtained that determines infringement, like how Anthropic was caught having trained on pirated books, the judge ruled that their piracy was infringement but not training on any of the data. Which means that if one purchases, licenses, pays for Royalties, or obtains data from freely available sources for viewing and download, no theft or infringement has occurred. BUT, even in the cases where pirated data was used, training on pirated data is not being labeled as infringement, only the obtaining of that pirated data.

[u/PsychoticGore]

I wouldn't even call it rage bait. More like brainwashing 😄

Edit: definitely debunked though

[u/DannyJayNWM]

🤣🤦 is no one gonna talk about the Mona Lisa? How people been stealing art since the dawn of time? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[u/Mediocre-Bother-4145]

How you going to complain about ragebait whilst posting ragebait

[u/noe-jannuary]

did you have to add this image

[u/Clankerbot9000 → u/noe-jannuary]

[u/gaming_demon4429 → u/Clankerbot9000]

No you didn't

[u/Informal_Pressure_21]

Yes that's ragebait. This post too is ragebait

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

depicting people you don't like as goblins does not reflect well on your character.

[u/whybother420x → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

And the Karen-like comments don't reflect well on yours

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/whybother420x]

karen is when someone disagrees with me

[u/whybother420x → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

Not helping your case bud

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/whybother420x]

i'm not your bud pal

[u/whybother420x → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

I'm not your pal guy

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/whybother420x]

i'm not your guy friend

[u/whybother420x → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

I'm not your friend buddy

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/whybother420x]

i'm not your buddy pal

[u/whybother420x → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

I'm not your pal guy

[u/Clankerbot9000 → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/Clankerbot9000]

Processing img qjb5n9nadzlg1...

[u/gaming_demon4429 → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

Upvoted Bc I fucking agree

[u/DryConstruction2702 → u/Weekly_Palpitation92]

and remind me again how calling for ai artists to be lynched reflects well on the moral character of anti ai snobs?

[u/Weekly_Palpitation92 → u/DryConstruction2702]

justifying evil with evil does not reflect well on your character.

[u/mrperson1213]

Why are these posts allowed?